In situ investigation on the mixed-interaction mechanisms in the metal–ceramic system’s microwave sintering
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In situ investigation of the microstructure evolution and the mixed-interaction mechanisms of metal–ceramic materials during the microwave sintering process was carried out using the synchrotron radiation computed tomography technique. The results indicate that there are some special mixed-interaction mechanisms, which may promote the sintering process during the microwave heating of metal–ceramic materials. In the experiment, some particular sintering phenomena that differ from the microwave sintering of pure metal materials were observed, such as fast interface bonding and particle swallowing. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure evolution during microwave sintering showed that the decrement of grain surface bending energy of metal–ceramic materials was slower, while the sintering-neck growth rate was higher than that of the pure metal materials. These results may be caused by the mixed-interaction mechanisms between microwave and metal–ceramic materials, such as the “micro-focusing effect”, the special microwave interaction mechanisms on the particle surface and the heterogeneous metal–ceramic interface. This study will help to provide a useful reference for the improvement of the microstructure characteristics of metal–ceramic materials in microwave sintering.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Oghbaei · J Alloy Compd · 2010 · 175–189 · 494
2. Louzguine-Luzgina · J Alloy Compd · 2009 · 78–81 · 483
3. Saitou · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 875–879 · 54
4. Domenichini · Acta Mater · 2003 · 4815–4821 · 51
5. Cheng · Roy R Mater Lett · 2002 · 587–592 · 56
6. Roy · Nature · 1999 · 668–670 · 399
7. Breval · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2005 · 285–295 · 391
8. Demirskyi · J Alloy Compd · 2012 · 1–10 · 523
9. Janney · J Mater Sci · 1997 · 1347–1355 · 32
10. Birnboim · J Appl Phys · 1999 · 478–482 · 85
11. Ma · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 074906 · 101
12. Yoshikawa · J Microw Power Electromagn Energy · 2010 · 4–13 · 44
13. Cheng · Mat Res Innovat · 2002 · 170–177 · 5
14. Li · Chin J Lasers B · 1999 · B8 · 503
15. Li · Proc Eng · 2010 · 72–80 · 7
16. Feng · Mater Lett · 2012 · 162–164 · 67
17. Rybakov · J Am Ceram Soc · 2013 · 96 · 100310.1111/jace.12278 ↗
18. Rybakov · J Appl Phys · 2006 · 0235061–9 · 99
19. Liu · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 173117 · 92
20. Medioni · Comput Vis Graph Image Process · 1987 · 267–278 · 39
21. Yadoji · Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 269–278 · B98
22. Kuczynski · Trans Am Inst Min Met Eng · 1949 · 169–178 · 185
23. Demirskyi · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 552–555 · 62
24. Niu Yu, Xu Feng, Hu Xiaofang, Zhao Jianhua, Miao Hong, Wu Xiaoping, et al. J Nanomater; 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/728617.10.1155/2011/728617 ↗