Microscale hybridization for enhanced impact and post-impact strength in fibre-reinforced composites: A comparative analysis of three hybrid concepts
Source abstract
Abstract
Fibre-reinforced composites, such as carbon fibre-reinforced polymers (CFRP) and glass fibre-reinforced polymers (GFRP), are widely utilized in engineering applications for their exceptional strength and stiffness. However, their brittle failure and limited impact resistance hinder broader applications, especially in high-impact environments. Improving impact resistance is therefore critical for advancing their performance and expanding their usability. This study explores the development of novel composites with components hybridized on microscale that integrate high-strength fibres (e.g., carbon, glass) with ductile fibres (e.g., steel, aramid) through the fabrication of hybrid yarns featuring highly dispersed fibre components, rather than conventional layer-wise configurations. Three distinct hybrid composite concepts were developed using innovative fibre combinations and manufacturing techniques: Concept 1 (carbon, aramid, and thermoplastic filament yarns), Concept 2 (glass, stainless steel, and polypropylene yarns), and Concept 3 (recycled aramid, carbon, and thermoplastic fibres). The experimental results (tensile and Charpy impact tests) show that by using a specific combination of fibre materials, the properties: tensile strength, impact strength, and energy absorption of the hybrid composite can be specifically modified to meet the needs of the application. Notably, Concept 1 exhibited the highest tensile strength, while Concept 2 excelled in ductility and energy absorption. The hybrid yarns, produced using air texturing and carding techniques, showed optimized tensile properties through fine-tuning of air pressure and overfeed rates during manufacturing. These findings underscore the potential of hybrid composites with highly dispersed components in engineering applications requiring tailored properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Textile Machinery and High Performance Material Technology (ITM), Dresden University of Technology
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.tws.2017.11.01110.1016/j.tws.2017.11.011 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10718610.1016/j.tws.2020.107186 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.05.001 ↗
5. Düring D, Weiß L, Stefaniak D, et al. Low-velocity impact response of composite laminates with steel and elastomer protective layer. Composite Structures Bd 2015; 134: 1826, Elsevier BV.
6. 10.1177/146442071561282710.1177/1464420715612827 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0058544210.1007/BF00585442 ↗
8. 10.1111/ffe.1299510.1111/ffe.12995 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0054084610.1007/BF00540846 ↗
10. 10.1177/00219983830170010110.1177/002199838301700101 ↗
11. 10.1007/BF0055319410.1007/BF00553194 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2015.06.017 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10842210.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108422 ↗
14. 10.3390/polym904015110.3390/polym9040151 ↗
15. 10.1007/978-3-319-56227-810.1007/978-3-319-56227-8 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01140.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2007.01140.x ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.10385410.1016/j.jmps.2019.103854 ↗
18. Singh MK, Kitey R. Enhancing dynamic fracture behavior of laminated composite by short fibre reinforcement. In: Jonnalagadda K, Alankar A, Balila NJ, et al. (eds). Advances in Structural Integrity, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer Singapore, 2022, pp. 243–253.
19. 10.3390/su1410621510.3390/su14106215 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.01310.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.013 ↗
21. 10.1177/09636935070160010210.1177/096369350701600102 ↗
22. 10.3390/ma1612421510.3390/ma16124215 ↗
23. 10.1002/adem.20220144710.1002/adem.202201447 ↗
24. 10.1080/09506608.2018.146736510.1080/09506608.2018.1467365 ↗
25. 10.1016/0010-4361(87)90003-610.1016/0010-4361(87)90003-6 ↗
26. 10.3390/met1304063810.3390/met13040638 ↗
27. Alderliesten RC. Fatigue crack propagation and delamination growth in glare. Delft University Press, 2005.
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.03910.1016/j.matdes.2018.06.039 ↗
29. 10.1098/rsta.2011.044110.1098/rsta.2011.0441 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.10110.1016/j.msea.2012.08.101 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.04810.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.048 ↗
32. Monden A. Adhäsion zwischen epoxidharzbasiertem CFK und oberflächenmodifiziertem Stahl: Grenzschichtversagen von Hybridlaminaten unter Mode I, Mode II und Mixed-Mode Belastung. Universität Augsburg, 2016.
33. 10.3390/app1217883010.3390/app12178830 ↗
34. 10.3390/ma1604166810.3390/ma16041668 ↗
35. 10.3390/fib503002610.3390/fib5030026 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.001 ↗
37. 10.1515/secm-2013-002110.1515/secm-2013-0021 ↗
38. Overberg M, Hasan MMB, Rehra J, et al. Development of multi-material hybrid yarns consisting of steel, glass and polypropylene filaments for fibre hybrid composites. Textil Res J 2023; 9: 00405175231179759.
39. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research 2011; 12: 2825–2830.
40. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A10.1016/1359-835X(95)00065-A ↗