journal article·2013-02

Modeling rapid solidification of multi-component concentrated alloys

Kang Wang, Haifeng Wang, Feng Liu, Haimin Zhai

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A sharp interface model for rapid solidification of multi-component concentrated alloys was developed based on the thermodynamic extremal principle and extended irreversible thermodynamics. The evolution path of the system, including diffusion in the bulk phases and the contact conditions at the interface, was determined in which local non-equilibrium effects, both in the bulk phases and at the interface, were considered. Applying the present model, a comparative study with the model of Ludwig (Physica D 1998;124:271) was performed to show the kinetics of the steady-state interface. Due to correlations among different components in the concentrated solutions, the partition coefficients of certain alloys are predicted to change non-monotonically with interface velocity, accompanied with a significant lowering of the interface temperature. Combining the non-steady-state interface conditions with the present model and the model of Ludwig, the non-equilibrium transients after temperature perturbation were studied to show the evolution of the interface conditions, where the quasi-steady-states are reached after a very short time span (10 −10 s).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. Kurz · 1998
2. Herlach · Mater Sci Eng Rep R · 1994 · 12 · 17210.1016/0927-796X(94)90011-6 ↗
3. Aziz · J Appl Phys · 1982 · 53 · 115810.1063/1.329867 ↗
4. Aziz · Appl Phys Lett · 1983 · 43 · 55210.1063/1.94416 ↗
5. Aziz · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 233510.1016/0001-6160(88)90333-1 ↗
6. Hillert · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 448110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00336-5 ↗
7. Hillert · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 280310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00085-5 ↗
8. Buchmann · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 16910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.039 ↗
9. Sobolev · Phys Lett A · 1995 · 199 · 38310.1016/0375-9601(95)00084-G ↗
10. Galenko · Phys Lett A · 1994 · 190 · 29210.1016/0375-9601(94)90757-9 ↗
11. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 1997 · 55 · 34310.1103/PhysRevE.55.343 ↗
12. Jou · 1996
13. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 2007 · 76 · 03160610.1103/PhysRevE.76.031606 ↗
14. Galenko · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 14410310.1103/PhysRevB.65.144103 ↗
15. Wang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 144410.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.038 ↗
16. Galenko · Phys Lett A · 1997 · 235 · 27110.1016/S0375-9601(97)00562-8 ↗
17. Galenko · Phys Lett A · 1999 · 197 · 992
18. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 2004 · 69 · 05160810.1103/PhysRevE.69.051608 ↗
19. Wang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 49710.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.042 ↗
20. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1976 · 24 · 73110.1016/0001-6160(76)90108-5 ↗
21. Danilov · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 465910.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.045 ↗
22. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 74610.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.021 ↗
23. Li · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 719
24. Galenko · Phys Lett A · 2001 · 287 · 19010.1016/S0375-9601(01)00489-3 ↗
25. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 2005 · 71 · 04612510.1103/PhysRevE.71.046125 ↗
26. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 2011 · 84 · 04114310.1103/PhysRevE.84.041143 ↗
27. Ludwig · Physica D · 1998 · 124 · 27110.1016/S0167-2789(98)00202-4 ↗
28. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 136910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00443-8 ↗
29. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 304310.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.041 ↗
30. Hartmann · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 124310.1080/14786430412331333356 ↗
31. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 95910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.030 ↗
32. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 477510.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.020 ↗
33. Svoboda · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 369910.1080/14786430500267760 ↗
34. Onsager · Phys Rev · 1931 · 37 · 40510.1103/PhysRev.37.405 ↗
35. Nestler · Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci · 2011 · 15 · 9310.1016/j.cossms.2011.01.003 ↗
36. Garcke · SIAM J Appl Math · 2004 · 64 · 77510.1137/S0036139902413143 ↗
37. Nestler · Phys Rev E · 2005 · 71 · 04160910.1103/PhysRevE.71.041609 ↗
38. Bobadilla · J Cryst Growth · 1988 · 89 · 53110.1016/0022-0248(88)90216-3 ↗
39. Rappaz · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 320510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00188-3 ↗
40. Galenko · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 616610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.043 ↗
41. Fischer · Acta Mech · 2004 · 171 · 21310.1007/s00707-004-0138-6 ↗
42. Buchmann · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 10610.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.022 ↗
43. Dinsdale · Calphad · 1991 · 15 · 31710.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
44. Pan · J Phase Equilib Diff · 2005 · 26 · 22510.1007/s11669-005-0109-1 ↗
45. Liu · J Electron Mater · 2008 · 37 · 21010.1007/s11664-007-0315-1 ↗
46. Du · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · A363 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00624-5 ↗
47. Horbach · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 17430410.1103/PhysRevB.75.174304 ↗
48. Gamsjäger · Philos Mag Lett · 2008 · 88 · 36310.1080/09500830802039921 ↗
49. Kittl · J Appl Phys · 1993 · 73 · 372510.1063/1.352903 ↗
50. Kittl · J Cryst Growth · 1995 · 148 · 17210.1016/0022-0248(94)00836-1 ↗
51. Kittl · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 479710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00276-7 ↗
52. Olesinski · Bull Alloy Phase Diagr · 1985 · 6 · 25410.1007/BF02880410 ↗
53. Li · J Cryst Growth · 2010 · 312 · 98210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.12.070 ↗
54. Eckler · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 501910.1103/PhysRevB.45.5019 ↗
55. Yang · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 107 · 02550510.1103/PhysRevLett.107.025505 ↗