Parameters influence establishment of the petroleum coke genesis on the structure and properties of a highly porous carbon material obtained by activation of KOH
Source abstract
Abstract
Low-quality sulfur petroleum coke usually not widely qualified for use and is stockpiled at refineries around the world or used as solid fuel. One of the promising uses of low-quality petroleum coke is its physical or chemical activation in order to obtain a highly porous carbon material that can be used as a catalyst carrier, adsorbent, the basis for capacitive electrodes. In this work, four types of hydrocarbon which differ in origin, group hydrocarbon composition and properties, were used for petroleum coke production (vacuum residue, asphalt, heavy catalytic gasoil, heavy shale oil). In order to experimentally simulate the process of coke production was used a laboratory delayed coking unit with varying process parameters from 1.5 to 3.5 atmg at a temperature of 500 °C. The produced coke was subjected to chemical activation with KOH at 750 °C. Regularities of changes in the composition, structure and properties of coke produced with the examined raw materials at the typical regime parameters of the coking process during activation were studied by XRF, SEM, FT-IR spectroscopy, BET. It was shown that after activation the crystallinity of the coke and the mass of sulfur in the samples decreases, but increases the content of potassium. The largest surface area of 2302 m2/g and porosity 83% was obtained when using coke from vacuum residue at 1.5 atmg as a carbon feedstock for the activation process. In order to obtain a highly porous material it is necessary to use raw materials with less aromatic compounds, but containing comparable amounts of resins and saturated hydrocarbons.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Industrial Engineering and Technologies · Metal Extraction and Bioleaching · Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. V. Litvinenko, P. Tsvetkov, M. Dvoynikov, G. Buslaev, Barriers to implementation of hydrogen initiatives in the context of global energy sustainable development. J. Min. Inst. 244, 421 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31897/pmi.2020.4.510.31897/pmi.2020.4.5 ↗
2. D. Welsby, J. Price, S. Pye, P. Ekins, Unextractable fossil fuels in a 1.5 °C world. Nature 597, 230 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03821-810.1038/s41586-021-03821-8 ↗
3. M. Rogachev, A. Aleksandrov, Justification of a comprehensive technology for preventing the formation of asphalt-resin-paraffin deposits during the production of highlyparaffinic oil by electric submersible pumps from multiformation deposits. J. Min. Inst. 250, 596 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31897/pmi.2021.4.1310.31897/PMI.2021.4.13 ↗
4. V. Litvinenko, I. Bowbrick, I. Naumov, Z. Zaitseva, Global guidelines and requirements for professional competencies of natural resource extraction engineers: Implications for ESG principles and sustainable development goals. J. Clean. Prod. 338, 130530 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13053010.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130530 ↗
5. L. Ji, J. Huang, Z. Liu, H. Zhu, Z. Cai, The effects of employee training on the relationship between environmental attitude and firms’ performance in sustainable development. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 23, 2995 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.63707210.1080/09585192.2011.637072 ↗
6. P. Kharko, V. Matveeva, Bottom sediments in a river under acid and alkaline wastewater discharge. Ecol. Eng. Environ. Technol. 22, 35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/13487010.12912/27197050/134870 ↗
7. V.V. Vasilyev, E.V. Salamatova, N.V. Maidanova, M.V. Kalinin, V.M. Strakhov, Change in properties of roadmaking bitumen on oxidation. Coke Chem. 63, 307 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X2006008310.3103/S1068364X20060083 ↗
8. R. Sultanbekov, S. Islamov, D. Mardashov, I. Beloglazov, T. Hemmingsen, Research of the influence of marine residual fuel composition on sedimentation due to incompatibility. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9, 1067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse910106710.3390/jmse9101067 ↗
9. D.V. Mardashov, A.V. Bondarenko, I.R. Raupov, Technique for calculating technological parameters of non-Newtonian liquids injection into oil well during workover. J. Min. Inst. (2022). https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2022.1610.31897/PMI.2022.16 ↗
10. Y.V. Sharikov, F.Y. Sharikov, K.A. Krylov, Mathematical model of optimum control for petroleum coke production in a rotary tube kiln. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 55, 711 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S004057952103019210.1134/S0040579521030192 ↗
11. A.A. Polyakov, E.S. Gorlanov, E.A. Mushihin, Analytical modeling of current and potential distribution over carbon and low-consumable anodes during aluminum reduction process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 169, 053502 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac6a1610.1149/1945-7111/ac6a16 ↗
12. R.Y. Feshchenko, R.N. Eremin, O.O. Erokhina, V.G. Povarov, Improvement of oxidation resistance of graphite blocks for the electrolytic production of magnesium by impregnation with phosphate solutions. Part 2. Tsvetnye Met. (2022). https://doi.org/10.17580/tsm.2022.01.0210.17580/tsm.2022.01.02 ↗
13. J. Wu, V. Montes, L.D. Virla, J.M. Hill, Impacts of amount of chemical agent and addition of steam for activation of petroleum coke with KOH or NaOH. Fuel Process. Technol. 181, 53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.01810.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.018 ↗
14. M.L. Toebes, J.A. Van Dillen, K.P. De Jong, Synthesis of supported palladium catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A 173, 75 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-1169(01)00146-710.1016/S1381-1169(01)00146-7 ↗
15. I.N. Pyagay, A.A. Shaidulina, R.R. Konoplin, D.I. Artyushevskiy, E.A. Gorshneva, M.A. Sutyaginsky, Production of amorphous silicon dioxide derived from aluminum fluoride industrial waste and consideration of the possibility of its use as Al2O3-SiO2 catalyst supports. Catalysts 12, 162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal1202016210.3390/catal12020162 ↗
16. O.V. Cheremisina, M.A. Ponomareva, V.A. Bolotov, A.S. Osipov, A.V. Sitko, Thermodynamic characteristics of the hydrogen sulfide sorption process by ferromanganese materials. ACS Omega 7, 3007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c0603710.1021/acsomega.1c06037 ↗
17. O. Zubkova, A. Alexeev, A. Polyanskiy, K. Karapetyan, O. Kononchuk, M. Reinmöller, Complex processing of saponite waste from a diamond-mining enterprise. Appl. Sci. 11, 6615 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app1114661510.3390/app11146615 ↗
18. E. Cheremisina, O. Cheremisina, M. Ponomareva, V. Bolotov, A. Fedorov, Kinetic features of the hydrogen sulfide sorption on the ferro-manganese material. Metals (Basel) 11, 90 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/met1101009010.3390/met11010090 ↗
19. S.V. Fedoseev, P.S. Tcvetkov, Key factors of public perception of carbon dioxide capture and storage projects. J. Min. Inst. 237, 361 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2019.3.36110.31897/PMI.2019.3.361 ↗
20. A. Ilinova, N.V. Romasheva, G.A. Stroykov, Prospects and social effects of carbon dioxide sequestration and utilization projects. J. Min. Inst. 244, 493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2020.4.1210.31897/PMI.2020.4.12 ↗
21. T.M.M. Abdellatief, M.A. Ershov, V.M. Kapustin, M. Ali Abdelkareem, M. Kamil, A.G. Olabi, Recent trends for introducing promising fuel component to enhance the anti-knock quality of gasoline: A systematic review. Fuel 291, 120112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.12011210.1016/j.fuel.2020.120112 ↗
22. S. Liu, H. Wang, P. Neumann, C.S. Kim, K.J. Smith, Esterification over acid-treated mesoporous carbon derived from petroleum coke. ACS Omega 4, 6050 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0347210.1021/acsomega.8b03472 ↗
23. M. Wu, Q. Zha, J. Qiu, X. Han, Y. Guo, Z. Li, A. Yuan, X. Sun, Preparation of porous carbons from petroleum coke by different activation methods. Fuel 84, 1992 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.00810.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.008 ↗
24. W. Qiao, S.H. Yoon, I. Mochida, KOH activation of needle coke to develop activated carbons for high-performance EDLC. Energy Fuels 20, 1680 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef050313l10.1021/ef050313l ↗
25. C. Lu, S. Xu, C. Liu, The role of K2CO3 during the chemical activation of petroleum coke with KOH. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 87, 282 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.02.00110.1016/j.jaap.2010.02.001 ↗
26. X. Zhu, Y. Fu, G. Hu, Y. Shen, W. Dai, X. Hu, CO2 Capture with activated carbons prepared by petroleum coke and KOH at low pressure. Water Air Soil Pollut. 224, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1387-y10.1007/s11270-012-1387-y ↗
27. E. Jang, S.W. Choi, S.M. Hong, S. Shin, K.B. Lee, Development of a cost-effective CO2 adsorbent from petroleum coke via KOH activation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 429, 62 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.07510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.075 ↗
28. L.D. Virla, V. Montes, J. Wu, S.F. Ketep, J.M. Hill, Synthesis of porous carbon from petroleum coke using steam, potassium and sodium: сombining treatments to create mesoporosity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 234, 239 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.07.02210.1016/j.micromeso.2016.07.022 ↗
29. F. Caturla, M. Molina-Sabio, F. Rodríguez-Reinoso, Preparation of activated carbon by chemical activation with ZnCl2. Carbon N. Y. 29, 999 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90179-M10.1016/0008-6223(91)90179-M ↗
30. M. Olivares-Marín, C. Fernández-González, A. Macías-García, V. Gómez-Serrano, Preparation of activated carbon from cherry stones by chemical activation with ZnCl2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 5967 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.11.00810.1016/j.apsusc.2005.11.008 ↗
31. N. Rambabu, R. Azargohar, A.K. Dalai, J. Adjaye, Evaluation and comparison of enrichment efficiency of physical/chemical activations and functionalized activated carbons derived from fluid petroleum coke for environmental applications. Fuel Process. Technol. 106, 501 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.09.01910.1016/j.fuproc.2012.09.019 ↗
32. O. Oginni, K. Singh, G. Oporto, B. Dawson-Andoh, L. McDonald, E. Sabolsky, Effect of one-step and two-step H3PO4 activation on activated carbon characteristics. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 8, 100307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.10030710.1016/j.biteb.2019.100307 ↗
33. S. Savchenkov, Y. Kosov, V. Bazhin, K. Krylov, R. Kawalla, Microstructural master alloys features of aluminum–erbium system. Crystals 11, 1353 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1111135310.3390/cryst11111353 ↗
34. E. Raymundo-Piñero, P. Azaïs, T. Cacciaguerra, D. Cazorla-Amorós, A. Linares-Solano, F. Béguin, KOH and NaOH activation mechanisms of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with different structural organisation. Carbon N. Y. 43, 786 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2004.11.00510.1016/j.carbon.2004.11.005 ↗
35. M.E. Gálvez, M.J. Lázaro, R. Moliner, Novel activated carbon-based catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of nitrogen oxide. Catal. Today 102–103, 142 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.02010.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.020 ↗
36. M.J. Lázaro, M.E. Gálvez, C. Ruiz, R. Juan, R. Moliner, Vanadium loaded carbon-based catalysts for the reduction of nitric oxide. Appl. Catal. B 68, 130 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.02510.1016/j.apcatb.2006.07.025 ↗
37. M.J. Lázaro, M.E. Gálvez, S. Artal, J.M. Palacios, R. Moliner, Preparation of steam-activated carbons as catalyst supports. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 78, 301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2006.08.00710.1016/j.jaap.2006.08.007 ↗
38. M.A. Ershov, V.D. Savelenko, U.A. Makhova, V.M. Kapustin, D.A. Potanin, I.F. Habibullin, V.E. Lazarev, T.M.M. Abdellatief, M.A. Abdelkareem, A.G. Olabi, New insights on introducing modern multifunctional additives into motor gasoline. Sci. Total Environ. 808, 152034 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15203410.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152034 ↗
39. L. Chunlan, X. Shaoping, G. Yixiong, L. Shuqin, L. Changhou, Effect of pre-carbonization of petroleum cokes on chemical activation process with KOH. Carbon N. Y. 43, 2295 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.04.00910.1016/j.carbon.2005.04.009 ↗
40. B. Jiang, Y. Zhang, J. Zhou, K. Zhang, S. Chen, Effects of chemical modification of petroleum cokes on the properties of the resulting activated carbon. Fuel 87, 1844 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.11.01010.1016/j.fuel.2007.11.010 ↗
41. J. Shan, J. Huang, J. Li, G. Li, J. Zhao, Y. Fang, Insight into transformation of sulfur species during KOH activation of high sulfur petroleum coke. Fuel 215, 258 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.11710.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.117 ↗
42. S.H. Lee, C.S. Choi, Chemical activation of high sulfur petroleum cokes by alkali metal compounds. Fuel Process. Technol. 64, 141 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(00)00070-910.1016/S0378-3820(00)00070-9 ↗
43. H. Predel, Ullmann’s Encycl. Ind. Chem. (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2014), pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a19_235.pub310.1002/14356007.a19_235.pub3 ↗
44. V.N. Brichkin, A.T. Fedorov, Indicators and regularities of hydrolytic decomposition of metastable aluminate solutions in the Na2O–K2O–Al2O3–H2O system. Non-Ferr. Met. (2021). https://doi.org/10.17580/nfm.2021.02.0410.17580/nfm.2021.02.04 ↗
45. V.N. Brichkin, A.T. Fedorov, Thermodynamic Modelling of Ion Equilibria in the Na2O–Al2O3–H2O System with Gibbsite. Tsvetnye Met. (2022). https://doi.org/10.17580/tsm.2022.03.0810.17580/tsm.2022.03.08 ↗
46. W.L. Bragg, The structure of some crystals as indicated by their diffraction of x-rays. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 89, 248 (1913). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1913.008310.1098/rspa.1913.0083 ↗
47. G. Wulff, Phys. Zeitschrift 14, 217 (1913)
48. P. Scherrer, Kolloidchem. Ein Lehrb (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1912), pp. 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-33915-2_710.1007/978-3-662-33915-2_7 ↗
49. F.R. Feret, Determination of the crystallinity of calcined and graphitic cokes by X-ray diffraction. Analyst 123, 595 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1039/a707845e10.1039/a707845e ↗
50. Z.R. Ismagilov, S.A. Sozinov, A.N. Popova, V.P. Zaporin, Structural analysis of needle coke. Coke Chem. 62, 135 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X1904002110.3103/S1068364X19040021 ↗
51. R.R. Konoplin, N.K. Kondrasheva, Difficulties in the industrial introduction of new effective hydrodesulfurization catalysts in the Russian Federation. E3S Web Conf. 266, 02016 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20212660201610.1051/e3sconf/202126602016 ↗
52. Y. Song, S. Lei, J. Li, N. Yin, J. Zhou, X. Lan, In situ FT-IR analysis of coke formation mechanism during Co-pyrolysis of low-rank coal and direct coal liquefaction residue. Renew. Energy 179, 2048 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.03010.1016/j.renene.2021.08.030 ↗
53. M.A. Ershov, D.A. Potanin, E.V. Grigorieva, T.M.M. Abdellatief, V.M. Kapustin, Discovery of a high-octane environmental gasoline based on the gasoline fischer–tropsch process. Energy Fuels 34, 4221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0000910.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00009 ↗
54. D.D. Lyakh, I.N. Khudyakova, S.L. Ivanov, Justification of peat block-making module parameters and mass/power characteristics for peat production machinery. MIAB. Mining Inf. Anal. Bull. 6, 93 (2022). https://doi.org/10.25018/0236_1493_2022_6_0_9310.25018/0236_1493_2022_6_0_93 ↗
55. R. Sultanbekov, I. Beloglazov, S. Islamov, M. Ong, Exploring of the incompatibility of marine residual fuel: a case study using machine learning methods. Energies 14, 8422 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/en1424842210.3390/en14248422 ↗
56. S.R. Islamov, A.V. Bondarenko, D.V. Mardashov, Top. Issues Ration. Use Nat. Resour. 2019 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2019), pp. 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003014638-210.1201/9781003014638-2 ↗
57. H. Zheng, R. Xu, J. Zhang, O. Daghagheleh, J. Schenk, C. Li, W. Wang, Materials 15, 174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1501017410.3390/ma15010174 ↗
58. H. Zhang, S. Shao, R. Xiao, D. Shen, J. Zeng, Characterization of coke deposition in the catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass derivates. Energy Fuels 28, 52 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401458y10.1021/ef401458y ↗
59. J.A. Maciá-Agulló, B.C. Moore, D. Cazorla-Amorós, A. Linares-Solano, Influence of carbon fibres crystallinities on their chemical activation by KOH and NaOH. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 101, 397 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.00210.1016/j.micromeso.2006.12.002 ↗
60. A.N. Popova, Crystallographic analysis of graphite by X-Ray diffraction. Coke Chem. 60, 361 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068364X1709005810.3103/S1068364X17090058 ↗
61. B. Issa, V.Y. Bazhin, Assessment of possibility of obtaining alloying components in the process of desalting of heavy hydrocarbon raw materials. Part 2. CIS Iron Steel Rev. 21, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.17580/cisisr.2021.01.0210.17580/cisisr.2021.01.02 ↗
62. A.Ya. Boduen, G.V. Petrov, A.A. Kobylyansky, A.G. Bulaev, Sulfide leaching of high-grade arsenic copper concentrates. Obogashchenie Rud. 1, 14 (2022). https://doi.org/10.17580/or.2022.01.0310.17580/or.2022.01.03 ↗
63. A.I. Shkatulov, J. Houben, H. Fischer, H.P. Huinink, Stabilization of K2CO3 in vermiculite for thermochemical energy storage. Renew. Energy 150, 990 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.11910.1016/j.renene.2019.11.119 ↗
64. X. Yao, H. Zhou, K. Xu, Q. Xu, L. Li, Evaluation of the fusion and agglomeration properties of ashes from combustion of biomass, coal and their mixtures and the effects of K2CO3 additives. Fuel 255, 115829 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.11582910.1016/j.fuel.2019.115829 ↗