journal article·2011-08

Loss of interface coherency around a misfitting spherical inclusion

Siu Sin Quek, Yang Xiang, David J. Srolovitz

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The interfaces between different materials can be coherent (heteroepitaxial), semi-coherent or incoherent. A semi-coherent interface is one in which the misfit between the two phases is partially or fully accommodated by discrete interfacial dislocations. A precipitate–matrix interface may undergo a transition from coherent to semi-coherent through dislocation nucleation or interactions with pre-existing dislocations during plastic deformation. Dislocation–precipitate interactions can also be modified significantly by the degree of coherency of the interface. In this study, we examine how plasticity mediates the change from coherent to semi-coherent interfaces in the case of a misfitting spherical particle, i.e. how the matrix dislocations relax the misfit of the particle and form dislocation structures on the particle–matrix interface. Various stable dislocation structures on the semi-coherent particles are studied. We also examine how dislocation–particle interactions are influenced by the change in the particle from coherent to semi-coherent. These simulations are performed using a three-dimensional level set dislocation dynamics method.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Eikum · Acta Metall · 1964 · 12 · 53710.1016/0001-6160(64)90026-4 ↗
2. Humphreys · Philos Mag · 1968 · 16 · 92710.1080/14786436708229685 ↗
3. Humphreys · Acta Metall · 1968 · 16 · 106910.1016/0001-6160(68)90095-3 ↗
4. Nardone · Scripta Metall · 1983 · 17 · 46710.1016/0036-9748(83)90333-2 ↗
5. Herrick · Sripta Metall · 1988 · 22 · 187910.1016/S0036-9748(88)80230-8 ↗
6. Han · Met Mater Int · 2007 · 13 · 3110.1007/BF03027820 ↗
7. Srolovitz · Philos Mag A · 1983 · 48 · 79510.1080/01418618308236545 ↗
8. Xiang · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 174510.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.016 ↗
9. Xiang · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 393710.1080/14786430600575427 ↗
10. Xiang · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 549910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00415-4 ↗
11. Philips · 2001
12. Raj · Metall Trans · 1971 · 2 · 111310.1007/BF02664244 ↗
13. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 05410410.1103/PhysRevB.81.054104 ↗
14. Quek · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 237110.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.017 ↗
15. Quek · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 01190510.1063/1.2426971 ↗
16. Quek · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 22610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.073 ↗
17. Osher · J Comput Phys · 1988 · 79 · 1210.1016/0021-9991(88)90002-2 ↗
18. Burchard · J Comput Phys · 2001 · 90 · 011905
19. Sethian · 1999
20. Osher · 2003
21. 1956 · Vol. 3
22. Hirth · 1982
23. Lardner · 1974
24. Pyczak · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 295 · 510
25. Vorberg · JOM · 2005 · 57 · 4910.1007/s11837-005-0233-8 ↗
26. Sutton · 2009
27. Frank · 1950
28. Bilby · 1955
29. Frank · Proc Roy Soc A · 1949 · 198 · 20510.1098/rspa.1949.0095 ↗
30. Jesser · Phys Status Solidi · 1967 · 19 · 9510.1002/pssb.19670190110 ↗