journal article·2011-03

Scanning transmission electron microscope observations of defects in as-grown and pre-strained Mo alloy fibers

P. Sudharshan Phani, K.E. Johanns, G. Duscher, A. Gali, E.P. George, G.M. Pharr

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Compression testing of micro-pillars has recently been of great interest to the small-scale mechanics community. Previous compression tests on single crystal Mo alloy micro-pillars produced by directional solidification of eutectic alloys showed that as-grown pillars yield at strengths close to the theoretical strength while pre-strained pillars yield at considerably lower stresses. In addition, the flow behavior changes from stochastic to deterministic with increasing pre-strain. In order to gain a microstructural insight into this behavior, an aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscope was used to study the defect structures in as-grown and pre-strained single crystal Mo alloy fibers. The as-grown fibers were found to be defect free over large lengths while the highly pre-strained (16%) fibers had high defect densities that were uniform throughout. Interestingly, the fibers with intermediate pre-strain (4%) exhibited an inhomogeneous defect distribution. The observed defect structures and their distributions are correlated with the previously reported stress–strain behavior. Some of the mechanistic interpretations of Bei et al. are examined in the light of new microstructural observations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Bei · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 39710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.05.010 ↗
2. Bei · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 476210.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.030 ↗
3. Uchic · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2009 · 39 · 36110.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145422 ↗
4. Uchic · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 26810.1016/j.msea.2005.03.082 ↗
5. Lee · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 440410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.002 ↗
6. Norfleet · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 298810.1016/j.actamat.2008.02.046 ↗
7. Maaß · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 47110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.034 ↗
8. Kim · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 235510.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.022 ↗
9. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 58010.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.015 ↗
10. Kiener · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 505 · 7910.1016/j.msea.2009.01.005 ↗
11. Hemker · Nat Mater · 2008 · 7 · 9710.1038/nmat2103 ↗
12. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
13. Shan · Nat Mater · 2008 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
14. Frick · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 489 · 31910.1016/j.msea.2007.12.038 ↗
15. Ng · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 171210.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.016 ↗
16. El-Awady · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 10410410.1103/PhysRevB.80.104104 ↗
17. Shim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 50310.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.033 ↗
18. Kiener · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 459 · 26210.1016/j.msea.2007.01.046 ↗
19. Bei · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 11191510.1063/1.2784948 ↗
20. Lowry · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 516010.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.052 ↗
21. Bei · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 6910.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.003 ↗
22. Frankel · Electrochim Acta · 2009 · 54 · 601510.1016/j.electacta.2009.01.049 ↗
23. Rohatgi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2002 · 328 · 25610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01702-6 ↗
24. Oh · Nat Mater · 2009 · 8 · 9510.1038/nmat2370 ↗
25. Barabash · J Mater Res · 2010 · 25 · 19910.1557/JMR.2010.0043 ↗
26. Zimmermann · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 74610.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.013 ↗