A review of graphene-oxide/metal–organic framework composites materials: characteristics, preparation and applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Graphene-oxide (GO) is an oxidized derivative of graphene. GO has a large number of oxygen-containing functional groups, including hydroxyl, carboxyl, and epoxy groups. The introduction of these groups makes its physical and chemical properties more complicated. For example, although GO films are impermeable to other liquids and even gases, they exhibit abnormally high permeance of water through the GO film. As a three-dimensional hollow material, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have a very large specific surface area and pore volume, and have a wide range of applications in catalysis, adsorption, and separations. Combining GO with MOFs can alter the distance between the layers of the GO to affect the transport and screening of specific molecules. This gives composites many potential applications in areas such as gas treatment and water treatment. This review summarizes the current status of GO/MOF composites, expanding on the following aspects: (1) We begin by reviewing the current status of research on GO and MOF with a focus on the physical properties. The mechanical strength of single-layer graphene is very weak, and in most solvents, GO spontaneously aggregates and is very difficult to effectively disperse. On the other hand, MOFs have high specific surface area, high crystallinity, and high porosity, but relatively low stability. Their relative instability greatly limited their practical applications. The formation of GO/MOF composites can take advantage of desirable properties of both material types, while improving their physical characteristics. (2) We next review the characteristics, preparation and applications of GO/MOF composites. At present, various GO/MOF composite materials, such as GO/ZIF-8, GO/MOF-5 have been prepared by in-situ synthesis and other methods. They are widely used in gas adsorption and separation, wastewater treatment applications, and molecular sieve applications. (3) We conclude this review by summarizing the opportunities for achieving composites materials with hydrophilic, antifouling, high-throughput, and high-repulsion properties by efficient, controllable, and low-cost methods. As GO/MOF technology improves, we suggest that these versatile materials have additional prospective applications in other areas, including as materials for medical applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Shen, X. Xiao, X. Xiao, J. Chen, Wearable triboelectric nanogenerators for heart rate monitoring. Chem. Commun. 57, 5871–5879 (2021)10.1039/D1CC02091A ↗
2. X. Xiao et al., Bioinspired slippery cone for controllable manipulation of gas bubbles in low-surface-tension environment. ACS Nano 13, 4083–4090 (2019)10.1021/acsnano.8b08480 ↗
3. X. Xiao et al., Bioinspired two-dimensional structure with asymmetric wettability barriers for unidirectional and long-distance gas bubble delivery underwater. Nano Lett. 21, 2117–2123 (2021)10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04814 ↗
4. L. Jin et al., Manipulating relative permittivity for high-performance wearable triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Lett. 20, 6404–6411 (2020)10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01987 ↗
5. C. Zhang et al., Efficient separation of immiscible oil/water mixtures using a perforated lotus leaf. Green Chem. 21, 6579–6584 (2019)10.1039/C9GC03254A ↗
6. A. Tkaczyk, K. Mitrowska, A. Posyniak, Synthetic organic dyes as contaminants of the aquatic environment and their implications for ecosystems: a review. Sci Total Environ 717, 137222 (2020)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137222 ↗
7. S.H. Khan, B. Pathak, Zinc oxide based photocatalytic degradation of persistent pesticides: a comprehensive review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 13, 100290 (2020)
8. R. Lafi, L. Gzara, R.H. Lajimi, A. Hafiane, Treatment of textile wastewater by a hybrid ultrafiltration/electrodialysis process. Chem. Eng. Process. 132, 105–113 (2018)10.1016/j.cep.2018.08.010 ↗
9. V. Katheresan, J. Kansedo, S.Y. Lau, Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: a review. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 6, 4676–4697 (2018)10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 ↗
10. S. Cotillas et al., Removal of procion red MX-5B dye from wastewater by conductive-diamond electrochemical oxidation. Electrochim. Acta 263, 1–7 (2018)10.1016/j.electacta.2018.01.052 ↗
11. Y. Peng, Y. Zhang, H. Huang, C. Zhong, Flexibility induced high-performance MOF-based adsorbent for nitroimidazole antibiotics capture. Chem. Eng. J. 333, 678–685 (2018)10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.138 ↗
12. L. Tang et al., Sustainable efficient adsorbent: Alkali-acid modified magnetic biochar derived from sewage sludge for aqueous organic contaminant removal. Chem. Eng. J. 336, 160–169 (2018)10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.048 ↗
13. Z. Meng et al., Polymer nanotube membranes synthesized via liquid deposition in anodic alumina. Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 39, 100334 (2020)10.1016/j.colcom.2020.100334 ↗
14. S. Kim et al., Removal of contaminants of emerging concern by membranes in water and wastewater: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 335, 896–914 (2018)10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.044 ↗
15. H.Y. Yang et al., Carbon nanotube membranes with ultrahigh specific adsorption capacity for water desalination and purification. Nat. Commun. 4, 2220 (2013)10.1038/ncomms3220 ↗
16. K. Goh et al., Carbon nanomaterials for advancing separation membranes: a strategic perspective. Carbon 109, 694–710 (2016)10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.077 ↗
17. M. Nandi et al., Unprecedented CO2 uptake over highly porous N-doped activated carbon monoliths prepared by physical activation. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 48, 10283–10285 (2012)10.1039/c2cc35334b ↗
18. A. Wahby et al., High-surface-area carbon molecular sieves for selective CO(2) adsorption. Chemsuschem 3, 974–981 (2010)10.1002/cssc.201000083 ↗
19. F. Gholipour, M. Mofarahi, Adsorption equilibrium of methane and carbon dioxide on zeolite 13X: experimental and thermodynamic modeling. J. Supercrit. Fluids 111, 47–54 (2016)10.1016/j.supflu.2016.01.008 ↗
20. A. Möller, A. Pessoa-Guimaraes, R. Gläser, R. Staudt, Uptake-curves for the determination of diffusion coefficients and sorption equilibria for n-alkanes on zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 125, 23–29 (2009)10.1016/j.micromeso.2009.04.029 ↗
21. R. Krishna, J.M. van Baten, A comparison of the CO2 capture characteristics of zeolites and metal–organic frameworks. Sep. Purif. Technol. 87, 120–126 (2012)10.1016/j.seppur.2011.11.031 ↗
22. H. Oh et al., Efficient synthesis for large-scale production and characterization for hydrogen storage of ligand exchanged MOF-74/174/184-M (M=Mg2+, Ni2+). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 1027–1035 (2017)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.153 ↗
23. D. Jiang et al., The application of different typological and structural MOFs-based materials for the dyes adsorption. Coord. Chem. Rev. 380, 471–483 (2019)10.1016/j.ccr.2018.11.002 ↗
24. J. Li, H. Wang, X. Yuan, J. Zhang, J.W. Chew, Metal-organic framework membranes for wastewater treatment and water regeneration. Coord. Chem. Rev. 404, 213116 (2020)10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213116 ↗
25. A. Klechikov et al., Hydrogen storage in high surface area graphene scaffolds. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 51, 15280–15283 (2015)10.1039/C5CC05474E ↗
26. B. Li et al., Graphene-based porous materials with tunable surface area and CO2 adsorption properties synthesized by fluorine displacement reaction with various diamines. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 478, 36–45 (2016)10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.062 ↗
27. B. Szczęśniak, Ł Osuchowski, J. Choma, M. Jaroniec, Highly porous carbons obtained by activation of polypyrrole/reduced graphene oxide as effective adsorbents for CO2, H2 and C6H6. J. Porous Mater. 25, 621–627 (2018)10.1007/s10934-017-0475-1 ↗
28. M.D. Firouzjaei et al., Exploiting synergetic effects of graphene oxide and a silver-based metal-organic framework to enhance antifouling and anti-biofouling properties of thin-film nanocomposite membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 42967–42978 (2018)10.1021/acsami.8b12714 ↗
29. J. Li et al., Enhanced CO2 capture on graphene via N S dual-doping. Appl. Surf. Sci. 399, 420–425 (2017)10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.157 ↗
30. M.J. Kalmutzki, N. Hanikel, O.M. Yaghi, Secondary building units as the turning point in the development of the reticular chemistry of MOFs. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat9180 (2018)10.1126/sciadv.aat9180 ↗
31. X.S. Xing et al., High proton conduction in an excellent water-stable gadolinium metal-organic framework. Chem. Commun. (Camb) 55, 1241–1244 (2019)10.1039/C8CC08700H ↗
32. C. Hu et al., Toughening mechanisms of epoxy resin using aminated metal-organic framework as additive. Mater. Lett. 240, 113–116 (2019)10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.123 ↗
33. M.F. de Lange, K.J. Verouden, T.J. Vlugt, J. Gascon, F. Kapteijn, Adsorption-driven heat pumps: the potential of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 115, 12205–12250 (2015)10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00059 ↗
34. U. Ryu et al., Recent advances in process engineering and upcoming applications of metal–organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 426, 213544 (2021)10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213544 ↗
35. H. Li et al., Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: status and challenges. EnergyChem 1, 100006 (2019)10.1016/j.enchem.2019.100006 ↗
36. B. Li, H.M. Wen, W. Zhou, B. Chen, Porous metal-organic frameworks for gas storage and separation: what, how, and why? J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5, 3468–3479 (2014)10.1021/jz501586e ↗
37. X. Li, X. Yang, H. Xue, H. Pang, Q. Xu, Metal–organic frameworks as a platform for clean energy applications. EnergyChem 2, 100027 (2020)10.1016/j.enchem.2020.100027 ↗
38. P. Falcaro et al., A new method to position and functionalize metal-organic framework crystals. Nat. Commun. 2, 237 (2011)10.1038/ncomms1234 ↗
39. H.R. Moon, D.W. Lim, M.P. Suh, Fabrication of metal nanoparticles in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 1807–1824 (2013)10.1039/C2CS35320B ↗
40. V. Lykourinou, Y. Chen, X. Wang, L.J.J.A.C.S. Meng, T. Hoang, L.-J. Ming, R.L. Musselman, S. Ma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 10382–10385 (2011)10.1021/ja2038003 ↗
41. L. Wang et al., Layer-by-layer fabrication of high-performance polyamide/ZIF-8 nanocomposite membrane for nanofiltration applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 24082–24093 (2015)10.1021/acsami.5b07128 ↗
42. Y. Li, L.H. Wee, A. Volodin, J.A. Martens, I.F.J. Vankelecom, Polymer supported ZIF-8 membranes prepared via an interfacial synthesis method. Chem. Commun. 51, 918–920 (2015)10.1039/C4CC06699E ↗
43. R. Wang et al., In situ growth of ZIF-67 on ultrathin CoAl layered double hydroxide nanosheets for electrochemical sensing toward naphthol isomers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 576, 313–321 (2020)10.1016/j.jcis.2020.05.042 ↗
44. M.J.C. Ordoñez, K.J. Balkus, J.P. Ferraris, I.H. Musselman, Molecular sieving realized with ZIF-8/Matrimid® mixed-matrix membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 361, 28–37 (2010)10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.017 ↗
45. Q.L. Zhu, Q. Xu, Metal-organic framework composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5468–5512 (2014)10.1039/C3CS60472A ↗
46. F. Xiang, A.M. Marti, D.P. Hopkinson, Layer-by-layer assembled polymer/MOF membrane for H2/CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 556, 146–153 (2018)10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.081 ↗
47. S.J. Yang et al., Preparation and enhanced hydrostability and hydrogen storage capacity of CNT@MOF-5 hybrid composite. Chem. Mater. 21, 1893–1897 (2009)10.1021/cm803502y ↗
48. Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, T.S. Chung, Nanometric graphene oxide framework membranes with enhanced heavy metal removal via nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 10235–10242 (2015)10.1021/acs.est.5b02086 ↗
49. Y. Han, Y. Jiang, C. Gao, High-flux graphene oxide nanofiltration membrane intercalated by carbon nanotubes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 8147–8155 (2015)10.1021/acsami.5b00986 ↗
50. S. Janakiram, J.L. Martín Espejo, X. Yu, L. Ansaloni, L. Deng, Facilitated transport membranes containing graphene oxide-based nanoplatelets for CO2 separation: effect of 2D filler properties. J. Membr. Sci. 616, 118626 (2020)10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118626 ↗
51. Y. Liu et al., Core-shell noble-metal@ metal-organic-framework nanoparticles with highly selective sensing property. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3741–3745 (2013)10.1002/anie.201209903 ↗
52. Y. Zheng, S. Zheng, H. Xue, H. Pang, Metal-organic frameworks/graphene-based materials: preparations and applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1804950 (2018)10.1002/adfm.201804950 ↗
53. B. Szczęśniak, J. Choma, M. Jaroniec, Gas adsorption properties of hybrid graphene-MOF materials. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 514, 801–813 (2018)10.1016/j.jcis.2017.11.049 ↗
54. W. Wei, Z. Liu, R. Wei, G.-C. Han, C. Liang, Synthesis of MOFs/GO composite for corrosion resistance application on carbon steel. RSC Adv. 10, 29923–29934 (2020)10.1039/D0RA05690A ↗
55. D.C. Marcano et al., Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4, 4806–4814 (2010)10.1021/nn1006368 ↗
56. Y. Zhu et al., Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 22, 3906–3924 (2010)10.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
57. D.R. Dreyer, S. Park, C.W. Bielawski, R.S. Ruoff, The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 228–240 (2010)10.1039/B917103G ↗
58. Y. Zhu et al., Graphene and graphene oxide: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 22, 3906–3924 (2010)10.1002/adma.201001068 ↗
59. R.D.P. Ji Won Suk, J. An, R.S. Ruoff, Mechanical properties of monolayer graphene oxide. ACSNANO 4, 6557–6564 (2010)
60. B. Szczęśniak, J. Choma, M. Jaroniec, Gas adsorption properties of graphene-based materials. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 243, 46–59 (2017)10.1016/j.cis.2017.03.007 ↗
61. J. Chen, B. Yao, C. Li, G. Shi, An improved Hummers method for eco-friendly synthesis of graphene oxide. Carbon 64, 225–229 (2013)10.1016/j.carbon.2013.07.055 ↗
62. G. Liu, Graphene-based membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5016 (2015)10.1039/C4CS00423J ↗
63. T.S. Sreeprasad, V. Berry, How do the electrical properties of graphene change with its functionalization? Small 9, 341–350 (2013)10.1002/smll.201202196 ↗
64. V. Berry, Impermeability of graphene and its applications. Carbon 62, 1–10 (2013)10.1016/j.carbon.2013.05.052 ↗
65. R.R. Nair, H.A. Wu, P.N. Jayaram, I.V. Grigorieva, A.K. Geim, Unimpeded permeation of water through helium-leak-tight graphene-based membranes. Science 335, 442–444 (2012)10.1126/science.1211694 ↗
66. A.B. Bourlinos et al., Graphite oxide: chemical reduction to graphite and surface modification with primary aliphatic amines and amino acids. Langmuir 19, 6050–6055 (2003)10.1021/la026525h ↗
67. Y. You, V. Sahajwalla, M. Yoshimura, R.K. Joshi, Graphene and graphene oxide for desalination. Nanoscale 8, 117–119 (2016)10.1039/C5NR06154G ↗
68. H. Huang, Y. Ying, X. Peng, Graphene oxide nanosheet: an emerging star material for novel separation membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 13772–13782 (2014)10.1039/C4TA02359E ↗
69. E.N. Wang, R. Karnik, Graphene cleans up water. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 552–554 (2012)10.1038/nnano.2012.153 ↗
70. Z. Zhang et al., Theory and simulation developments of confined mass transport through graphene-based separation membranes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 6032–6057 (2020)10.1039/C9CP05551G ↗
71. M. Tanhaei, A.R. Mahjoub, V. Safarifard, Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis and characterization of nanocomposites from azine-decorated metal-organic framework and graphene oxide layers. Mater. Lett. 227, 318–321 (2018)10.1016/j.matlet.2018.04.130 ↗
72. G. Liu, W. Jin, N. Xu, Graphene-based membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 5016–5030 (2015)10.1039/C4CS00423J ↗
73. S.P. Koenig, L. Wang, J. Pellegrino, J.S. Bunch, Selective molecular sieving through porous graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 728–732 (2012)10.1038/nnano.2012.162 ↗
74. B.W. Kyaw Sint, P. Kra, Selective ion passage through functionalized graphene nanopores. JACS 130, 16448 (2008)10.1021/ja804409f ↗
75. A.A. Balandin et al., Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett. 8, 902–907 (2008)10.1021/nl0731872 ↗
76. Z. Li et al., Tuning the interlayer spacing of graphene laminate films for efficient pore utilization towards compact capacitive energy storage. Nat. Energy 5, 160–168 (2020)10.1038/s41560-020-0560-6 ↗
77. Y.-C. Du et al., Preparation of graphene oxide/silica hybrid composite membranes and performance studies in water treatment. J. Mater. Sci. 55, 11188–11202 (2020)10.1007/s10853-020-04774-5 ↗
78. Y. Zhang et al., The preparation and study of ethylene glycol-modified graphene oxide membranes for water purification. Polym (Basel) 11, 188 (2019)10.3390/polym11020188 ↗
79. Z. Zhang et al., Bioinspired graphene oxide membranes with pH-responsive nanochannels for high-performance nanofiltration. ACS Nano (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c0271910.1021/acsnano.1c02719 ↗
80. Y.C. Du et al., Recent developments in graphene-based polymer composite membranes: preparation, mass transfer mechanism, and applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 136, 47761 (2019)10.1002/app.47761 ↗
81. K. Yang et al., Graphene oxide/nanometal composite membranes for nanofiltration: synthesis, mass transport mechanism, and applications. New J. Chem. 43, 2846–2860 (2019)10.1039/C8NJ06045B ↗
82. M.-M. Cheng et al., Reduced graphene oxide–gold nanoparticle membrane for water purification. Sep. Sci. Technol. 54, 1079–1085 (2019)10.1080/01496395.2018.1525400 ↗
83. M.-M. Cheng et al., Synthesis of graphene oxide/polyacrylamide composite membranes for organic dyes/water separation in water purification. J. Mater. Sci. 54, 252–264 (2019)10.1007/s10853-018-2828-9 ↗
84. G.-F. Liu et al., Preparation of a graphene/silver hybrid membrane as a new nanofiltration membrane. RSC Adv. 7, 49159–49165 (2017)10.1039/C7RA07904D ↗
85. Y.-C. Zhao et al., Synthesis of graphene oxide/rare-earth complex hybrid luminescent materials via π-π stacking and their pH-dependent luminescence. J. Alloys Compd. 687, 95–103 (2016)10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.100 ↗
86. L.-J. Huang et al., Graphene/silver nanocomposites stabilize Mg-Ni-La electrode alloys and enhance electrochemical performance. J. Alloys Compd. 694, 1140–1148 (2017)10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.068 ↗
87. A.U. Alam, M.J. Deen, Bisphenol a electrochemical sensor using graphene oxide and β-cyclodextrin-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chem. 92, 5532–5539 (2020)10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00402 ↗
88. J. Sethi et al., A label-free biosensor based on graphene and reduced graphene oxide dual-layer for electrochemical determination of beta-amyloid biomarkers. Microchim. Acta 187, 288 (2020)10.1007/s00604-020-04267-x ↗
89. J. Wu et al., Graphene oxide for integrated photonics and flat optics. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006415 (2021)10.1002/adma.202006415 ↗
90. S. Biswas et al., Nonlinear optical properties and temperature dependent photoluminescence in hbn-go heterostructure 2D material. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 8060–8069 (2017)10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12834 ↗
91. A.V. Kildishev, A. Boltasseva, V.M. Shalaev, Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009 (2013)10.1126/science.1232009 ↗
92. F. Aieta et al., Aberration-free ultrathin flat lenses and axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 12, 4932–4936 (2012)10.1021/nl302516v ↗
93. G. Fadillah, W.P. Wicaksono, I. Fatimah, T.A. Saleh, A sensitive electrochemical sensor based on functionalized graphene oxide/SnO2 for the determination of eugenol. Microchem. J. 159, 105353 (2020)10.1016/j.microc.2020.105353 ↗
94. H. Kalita, V.S. Palaparthy, M.S. Baghini, M. Aslam, Electrochemical synthesis of graphene quantum dots from graphene oxide at room temperature and its soil moisture sensing properties. Carbon 165, 9–17 (2020)10.1016/j.carbon.2020.04.021 ↗
95. Q. Zheng, Z. Li, J. Yang, J.-K. Kim, Graphene oxide-based transparent conductive films. Prog. Mater. Sci. 64, 200–247 (2014)10.1016/j.pmatsci.2014.03.004 ↗
96. M. Fu, Z. Zhu, W. Chen, H. Yu, Q. Liu, Microwave-assisted synthesis of MoS2/graphene composites for supercapacitors. J. Mater. Sci. 55, 16385–16393 (2020)10.1007/s10853-020-05201-5 ↗
97. M. Fu et al., Facile synthesis of V2O5/graphene composites as advanced electrode materials in supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compds. 862, 158006 (2021)10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158006 ↗
98. M. Fu et al., In situ growth of manganese ferrite nanorods on graphene for supercapacitors. Ceram. Int. 46, 28200–28205 (2020)10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.07.319 ↗
99. M. Fu et al., Facile synthesis of strontium ferrite nanorods/graphene composites as advanced electrode materials for supercapacitors. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 588, 795–803 (2021)10.1016/j.jcis.2020.11.114 ↗
100. J. Wang et al., Zeolitic imidazolate framework/graphene oxide hybrid nanosheets functionalized thin film nanocomposite membrane for enhanced antimicrobial performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 25508–25519 (2016)10.1021/acsami.6b06992 ↗