Application of the bulge test combined with 3D-DIC for biaxial characterization of PLA films and defect detection
Source abstract
Abstract
The bulge test is a versatile mechanical testing technique widely applied in materials science, engineering, and biomedical research to understand the mechanical behavior of materials and structures. In this study, PLA blown films were characterized through the bulge test, and the corresponding properties were compared to those obtained from uniaxial t!esting. To achieve more accurate and precise deformation measurements, 3D digital image correlation (3D-DIC) was used, offering superior capabilities in terms of accuracy, precision, and non-destructive testing. This technique can detect defects such as cracks, voids, and delamination in materials and structures. During the bulge testing, 3D-DIC was utilized to analyze the strain field evolution within the test sample and identify regions of reduced film thickness. Notably, the results indicated zones with strain concentration aligned parallel to the film machine direction, suggesting localized thickness reduction in those areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical measurement and interference techniques · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory of Electromechanical Systems (LASEM), University of Sfax, National Engineering School of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
Institute for Polymers and Composites, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal
Laboratoire des Sciences des Procédés et des Matériaux (LSPM), Université Paris 13 Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France
Funding
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Pinyen L · 1990
2. 10.3390/met1105075110.3390/met11050751 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11340-013-9820-810.1007/s11340-013-9820-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.03910.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.039 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11658910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116589 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10654810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106548 ↗
7. 10.5772/5588910.5772/55889 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.00810.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.008 ↗
9. Tinoco HA. Numerical modeling approach for the assessment of elastic properties of bi- layer thin films measured by bulge test. Proceedings of the tenth international conference of engineering computational technology, New York, NY, 16 October 2022.
10. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.03910.1016/j.tsf.2018.12.039 ↗
11. 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90112-O10.1016/0040-6090(92)90112-O ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2018.04.00510.1016/j.tsf.2018.04.005 ↗
13. 10.1557/JMR.1992.324210.1557/JMR.1992.3242 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.02410.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.024 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00707-017-1945-x10.1007/s00707-017-1945-x ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.09.00210.1016/j.cirpj.2020.09.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1003-6326(12)61719-110.1016/S1003-6326(12)61719-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.11791710.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.117917 ↗
19. Vasilescu M · 2016
20. 10.1088/0022-3727/48/42/42530210.1088/0022-3727/48/42/425302 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.12163210.1016/j.polymer.2019.121632 ↗
22. Pickerd V · 2013
23. 10.1063/1.492664510.1063/1.4926645 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.07210.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.072 ↗
25. 10.1680/cien.11.0004010.1680/cien.11.00040 ↗
26. 10.3390/s1918387910.3390/s19183879 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1103052310.3390/polym11030523 ↗
28. 10.3390/s2223925610.3390/s22239256 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.06.034 ↗
30. Reis LCD · 2015
31. Lucian L · The 14th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming · 2011 · 1434 · 1429
32. 10.1016/0020-7403(72)90020-310.1016/0020-7403(72)90020-3 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11263710.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112637 ↗
34. 10.3390/applmech104001210.3390/applmech1040012 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.02.02310.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.02.023 ↗
36. 10.32604/jrm.2019.0682710.32604/jrm.2019.06827 ↗
37. B FK, Mohamed K, Hilliou L, et al. Characterization of PLA/Palm fiber films by conventional tensile test and digital. 1, 1–10.
38. 10.1007/BF0242797610.1007/BF02427976 ↗