Optimization of molding process parameters for CF/PEEK composites based on Taguchi method
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, nine groups of laminates were prepared according to the Taguchi L 9 (3 3 ) test array to study the influence of three process parameters, including molding pressure, molding temperature, and holding time on the performance of unidirectional carbon fiber/polyetheretherketone (CF/PEEK) laminates. A differential scanning calorimetry test was employed to select a reasonable process parameters range. The transverse tensile strength of the laminates was measured, and the fiber–matrix interfacial bonding behavior of the tested samples was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that the significance of factors to transverse tensile strength were molding temperature, holding time, and molding pressure in sequence. The optimal molding process parameters for CF/PEEK composite laminate were molding temperature of 400°C, molding pressure of 3 MPa, and holding time of 30 min. The optimization results were meaningful for the extension and application of thermoplastic composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Central South University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang WH, Zhao QC, Chang HY, et al. The development of fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite materials from German, Japan and United States based on information processing technology. Appl Mech Mater 2015; 713–715: 2946–2949.
2. 10.1179/174328008X32522310.1179/174328008X325223 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10443-019-09786-210.1007/s10443-019-09786-2 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831667179610.1177/0021998316671796 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2435410.1002/pc.24354 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00107-610.1016/S0266-3538(03)00107-6 ↗
7. 10.1002/stc.49110.1002/stc.491 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.12.009 ↗
9. 10.1177/08927057000130040310.1177/089270570001300403 ↗
10. McCool R, Murphy A, Wilson R, et al. Thermoforming carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt L J Mater Design Appl 2012; 226: 91–102.
11. 10.1002/pc.2460010.1002/pc.24600 ↗
12. Xu Z, Wang G, Hu J, et al. Influence of processing conditions on tensile property of continuous glass fiber–reinforced PEEK composites fabricated by the co-wrapped yarn method. Adv Polym Sci 2017; 30: 489–499.
13. Zuo P, Tcharkhtchi A, Shirinbayan M, et al. Effect of thermal aging on crystallization behaviors and dynamic mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polyphenylene sulfide (PPS/GF) composites. J Polym Res 2020; 27(14): 124–130.
14. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00009-910.1016/S1359-835X(00)00009-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.1040610.1002/app.10406 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.1014110.1002/pc.10141 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2375310.1002/pc.23753 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2004.05.014 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2524110.1002/pc.25241 ↗
20. Rajesh KB, Deepak S. Optimization of FSW parameters for maximum UTS of AA6082/SiC/10p composites. Adv Compos Lett 2019; 28: 1–7.
21. 10.1007/s12221-017-6606-010.1007/s12221-017-6606-0 ↗