journal article·2020-01

A review of high performance polymer nanocomposites for packaging applications in electronics and food industries

Ayesha Kausar

Publisher page

Abstract

This article addresses advances in polymeric nanocomposites for packaging applications. Synthetic and biodegradable polymers have been reinforced with carbon nanotube, graphite, graphene and derived nanofiller, nanoclay, and inorganic nanoparticles to form high performance packaging materials. Polymeric nanocomposites possess markedly improved packaging properties including oxygen permeability, moisture permeability, barrier properties, solvent resistance, thermal stability, biological features, anti-microbial characteristics, non-flammability, and mechanical robustness. Performance of nanocomposite films and packaging is dependent on how well the nanofiller is dispersed in matrices. Modified nanofillers have been used to impart the desired functional properties to the packaging materials. Technical packaging applications in electronics and food and beverage industries are discussed. Using appropriate polymer, functional nanofiller, and fabrication techniques may represent inspiring routes for creating innovative packaging materials with enhanced mechanical, thermal, and barrier performances.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Natural Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. Kausar A. · J Plast Film Sheet · 2019 · 34 · 394
2. 10.1177/875608791877352110.1177/8756087918773521 ↗
3. Rokbani H, Daigle F, Ajji A. Long-and short-term antibacterial properties of low-density polyethylene-based films coated with zinc oxide nanoparticles for potential use in food packaging. J Plast Film Sheet . Epub ahead of print 2 January 2019. DOI: 10.1177/8756087918822677.10.1177/8756087918822677 ↗
4. 10.1177/875608791770733610.1177/8756087917707336 ↗
5. 10.1177/875608791668614110.1177/8756087916686141 ↗
6. 10.1177/875608791456890410.1177/8756087914568904 ↗
7. 10.1177/875608791347785710.1177/8756087913477857 ↗
8. 10.1177/875608791244000010.1177/8756087912440000 ↗
9. 10.1007/s10570-010-9474-y10.1007/s10570-010-9474-y ↗
10. 10.1002/pts.62110.1002/pts.621 ↗
11. Coles R · 2003
12. 10.1080/03602559.2012.76267310.1080/03602559.2012.762673 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0924-2244(02)00280-710.1016/S0924-2244(02)00280-7 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.02710.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.08.027 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.05.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.05.002 ↗
16. 10.1080/0265203050023965610.1080/02652030500239656 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.clay.2012.01.01610.1016/j.clay.2012.01.016 ↗
18. Gilman JW · SAMPE J · 1997 · 33 · 40
19. Harcup JP, Yee AF. Deformation and fracture of polymer silicate layer nanocomposites. In: Society of plastics engineers . vol. 3. In: Proceedings of the conference ANTEC'99 , 2–6 May 1999, New York City, pp.3396–3398.
20. 10.1021/ma010780b10.1021/ma010780b ↗
21. 10.1080/00914037.2011.58422110.1080/00914037.2011.584221 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.04210.1016/j.polymer.2006.12.042 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.1098610.1002/app.10986 ↗
24. Penaloza DPJr, Ap Seery T. Silylated functionalized montmorillonite clay for nanocomposite preparation. Epitoanyag – JSBCM . Epub ahead of print 24 May 2018. DOI: 10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2018.26.10.14382/epitoanyag-jsbcm.2018.26 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.07.008 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.00810.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.02210.1016/j.jiec.2014.03.022 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.03.00710.1016/j.carbon.2010.03.007 ↗
29. 10.1039/c0jm04007j10.1039/c0jm04007j ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.02210.1016/j.compscitech.2017.01.022 ↗
31. 10.1021/es301377y10.1021/es301377y ↗
32. 10.1021/ie401716n10.1021/ie401716n ↗
33. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.01610.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.016 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.04210.1016/j.polymer.2010.11.042 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.02610.1016/j.memsci.2016.05.026 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.00610.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.006 ↗
37. 10.1007/s13233-013-1124-410.1007/s13233-013-1124-4 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.06.00410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.06.004 ↗
39. Bumbudsanpharoke N, Ko S. Nanoclays in food and beverage packaging. J Nanomater 2019; Article ID 8927167.10.1155/2019/8927167 ↗
40. 10.1007/978-3-319-99602-8_1410.1007/978-3-319-99602-8_14 ↗
41. Wang JH, Chen F, Wideman GJ, et al. Inventors; Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., Assignee. Nanocomposite packaging film. Patent Application 15/107,613, USA, 20 November 2008.
42. 10.1002/app.4721410.1002/app.47214 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2003.08.002 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.01710.1016/j.polymer.2008.04.017 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.01.02710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.01.027 ↗
46. 10.3390/jfb904006010.3390/jfb9040060 ↗
47. Battegazzore D, Sattin A, Maspoch ML, et al. Mechanical and barrier properties enhancement in film extruded bio‐polyamides with modified nanoclay. Polym Compos . Epub ahead of print 17 October 2018. DOI: 10.1002/pc.25056.10.1002/pc.25056 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.02210.1016/j.tifs.2018.07.022 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.02410.1016/j.foodchem.2004.10.024 ↗
50. 10.1038/s41598-018-28884-y10.1038/s41598-018-28884-y ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.05.03110.1016/j.jcou.2018.05.031 ↗
52. 10.1002/app.4650610.1002/app.46506 ↗
53. 10.1002/pen.2021910.1002/pen.20219 ↗
54. 10.1002/polb.1054610.1002/polb.10546 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.01310.1016/j.porgcoat.2008.08.013 ↗
56. 10.1002/app.3424810.1002/app.34248 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jksus.2016.05.00410.1016/j.jksus.2016.05.004 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.483194610.1063/1.4831946 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.10.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2013.10.018 ↗
60. 10.1109/MEI.2011.595406410.1109/MEI.2011.5954064 ↗
61. 10.1063/1.473332410.1063/1.4733324 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.00210.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.002 ↗
63. 10.1002/pc.2016010.1002/pc.20160 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2011.07.01110.1016/j.synthmet.2011.07.011 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.04410.1016/j.carbpol.2012.03.044 ↗
66. 10.1147/rd.451.001110.1147/rd.451.0011 ↗
67. 10.1038/scientificamerican0204-7610.1038/scientificamerican0204-76 ↗
68. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/42/42401710.1088/0957-4484/18/42/424017 ↗
69. Nachay K. · Food Technol · 2007 · 61 · 34
70. 10.1007/s13197-015-1766-710.1007/s13197-015-1766-7 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.02.003 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.01810.1016/j.compscitech.2014.01.018 ↗
73. 10.1166/jnn.2008.24810.1166/jnn.2008.248 ↗
74. 10.1002/pts.83410.1002/pts.834 ↗
75. 10.1016/B978-012311632-1/50038-310.1016/B978-012311632-1/50038-3 ↗
76. Youssef AM · Trans Egypt Soc Chem Eng · 2011 · 37 · 36
77. 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.4610.3144/expresspolymlett.2009.46 ↗
78. 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00032-110.1016/S0924-2244(99)00032-1 ↗
79. 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00126.x ↗
80. 10.1016/B978-012311632-1/50038-310.1016/B978-012311632-1/50038-3 ↗
81. 10.1080/1040839060084636610.1080/10408390600846366 ↗
82. 10.1109/33.20694310.1109/33.206943 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.microrel.2008.02.00310.1016/j.microrel.2008.02.003 ↗
84. 10.1016/S0026-2714(02)00087-210.1016/S0026-2714(02)00087-2 ↗
85. 10.1023/A:102101392191610.1023/A:1021013921916 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.00910.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.009 ↗
87. Ulrich KT · 1995
88. 10.1163/156856108X32051910.1163/156856108X320519 ↗
89. 10.1115/1.279211310.1115/1.2792113 ↗
90. 10.1109/96.65950010.1109/96.659500 ↗
91. 10.1007/978-0-387-78219-510.1007/978-0-387-78219-5 ↗
92. 10.1115/1.132467510.1115/1.1324675 ↗
93. 10.1109/TPEL.2010.204937710.1109/TPEL.2010.2049377 ↗
94. 10.1109/TIA.2011.218129010.1109/TIA.2011.2181290 ↗