journal article·2019-04-09Open access

Managing uncertainty in data-derived densities to accelerate density functional theory

Andrew T Fowler, Chris J Pickard, James A Elliott

Journal of Physics: Materials· Volume 2· Issue 3

Abstract

Faithful representations of atomic environments and general models for regression can be harnessed to learn electron densities that are close to the ground state. One of the applications of data-derived electron densities is orbital-free density functional theory (DFT). However, extrapolations of densities learned from a training set to dissimilar structures could result in inaccurate results, which would limit the applicability of the method. Here, we show that a non-Bayesian approach can produce estimates of uncertainty which can successfully distinguish accurate from inaccurate predictions of electron density. We apply our approach to DFT where we initialise calculations with data-derived densities only when we are confident about their quality. This results in a guaranteed acceleration to self-consistency for configurations that are similar to those seen during training and could be useful for sampling-based methods, where previous ground state densities cannot be used to initialise subsequent calculations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.470454610.1063/1.4704546 ↗
2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.89710.1103/RevModPhys.87.897 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.7.191210.1103/PhysRevB.7.1912 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr200107z10.1021/cr200107z ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.45002510.1063/1.450025 ↗
7. 10.1557/jmr.2017.46210.1557/jmr.2017.462 ↗
8. 10.1103/RevModPhys.64.104510.1103/RevModPhys.64.1045 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.25300210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.253002 ↗
10. 10.1002/qua.2504010.1002/qua.25040 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-017-00839-310.1038/s41467-017-00839-3 ↗
12. Sinitskiy A V · 2018
13. 10.1021/acscentsci.8b0055110.1021/acscentsci.8b00551 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11222-010-9198-810.1007/s11222-010-9198-8 ↗
15. Bishop C M · Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning · 2006
16. 10.1038/nature1454110.1038/nature14541 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.01.03410.1016/j.jcp.2016.01.034 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.01610.1016/j.jcp.2016.07.016 ↗
19. 10.1029/2018WR02352810.1029/2018WR023528 ↗
20. Longbottom S · Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2019 · 2710.1088/1361-651X/ab0d75 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b1168910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b11689 ↗
22. Bartók A P · 2010
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.18411510.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
24. 10.1098/rsta.1896.000710.1098/rsta.1896.0007 ↗
25. Lakshminarayanan B · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017) · 2017
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.05410.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.054 ↗
27. Wu A · 2018
28. 10.1017/CBO9780511569920.01710.1017/CBO9780511569920.017 ↗
29. Woods N · 2018
30. 10.3390/i304036010.3390/i3040360 ↗
31. 10.1021/cr200464710.1021/cr2004647 ↗
32. 10.1016/0009-2614(94)01221-010.1016/0009-2614(94)01221-0 ↗
33. 10.1002/qua.2430910.1002/qua.24309 ↗
34. 10.1524/zkri.220.5.567.6507510.1524/zkri.220.5.567.65075 ↗
35. 10.1002/jcc.2105710.1002/jcc.21057 ↗
36. 10.1093/nar/gkr90010.1093/nar/gkr900 ↗
37. 10.1080/0889311041000166488210.1080/08893110410001664882 ↗