Rotating magnetocaloric effect in polycrystals—harnessing the demagnetizing effect
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Climate change and the increasing demand for energy globally have motivated the search for a more sustainable heat-pumping technology. Magnetic refrigeration stands as one of the most promising alternative technologies for clean and efficient heat pumps of the future. The rotating magnetocaloric effect (RMCE) has previously been studied in materials with magnetocrystalline anisotropy due to its potential to improve devices by requiring only a single magnetic field region, but these materials are fragile and costly to obtain, making them inviable for applications. It has been shown that by exploiting the demagnetizing effect, an RMCE is, in fact, attainable in any polycrystalline magnetocaloric sample with an asymmetric shape, without requiring magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Using gadolinium as a case study, we provide a theoretical framework for computing the demagnetizing field-based RMCE and present thorough experimental verification for different magnetic field intensities and a wide temperature range. Direct measurements of the RMCE in gadolinium reveal that a significant adiabatic temperature difference (1.2 K) and refrigerant capacity (7.44 J kg−1) can be attained within low magnetic field amplitudes (0.4 T). Utilizing lower magnetic field intensities in a magnetocaloric heat pump can significantly diminish the need for permanent magnet materials, thus reducing the overall device cost, size, and weight, ultimately enhancing the feasibility of mass-producing such devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Multiferroics and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Ozone Secretariat · 2018
2. Ozone Secretariat · 2016
3. The Role of Refrigeration in the Global Economy
4. Franco · Pro. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 93 · 11210.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.005 ↗
5. Kitanovski · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2020 · 1010.1002/aenm.201903741 ↗
6. Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, U.S.D.o.E · 2016
7. European Commission · 202210.3030/190183588 ↗
8. European Commission · 202310.3030/101101461 ↗
9. Yu · Int. J. Refrig. · 2010 · 33 · 102910.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.04.002 ↗
10. Greco · Int. J. Refrig. · 2019 · 106 · 6610.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.06.034 ↗
11. Russek · Int. J. Refrig. · 2006 · 29 · 136610.1016/j.ijrefrig.2006.07.019 ↗
12. Kitanovski · 201510.1007/978-3-319-08741-2 ↗
13. Teyber · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 442 · 8710.1016/j.jmmm.2017.06.039 ↗
14. Tura · Int. J. Refrig. · 2011 · 34 · 62810.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.12.009 ↗
15. Masche · Appl. Therm. Eng. · 2022 · 20410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117947 ↗
16. Landau · Phys. Rev. B · 1971 · 3 · 231010.1103/PhysRevB.3.2310 ↗
17. Barclay · Cryogenics · 1980 · 20 · 46710.1016/0011-2275(80)90081-8 ↗
18. Kuz’min · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 24 · 203910.1088/0022-3727/24/11/020 ↗
19. Nikitin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.137205 ↗
20. Jin · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 8510.1103/PhysRevB.85.214426 ↗
21. Balli · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2017 · 410.1063/1.4983612 ↗
22. de Oliveira · Phys. Rep. · 2010 · 489 · 8910.1016/j.physrep.2009.12.006 ↗
23. Jin · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 8510.1103/PhysRevB.85.214426 ↗
24. Skokov · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2016 · 52 · 110.1109/TMAG.2016.2530138 ↗
25. Balli · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 10810.1063/1.4943109 ↗
26. Moon · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 9810.1103/PhysRevB.98.174424 ↗
27. Konieczny · Dalton Trans. · 2022 · 51 · 1276210.1039/D2DT01565J ↗
28. Zhang · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 510.1038/srep11929 ↗
29. Hu · Solid State Commun. · 2017 · 250 · 4510.1016/j.ssc.2016.11.015 ↗
30. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 193 · 21010.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.031 ↗
31. Wei · J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 87410.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159755 ↗
32. Zhou · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2022 · 12010.1063/5.0088571 ↗
33. Barclay · 1984
34. Badosa · J. Appl. Phys. · 2023 · 13410.1063/5.0161334 ↗
35. Aharoni · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 343210.1063/1.367113 ↗
36. Smith · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2012 · 2 · 128810.1002/aenm.201200167 ↗
37. Amorim · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 3210.1088/1361-6501/ac0d23 ↗
38. Inácio · 2022
39. Zhou · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 9610.1103/PhysRevLett.96.120201 ↗
40. Turek · J. Phys. · 2003 · 15 · 277110.1088/0953-8984/15/17/327 ↗
41. Petersen · J. Phys. · 2006 · 18 · 702110.1088/0953-8984/18/30/007 ↗
42. Harmon · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1995 · 56 · 152110.1016/0022-3697(95)00122-0 ↗
43. Shick · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 1076310.1103/PhysRevB.60.10763 ↗
44. Hill · J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. F · 1987 · 17 · 186710.1088/0305-4608/17/9/013 ↗
45. Kastil · Appl. Phys. A · 2011 · 104 · 20510.1007/s00339-010-6105-2 ↗
46. Kamilov · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 441310.1088/0022-3727/40/15/004 ↗
47. Tishin · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 310 · 280010.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1056 ↗
48. Franco · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 10610.1063/1.3261843 ↗
49. Bahl · J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 10510.1063/1.3056220 ↗
50. Kuzmin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 9910.1063/1.3607279 ↗
51. Benford · J. Appl. Phys. · 1981 · 52 · 211010.1063/1.329633 ↗
52. Dan’kov · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 347810.1103/PhysRevB.57.3478 ↗
53. GschneidnerJr · Rep. Prog. Phys. · 2005 · 68 · 147910.1088/0034-4885/68/6/R04 ↗
54. Wang · Intermetallics · 2020 · 11810.1016/j.intermet.2019.106676 ↗
55. Ilyn · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 10910.1063/1.3563583 ↗
56. Su · J. Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 12710.1063/1.5124549 ↗