2024 roadmap on membrane desalination technology at the water-energy nexus
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Water and energy are two strategic drivers of sustainable development, intimately interlaced and vital for a secure future of humanity. Given that water resources are limited, whereas global population and energy demand are exponentially growing, the competitive balance between these resources, referred to as the water-energy nexus, is receiving renewed focus. The desalination industry alleviates water stress by producing freshwater from saline sources, such as seawater, brackish or groundwater. Since the last decade, the market has been dominated by membrane desalination technology, offering significant advantages over thermal processes, such as lower energy demand, easy process control and scale-up, modularity for flexible productivity, and feasibility of synergic integration of different membrane operations. Although seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) accounts for more than 70% of the global desalination capacity, it is circumscribed by some significant technological limitations, such as: (i) the relatively low water recovery factor (around 50%) due to the negative impact of osmotic and polarization phenomena; (ii) an energy consumption in the range of 3–5 kWh m−3, still far from the theoretical energy demand (1.1 kWh m−3) to produce potable water from seawater (at 50% water recovery factor). Ultimately, desalination is an energy intensive practice and research efforts are oriented toward the development of alternative and more energy-efficient approaches in order to enhance freshwater resources without placing excessive strain on limited energy supplies. Recent years have seen a relevant surge of interest in membrane distillation (MD), a thermally driven membrane desalination technology having the potential to complement SWRO in the logic of Process Intensification and Zero Liquid Discharge paradigm. Due to its peculiar transport mechanism and negligibility of osmotic phenomena, MD allows high-quality distillate production (theoretically, non-volatile species are completely rejected) with a recovery factor of up to 80% at a relatively low operative temperature (typically 60 °C–80 °C). Although low operative temperatures make MD technology attractive for renewable power applications (e.g. solar thermal, wind or geothermal energy sources) or for efficient exploitation of low-grade or waste heat streams, the low energy efficiency intrinsically due to heat losses—and specifically to temperature polarization—has so far hindered the application at industrial scale. Nowadays, photothermal materials able to absorb and convert natural or artificial irradiation into heat have gained great attention, demonstrating the potential to mitigate the ‘anthropic’ energy input to MD and to mitigate the impact of thermal inefficiencies. On this road, a step-change improvement in light-to-heat conversion is expected through high-throughput computational screening over thermoplasmonic materials based on electronic and optical properties of advanced materials including novel topological phases of matter used as nanofillers in polymeric membranes. Coherently with the concept of Circular Economy, waste hypersaline solutions rejected from desalination process (referred as ‘brine’) are now the subject of valorization activities along two main exploitation routes: (1) recovery of valuable minor and trace metals and minerals, with special focus on critical raw materials (including, among others, Mg, Na, Ca, K, Sr, Li, Br, B, and Rb); (2) production of salinity gradient power (SGP) renewable energy resulting from the recovery of the Gibbs energy of mixing (mainly represented by the entropic contribution) of two solutions having different ionic concentration. The exciting new frontier of sustainable mining of seawater concentrates is accelerating the appearance of a plethora of innovative membrane materials and methods for brine dehydration and selective extraction of trace ions, although under the sword of Damocles represented by cost feasibility for reliable commercial application. On the other hand, among several emerging technologies, reverse electrodialysis (SGP-RED) was already proven capable—at least at the kW scale–of turning the chemical potential difference between river water, brackish water, and seawater into electrical energy. Efforts to develop a next generation of ion exchange membranes exhibiting high perm-selectivity (especially toward monovalent ions) and low electrical resistance, to improve system engineering and to optimize operational conditions, pursue the goal of enhancing the low power density so far achievable (in the order of a few W per m2). This Roadmap takes the form of a series of short contributions written independently by worldwide experts in the topic. Collectively, such contributions provide a comprehensive picture of the current state of the art in membrane science and technology at the water-energy nexus, and how it is expected to develop in the future. In addition, this Roadmap acknowledges the challenges and advances in membrane systems, particularly emphasizing the interplay of material innovation and system optimization, which collectively contribute to advancing the desalination field within the water-energy nexus framework.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Membrane Separation Technologies · Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques · Solar-Powered Water Purification Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Janus membranes at the water-energy nexus: a critical review10.1016/j.cis.2023.102937 ↗
2. Energy duty in direct contact membrane distillation of hypersaline brines operating at the water-energy nexus10.1016/j.memsci.2023.121585 ↗
3. Hybrid desalination technologies for sustainable water-energy nexus: innovation in integrated membrane module development10.5004/dwt.2022.28193 ↗
4. Mining nontraditional water sources for a distributed hydrogen economy10.1021/acs.est.2c02439 ↗
5. Membrane research beyond materials science10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119902 ↗
6. Thinking the future of membranes: perspectives for advanced and new membrane materials and manufacturing processes10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117761 ↗
7. The upper bound of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes for desalination10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117297 ↗
8. Selectivity of ion exchange membranes: a review10.1016/j.memsci.2018.03.051 ↗
9. Comprehensive review of membrane design and synthesis for membrane distillation10.1016/j.desal.2021.115168 ↗
10. Selective membranes in water and wastewater treatment: role of advanced materials10.1016/j.mattod.2021.06.013 ↗
11. Fabrication of an aquaporin-based forward osmosis membrane through covalent bonding of a lipid bilayer to a microporous support10.1039/C5TA05751E ↗
12. Ultimate osmosis engineered by the pore geometry and functionalization of carbon nanostructures10.1038/srep10597 ↗
13. A novel approach toward fabrication of high performance thin film composite polyamide membranes10.1038/srep22069 ↗
14. Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis for sustainable large-scale hydrogen production10.1002/cnl2.9 ↗
15. Polyamide nanofiltration membrane with highly uniform sub-nanometre pores for sub-1 Å precision separation10.1038/s41467-020-15771-2 ↗
16. Nanoscale control of internal inhomogeneity enhances water transport in desalination membranes10.1126/science.abb8518 ↗
17. Prospective applications of nanometer-scale pore size biomimetic and bioinspired membranes10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118968 ↗
18. 2D material nanofiltration membranes: from fundamental understandings to rational design10.1002/advs.202102493 ↗
19. Biomimetic artificial water channel membranes for enhanced desalination10.1038/s41565-020-00796-x ↗
20. Overview: state-of-the art commercial membranes for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis10.1115/1.4047963 ↗
21. The influence of anion-exchange membrane nanostructure onto ion transport: adjusting membrane performance through fabrication conditions10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121306 ↗
22. Amphiphilic poly (arylene ether sulfone) multiblock copolymers with quaternary ammonium groups for novel thin-film composite nanofiltration membranes10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123446 ↗
23. Membrane materials for selective ion separations at the water–energy nexus10.1002/adma.202101312 ↗
24. Gels as emerging anti-icing materials: a mini review10.1039/D1MH00910A ↗
25. Efficient metal ion sieving in rectifying subnanochannels enabled by metal–organic frameworks10.1038/s41563-020-0634-7 ↗
26. Polymerization of counteranions in the cationic nanopores of a cross-linked lyotropic liquid crystal network to modify ion transport properties10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00244 ↗
27. Advancing ion-exchange membranes to ion-selective membranes: principles, status, and opportunities10.1007/s11783-023-1625-0 ↗
28. Pore wetting in membrane distillation: a comprehensive review10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100843 ↗
29. Low carbon desalination: status and research development, and demonstration needs, report of a workshop conducted at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Association with the Global Clean Water Desalination Alliance (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
30. State-of-the-art of renewable energy sources used in water desalination: present and future prospects10.1016/j.desal.2021.115035 ↗
31. The state of desalination and brine production: a global outlook10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.076 ↗
32. Main technical and economic guidelines to implement wind/solar-powered reverse-osmosis desalination systems10.3390/pr10040653 ↗
33. Integrated pumped hydro reverse osmosis systems10.1016/j.seta.2016.09.003 ↗
34. Techno-economic performances of future concentrating solar power plants in Australia10.1057/s41599-021-01005-3 ↗
35. Variable renewable energy sources for powering reverse osmosis desalination, with a case study of wave powered desalination for Kilifi, Kenya10.1016/j.desal.2020.114669 ↗
36. Desalination and energy consumption. What can we expect in the near future?10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.046 ↗
37. Hybrid desalination processes for beneficial use of reverse osmosis brine: current status and future prospects10.1016/j.desal.2018.02.002 ↗
38. Hybrid semi-batch/batch reverse osmosis (HSBRO) for use in zero liquid discharge (ZLD) applications10.1016/j.desal.2022.116126 ↗
39. Characterization of the use of vacuum enhancement in commercial pilot-scale air gap membrane distillation modules with different designs10.1016/j.desal.2021.115490 ↗
40. The 2021 battery technology roadmap10.1088/1361-6463/abd353 ↗
41. Operational analysis of an innovative wind powered reverse osmosis system installed in the Canary Islands10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00247-0 ↗
42. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: electrical energy storage options for a photovoltaic-powered brackish water desalination system10.3390/app11020856 ↗
43. Analysis of hybrid adiabatic compressed air energy storage-reverse osmosis desalination system with different topological structures10.1016/j.desal.2022.115667 ↗
44. The CSP (concentrated solar power) plant with Brayton cycle: a third generation CSP system10.11648/j.ajme.20200601.16 ↗
45. Variable operation of a renewable energy-driven reverse osmosis system using model predictive control and variable recovery: towards large-scale implementation10.1016/j.desal.2022.115715 ↗
46. Artificial neural networks applied to manage the variable operation of a simple seawater reverse osmosis plant10.1016/j.desal.2017.04.032 ↗
47. Improving the performance of solar membrane distillation processes for treating high salinity feeds: a process control approach for cleaner production10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130446 ↗
48. A comprehensive review of energy consumption of seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113652 ↗
49. Hybrid technologies: the future of energy efficient desalination–a review10.1016/j.desal.2020.114659 ↗
50. Optimisation of renewable energy powered reverse osmosis desalination systems: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.rser.2021.110712 ↗
51. Energy recovery from two-stage SWRO plant using PRO without external freshwater feed stream: theoretical analysis10.1016/j.renene.2016.12.030 ↗
52. Recovery of salinity gradient energy in desalination plants by reverse electrodialysis10.1016/j.desal.2020.114699 ↗
53. Energy utilisation strategy in an offshore floating wind system with variable production of fresh water and hybrid energy storage10.1080/14786451.2022.2067160 ↗
54. Can large-scale offshore membrane desalination cost-effectively and ecologically address water scarcity in the Middle East?10.3390/membranes12030323 ↗
55. The effect of long-term brine discharge from desalination plants on benthic foraminifera10.1371/journal.pone.0227589 ↗
56. Chronic effects of brine discharge from large-scale seawater reverse osmosis desalination facilities on benthic bacteria10.1016/j.watres.2018.12.046 ↗
57. Impact of brine discharge from seawater desalination plants on Persian/Arabian gulf salinity10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001604 ↗
58. Tutorial review of reverse osmosis and electrodialysis10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120221 ↗
59. The relative insignificance of advanced materials in enhancing the energy efficiency of desalination technologies10.1039/D0EE00341G ↗
60. Renewable energy-powered membrane technology: supercapacitors for buffering resource fluctuations in a wind-powered membrane system for brackish water desalination10.1016/j.renene.2012.05.026 ↗
61. Impact of intermittent operation on reverse osmosis membrane fouling for brackish groundwater desalination systems10.1016/j.memsci.2019.04.010 ↗
62. The effect of coagulants and antiscalants discharged with seawater desalination brines on coastal microbial communities: a laboratory and in situ study from the southeastern Mediterranean10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.013 ↗
63. Sustainable desalination: long-term monitoring of brine discharge in the marine environment10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111813 ↗
64. Energy for desalination: a state-of-the-art review10.1016/j.desal.2020.114569 ↗
65. Energy consumption and water production cost of conventional and renewable-energy-powered desalination processes10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.064 ↗
66. Carbon footprint of water reuse and desalination: a review of greenhouse gas emissions and estimation tools10.2166/wrd.2014.058 ↗
67. Advances in seawater desalination technologies10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.067 ↗
68. Environmental and economic analysis for desalinating seawater of high salinity using reverse osmosis: a life cycle assessment approach10.1007/s10668-022-02214-9 ↗
69. Sea water demineralization by means of an osmotic membrane
70. How RO membrane permeability and other performance factors affect process cost and energy use: a review10.1016/j.desal.2019.07.004 ↗
71. Thermophysical properties of seawater: a review of existing correlations and data10.5004/dwt.2010.1079 ↗
72. Aspects of environmental impacts of seawater desalination: cyprus as a case study10.5004/dwt.2021.26916 ↗
73. Sustainable management of brine effluent from desalination plants: the SOL-BRINE system10.1080/19443994.2014.933621 ↗
74. Design of an innovative vacuum evaporator system for brine concentration assisted by software tool simulation10.1080/19443994.2014.948660 ↗
75. Performance increase of membrane distillation pilot scale modules operating in vacuum-enhanced air-gap configuration10.1016/j.desal.2019.114202 ↗
76. CuO/Ag2S/CuS nanohybrids-integrated photoelectric and photothermal effects for ultrasensitive detection of inorganic pyrophosphatase10.1002/adfm.202106854 ↗
77. Nanoengineering palladium plasmonic nanosheets inside polymer nanospheres for photothermal therapy and targeted drug delivery10.1002/adfm.202106932 ↗
78. Cu2−xSx capped AuCu nanostars for efficient plasmonic photothermal tumor treatment in the second near-infrared window10.1002/smll.202103174 ↗
79. Near-infrared II nanoadjuvant-mediated chemodynamic, photodynamic, and photothermal therapy combines immunogenic cell death with PD-L1 blockade to enhance antitumor immunity10.1002/smll.202107809 ↗
80. Near-infrared II plasmonic phototheranostics with glutathione depletion for multimodal imaging-guided hypoxia-tolerant chemodynamic-photocatalytic-photothermal cancer therapy triggered by a single laser10.1002/smll.202105638 ↗
81. Thermo-plasmonics: using metallic nanostructures as nano-sources of heat10.1002/lpor.201200003 ↗
82. Applications and challenges of thermoplasmonics10.1038/s41563-020-0740-6 ↗
83. NIR light-triggered degradable MoTe2 nanosheets for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of cancer10.1002/adfm.201801139 ↗
84. Renal-clearable nickel-doped carbon dots with boosted photothermal conversion efficiency for multimodal imaging-guided cancer therapy in the second near-infrared biowindow10.1002/adfm.202100549 ↗
85. In situ generation of gold nanoparticles on bacteria-derived magnetosomes for imaging-guided starving/chemodynamic/photothermal synergistic therapy against cancer10.1002/adfm.202110063 ↗
86. Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment through second-near-infrared-window photothermal genome editing of PD-L1 mediated by supramolecular gold nanorods for enhanced cancer immunotherapy10.1002/adma.202006003 ↗
87. Targeting heat shock protein 70 using gold nanorods enhances cancer cell apoptosis in low dose plasmonic photothermal therapy10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.06.017 ↗
88. Carrier-free delivery of ultrasmall π-conjugated oligomer nanoparticles with photothermal conversion over 80% for cancer theranostics10.1002/smll.202104521 ↗
89. Polarization-modulated multidirectional photothermal actuators10.1002/adma.202006367 ↗
90. Solar thermoplasmonic nanofurnace for high-temperature heterogeneous catalysis10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00594 ↗
91. Quasi-static resonances in the visible spectrum from all-dielectric intermediate band semiconductor nanocrystals10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03787 ↗
92. Significantly enhanced photothermal catalytic hydrogen evolution over Cu2O-rGO/TiO2 composite with full spectrum solar light10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.136 ↗
93. Urchinlike carbon-coated TiO2 microspheres with enhanced photothermal–photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performance for full-spectrum solar energy conversion10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00918 ↗
94. Solar steam generation on scalable ultrathin thermoplasmonic TiN nanocavity arrays10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105828 ↗
95. Solar steam generation based on the photothermal effect: from designs to applications, and beyond10.1039/C9TA05935K ↗
96. Intensifying heat using MOF‐isolated graphene for solar‐driven seawater desalination at 98% solar‐to‐thermal efficiency10.1002/adfm.202008904 ↗
97. Integrated water and thermal managements in bioinspired hierarchical MXene aerogels for highly efficient solar‐powered water evaporation10.1002/adfm.202111794 ↗
98. Intensifying solar interfacial heat accumulation for clean water generation excluding heavy metal ions and oil emulsions10.1002/solr.202100427 ↗
99. Salt-resistant carbon dots modified solar steam system enhanced by chemical advection10.1016/j.carbon.2021.01.140 ↗
100. Semiconductive, flexible MnO2 NWs/chitosan hydrogels for efficient solar steam generation10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08981 ↗