journal article·2026-07-23

Surface-State-Dependent Electrochemical Behavior in Single-Particle Collision Oxidation of Silver Nanoparticles

Li-Yuan Wu, Lu-Lu Huang, Yu-Xin Yang, Zhi-Ling Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Single-particle collision electrochemistry probes nanoparticle behavior at electrode interfaces through transient current signals generated during particle impact. Because these signals arise from localized nanoparticle-electrode interactions, surface states can strongly influence contact behavior and transient current features. Here, Au ultramicroelectrode (UME) surface states were varied by sequential polishing to examine the collision oxidation of 30 nm Ag nanoparticles (Ag NPs). Rougher UME surface states produced more diverse transient peak shapes, including shoulder-containing, undulating, and multipeak events, indicating more complex particle-electrode contact pathways during collision oxidation. Surface smoothing shifted the responses toward simple asymmetric parabolic peaks, shortened the event duration, and favored more direct oxidation behavior approaching two-electron oxidation. These findings reveal that the electrode surface state modulates the collision oxidation behavior of individual Ag NPs and should be considered during signal analysis to reduce surface-state-induced bias in signal assignment and mechanistic interpretation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Chemistry and Molecular Sciences

Wuhan University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja072344w10.1021/ja072344w ↗
2. 10.1039/C6CP07788A10.1039/C6CP07788A ↗
3. 10.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-11490210.1146/annurev-anchem-061318-114902 ↗
4. 10.1039/D5CS01140J10.1039/D5CS01140J ↗
5. 10.1016/j.coelec.2025.10169410.1016/j.coelec.2025.101694 ↗
6. 10.1002/anie.20110088510.1002/anie.201100885 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b0236510.1021/acs.analchem.6b02365 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0501610.1021/acs.analchem.2c05016 ↗
9. 10.1021/jz100963y10.1021/jz100963y ↗
10. 10.3390/ijms22231313710.3390/ijms222313137 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-020-16149-010.1038/s41467-020-16149-0 ↗
12. 10.1021/la503628h10.1021/la503628h ↗
13. 10.1016/j.coelec.2022.10119510.1016/j.coelec.2022.101195 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn500045m10.1021/nn500045m ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0303310.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03033 ↗
16. 10.1021/acselectrochem.4c0006810.1021/acselectrochem.4c00068 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c0408110.1021/acs.analchem.2c04081 ↗
18. 10.1021/jacs.1c0716410.1021/jacs.1c07164 ↗
19. 10.1021/acssensors.3c0018110.1021/acssensors.3c00181 ↗
20. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)03069-210.1016/0022-0728(93)03069-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0022-0728(98)00025-410.1016/S0022-0728(98)00025-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00574-010.1016/S0013-4686(00)00574-0 ↗
23. 10.1002/celc.20190098910.1002/celc.201900989 ↗
24. 10.1021/jp804742310.1021/jp8047423 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.04810.1016/j.electacta.2016.04.048 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5c0559210.1021/acs.analchem.5c05592 ↗
27. 10.20964/2020.06.1910.20964/2020.06.19 ↗
28. 10.3389/fchem.2020.59393210.3389/fchem.2020.593932 ↗
29. 10.1021/jacs.6b1114310.1021/jacs.6b11143 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.7b0984210.1021/jacs.7b09842 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6SC04582K10.1039/C6SC04582K ↗
32. 10.1039/C6SC04483B10.1039/C6SC04483B ↗
33. 10.1002/celc.20180064010.1002/celc.201800640 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c0511510.1021/acs.analchem.3c05115 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0122610.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01226 ↗
36. 10.1016/0013-4686(65)87012-810.1016/0013-4686(65)87012-8 ↗
37. 10.1126/sciadv.adr646510.1126/sciadv.adr6465 ↗
38. 10.1021/jp066572910.1021/jp0665729 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.03710.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.037 ↗
40. 10.1021/ac034546q10.1021/ac034546q ↗