Role of indenter angle on the plastic deformation underneath a sharp indenter and on representative strains: An experimental and numerical study
Source abstract
Abstract
The subsurface microhardness mapping technique of Chaudhri was utilized to determine the shape, size and distribution of plastic strain underneath conical indenters of varying semi-apex angles, alpha (55 degrees, 65 degrees and 75 degrees). Results show that the elastic-plastic boundary under the indenters is elliptical in nature, contradicting the expanding cavity model, and the ellipticity increases with alpha. The maximum plastic strain immediately under the indenter was found to decrease with increasing alpha. Complementary finite-element analysis was conducted to examine the ability of simulations to capture the experimental observations. A comparison of computational and experimental results indicates that the plastic strain distributions as well as the maximum strains immediately beneath the indenter do not match, suggesting that simulation of sharp indentation requires further detailed studies for complete comprehension. Representative strains, epsilon(r), evaluated as the volume-average strains within the elastic-plastic boundary, decrease with increasing alpha and are in agreement with those estimated by using the dimensional analysis. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Brinell JA. In: 2ieme Congres Internationale Méthodes d’Essai. Paris; 1900.
2. Wahlberg · J Iron Steel Inst · 1901 · 59 · 243
3. Meyer · Z Ver Dtsch Ing · 1908 · 52 · 645
4. Smith · J Iron Steel Inst · 1925 · 61 · 285
5. O’Neill · 1934
6. Tabor · 1951
7. Tabor · Rev Phys Technol · 1970 · 1 · 14510.1088/0034-6683/1/3/I01 ↗
8. Doener · J Mater Res · 1986 · 1 · 60110.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
9. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
10. Yoffe · Philos Mag A-Phys Condens Matter Struct Defects Mech Prop · 1982 · 46 · 617
11. Bhattacharya · Int J Solids Struct · 1988 · 24 · 88110.1016/0020-7683(88)90039-X ↗
12. Giannakopoulos · Int J Solids Struct · 1994 · 31 · 267910.1016/0020-7683(94)90225-9 ↗
13. Cheng · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 84 · 128410.1063/1.368196 ↗
14. Cheng · Appl Phys Lett · 1998 · 73 · 61410.1063/1.121873 ↗
15. Giannakopoulos · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 40 · 119110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
16. Venkatesh · Scripta Mater · 2000 · 42 · 83310.1016/S1359-6462(00)00311-0 ↗
17. Feng · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 292910.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.030 ↗
18. Feng · J Mater Res · 2008 · 204 · 704
19. Ramamurty · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 241710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00095-6 ↗
20. Sridhar · J Appl Phys · 1999 · 85 · 38010.1063/1.369459 ↗
21. Gao · Int J Solids Struct · 2006 · 43 · 219310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.03.062 ↗
22. Bishop · Proc Phys Soc · 1945 · 57 · 14710.1088/0959-5309/57/3/301 ↗
23. Hill · Proc Roy Soc A · 1947 · 188 · 27310.1098/rspa.1947.0009 ↗
24. Hill · 1950
25. Dugdale · J Mech Phys Solids · 1953 · 2 · 1410.1016/0022-5096(53)90023-4 ↗
26. Samuels · J Mech Phys Solids · 1957 · 5 · 12510.1016/0022-5096(57)90056-X ↗
27. Mulhearn · J Mech Phys Solids · 1959 · 7 · 8510.1016/0022-5096(59)90013-4 ↗
28. Dugdale · J Mech Phys Solids · 1958 · 6 · 8510.1016/0022-5096(58)90017-6 ↗
29. Marsh · Proc Roy Soc A · 1964 · 279 · 42010.1098/rspa.1964.0114 ↗
30. Hirst · Proc Roy Soc A · 1969 · 311 · 42910.1098/rspa.1969.0126 ↗
31. Atkins · J Mech Phys Solids · 1965 · 13 · 14910.1016/0022-5096(65)90018-9 ↗
32. Johnson · J Mech Phys Solids · 1970 · 18 · 11510.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
33. Bhattacharya · Int J Solids Struct · 1991 · 27 · 104710.1016/0020-7683(91)90100-T ↗
34. Chaudhri · Philos Mag A · 1996 · 74 · 121310.1080/01418619608239721 ↗
35. Chaudhri · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 304710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00010-X ↗
36. Tabor · Proc Roy Soc A · 1948 · 192 · 24710.1098/rspa.1948.0008 ↗
37. Srikant · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 517110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.032 ↗
38. Cheng · J Mater Res · 2000 · 15 · 283010.1557/JMR.2000.0404 ↗
39. Dicarlo · Int J Numer Methods Eng · 2004 · 60 · 66110.1002/nme.979 ↗
40. Dao · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 389910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
41. Chollacoop · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 371310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00186-1 ↗
42. Chollacoop · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 24710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.030 ↗
43. Ogasawara · J Mater Res · 2005 · 20 · 222510.1557/JMR.2005.0280 ↗
44. Ogasawara · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 6510.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.009 ↗
45. Antunes · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 6910.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.019 ↗
46. Branch · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 648710.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.010 ↗
47. Durst · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 8510.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.85 ↗
48. Vlassak · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 42 · 122310.1016/0022-5096(94)90033-7 ↗
49. Chollacoop · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 423 · 4110.1016/j.msea.2005.12.041 ↗
50. Hosford · 2010
51. Dub · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 107 · 04351010.1063/1.3290970 ↗
52. Chaudhri · J Phys D Appl Phys · 1988 · 21 · 37010.1088/0022-3727/21/2/021 ↗
53. Bahr · Met Mater Trans A · 1996 · 27A · 379310.1007/BF02595628 ↗
54. Qin · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 612710.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.016 ↗
55. Hutchinson · J Mech Phys Solids · 1968 · 16 · 1310.1016/0022-5096(68)90014-8 ↗
56. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1968 · 16 · 110.1016/0022-5096(68)90013-6 ↗
57. Mata · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 14510.1016/S0022-5096(03)00075-9 ↗
58. Bucaille · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 166310.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-2 ↗
59. Harsono1 · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 16 · 06500110.1088/0965-0393/16/6/065001 ↗
60. Cai · J Mater Sci Lett · 1993 · 12 · 30110.1007/BF01910084 ↗
61. Lim · Mech Mater · 2006 · 38 · 121310.1016/j.mechmat.2006.04.006 ↗
62. Tabor · Philos Mag A · 1996 · 74 · 120710.1080/01418619608239720 ↗