On the use of selective Z-pinning in stiffened composite panels to prevent skin/stringer debonding
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites have been widely used in engineering. This paper investigates the effect of composite z-pin (polyimide fiber/epoxy resin) on flexural properties of skin/stringer composite structure with different z-pin densities and diameters. Compared with unpinned specimens, the peak loading and energy absorption of z-pinned specimens are increased by 98% and 9 times, respectively. Parameterized research indicates that the optimal z-pin density is 1.35%. And thin z-pins are beneficial to improve the peak loading and energy absorption, which attributes to more total contact area of z-pins. The statistical results present that z-pin pre-hole inserted (ZPI) process can significantly reduce initial damages of z-pinned specimens compared with Ultrasonically Assisted Z-fiber (UAZ) process. Specifically, the z-pin inclination angle is decreased by 60%, and the initial damages in eye-like zone are prominently reduced. The z-pin makes the specimen exhibit the quasi-brittle behavior under flexural loading by playing a bridging role, which makes the flexural properties of specimens prominently increased. In addition, the “snubbing effect” will enhance the bridging effect of z-pins, but it will lead to inter-fibers debonding, splitting, and shear failure of z-pins.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Xi’an Institute of Applied Optics, Xi’an, China
School of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2018.08.013 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11143510.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111435 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.019 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11629410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116294 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10443-017-9640-610.1007/s10443-017-9640-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.001 ↗
7. 10.3390/aerospace807017810.3390/aerospace8070178 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.05210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.03.052 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.010 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11583410.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115834 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10612810.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106128 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.016 ↗
13. 10.3390/jcs401003110.3390/jcs4010031 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.07210.1016/j.matdes.2014.08.072 ↗
15. 10.1520/CTR10971J10.1520/CTR10971J ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.11.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2005.11.009 ↗
17. Javier TV · Composites Part A · 2011 · 42 · 2082
18. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.01310.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.013 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2011.03.009 ↗
20. 10.1177/00219983000340150210.1177/002199830003401502 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.05210.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.052 ↗
22. 10.1201/9780203492901.ch310.1201/9780203492901.ch3 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.04210.1016/j.compscitech.2018.08.042 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10848610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108486 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.03.004 ↗
26. James KL · 2014
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10841310.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108413 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2022.03.00410.1016/j.aiepr.2022.03.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2006.05.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.001 ↗
31. 10.1080/1537649049049389910.1080/15376490490493899 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2011.08.026 ↗