Coarse-to-Fine Screening of High-Entropy Alloy Electrocatalysts for Thiophene Desulfurization
Source abstract
Abstract
High-entropy alloys (HEAs) present considerable potential for catalytic applications. However, their vast compositional spaces render exhaustive first-principles screening impractical. Herein, a two-stage, coarse-to-fine workflow is introduced, integrating a linear-quadratic (LQ) additive model with a graph neural network (GNN). The approach is applicable wherever reactivity can be captured via DFT-based descriptors. As a demonstrative case, materials are screened for the electrocatalytic desulfurization of thiophene. The additive model is fitted using 150 DFT-evaluated compositions to nominate 1,000 five-component HEAs. Subsequently, 350 additional calculations are employed to train a GNN, which ranks the remaining candidates. Relative to computing 3,500 compositions (representing 30% of the 19-metal space), this strategy reduces DFT cost by 7-fold while preserving ranking fidelity, attaining a mean absolute error of 0.1 eV for the top 50 alloys. The approach accelerates discovery by focusing computational resources on the most informative candidates and is readily transferable to other HEA-catalyzed reactions and descriptor-based discovery workflows.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
PISH, ITMO University, Lomonosova 9, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia
IPKN Department, ITMO University, Lomonosova 9, St. Petersburg 191002, Russia
Funding
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/sciadv.adn287710.1126/sciadv.adn2877 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c0008010.1021/acsmaterialsau.4c00080 ↗
3. 10.1039/D3QM00638G10.1039/D3QM00638G ↗
4. 10.1039/D4TA02271H10.1039/D4TA02271H ↗
5. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.02210.1016/j.fuproc.2012.01.022 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12156210.1016/j.fuel.2021.121562 ↗
7. 10.1002/smll.20240316210.1002/smll.202403162 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2024.11831310.1016/j.jelechem.2024.118313 ↗
9. 10.1002/smsc.20240029610.1002/smsc.202400296 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20240188710.1002/adfm.202401887 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.100665210810.1073/pnas.1006652108 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
13. 10.1103/PRXEnergy.3.04200110.1103/PRXEnergy.3.042001 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0288610.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02886 ↗
15. 10.1038/s43588-020-00006-710.1038/s43588-020-00006-7 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.14510.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.145 ↗
17. 10.20517/jmi.2022.4110.20517/jmi.2022.41 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41524-025-01579-510.1038/s41524-025-01579-5 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-022-21209-010.1038/s41598-022-21209-0 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.abo494010.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0871110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08711 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.molcata.2012.05.01110.1016/j.molcata.2012.05.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.susc.2003.12.01410.1016/j.susc.2003.12.014 ↗
24. 10.1039/C4CP05298F10.1039/C4CP05298F ↗