journal article·2026-04-09

Evaluating MS-ANI vs SS-ANI for Surface Hopping Simulations: A Cyclohexadiene Photochemical Ring-Opening Case Study

Biman Medhi, Madhab Morang, Manabendra Sarma

Publisher page

Abstract

Machine learning potentials (MLPs) can offer a powerful, cost-effective alternative to traditional quantum mechanical (QM) methods for simulating excited-state dynamics. In this work, we present a comprehensive comparison of two MLP models, SS-ANI and MS-ANI, by simulating the photochemical ring-opening dynamics of 1,3-cyclohexadiene (CHD). The ring-opening dynamics were investigated by using a Landau-Zener-based surface hopping algorithm. The training data sets were generated from QM-based surface hopping simulations at the SA-3-CASSCF/cc-pVDZ approach. We show that MS-ANI outperforms SS-ANI in modeling multiple electronic states, yielding more accurate energy predictions, stable energy gaps, and reliable population dynamics. MS-ANI effectively captures interstate correlations and ensures consistent energy profiles, making it robust for surface hopping dynamics. Data set quality and diversity were also found critical, with MS-ANI benefiting most from larger, well-curated data sets. These findings establish MS-ANI as a powerful, scalable approach for sufficiently accurate excited-state simulations in complex photochemical systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati

References (72)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0219610.1021/acs.jpclett.2c02196 ↗
2. 10.1002/chem.20210176410.1002/chem.202101764 ↗
3. 10.1038/4364610.1038/43646 ↗
4. 10.1021/cr030099310.1021/cr0300993 ↗
5. 10.1002/chem.20220328210.1002/chem.202203282 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.orgel.2021.10618510.1016/j.orgel.2021.106185 ↗
7. 10.1039/D1EE00559F10.1039/D1EE00559F ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.99710.1103/PhysRevLett.52.997 ↗
9. Casida, M. E. Recent Advances In Density Functional Methods: (Part I) ; World Scientific: Singapore, 1995; pp 155–192.10.1142/9789812830586_0005 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b1092810.1021/acs.jpca.5b10928 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpca.4c0040610.1021/acs.jpca.4c00406 ↗
12. 10.1002/cphc.20220072710.1002/cphc.202200727 ↗
13. 10.1063/5.020330710.1063/5.0203307 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0003410.1021/acs.jctc.4c00034 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0366410.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03664 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c0021410.1021/acs.jctc.3c00214 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.14300110.1103/PhysRevLett.120.143001 ↗
18. 10.1080/0144235X.2016.120034710.1080/0144235X.2016.1200347 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5SC04786B10.1039/C5SC04786B ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.13550210.1103/PhysRevLett.117.135502 ↗
21. 10.1021/jz502378410.1021/jz5023784 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.45917010.1063/1.459170 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.47132610.1063/1.471326 ↗
24. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-11224510.1146/annurev-physchem-040215-112245 ↗
25. 10.1002/wcms.115810.1002/wcms.1158 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp040627u10.1021/jp040627u ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.01470110.1103/PhysRevA.84.014701 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41586-018-0337-210.1038/s41586-018-0337-2 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.11542110.1103/PhysRevB.77.115421 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0068410.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00684 ↗
31. 10.1039/D0SC04197A10.1039/D0SC04197A ↗
32. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0473610.1021/acsnano.0c04736 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.015924710.1063/5.0159247 ↗
34. 10.1038/s41524-025-01636-z10.1038/s41524-025-01636-z ↗
35. 10.1038/s41570-021-00278-110.1038/s41570-021-00278-1 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)80865-X10.1016/S0003-2670(00)80865-X ↗
37. 10.1039/C6SC05720A10.1039/C6SC05720A ↗
38. 10.1063/1.499799510.1063/1.4997995 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.505431010.1063/1.5054310 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41467-019-10827-410.1038/s41467-019-10827-4 ↗
41. 10.1039/D2DD00102K10.1039/D2DD00102K ↗
42. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.4c0000410.1021/acsphyschemau.4c00004 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.13640310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.18411510.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-018-06169-210.1038/s41467-018-06169-2 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.02.00710.1016/j.cpc.2019.02.007 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.512670110.1063/1.5126701 ↗
48. 10.1038/s41557-020-0527-z10.1038/s41557-020-0527-z ↗
49. 10.1021/jacs.1c0772510.1021/jacs.1c07725 ↗
50. 10.1039/D0SC05610C10.1039/D0SC05610C ↗
51. 10.1002/chem.20220065110.1002/chem.202200651 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.chempr.2024.04.01710.1016/j.chempr.2024.04.017 ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0010710.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00107 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0046810.1021/acs.jctc.4c00468 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0039610.1021/acs.jctc.9b00396 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c0080110.1021/acs.jctc.2c00801 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0001210.1021/acs.jctc.4c00012 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2015.07.02410.1016/j.chemphys.2015.07.024 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.11.11110.1016/j.cplett.2004.11.111 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.05.06710.1016/j.cplett.2009.05.067 ↗
61. 10.1080/00268976.2020.176412010.1080/00268976.2020.1764120 ↗
62. 10.1063/5.029261610.1063/5.0292616 ↗
63. 10.1063/1.44089210.1063/1.440892 ↗
64. 10.1021/j100223a01010.1021/j100223a010 ↗
65. 10.1021/j100377a01210.1021/j100377a012 ↗
66. 10.1063/1.46220910.1063/1.462209 ↗
67. 10.1088/0953-4075/48/16/16400310.1088/0953-4075/48/16/164003 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41467-025-61975-910.1038/s41467-025-61975-9 ↗
69. 10.1016/0003-4916(75)90182-710.1016/0003-4916(75)90182-7 ↗
70. 10.1002/wcms.133110.1002/wcms.1331 ↗
71. Shiozaki, T. BAGEL Brilliantly Advanced General Electronic-structure Library ; http://www.nubakery.org (accessed July 2025).
72. 10.1063/1.509030310.1063/1.5090303 ↗