A study of the damage tolerance of composite-metal hybrid joints reinforced by multiple and penetrative thin pins
Source abstract
Abstract
The application of adhesive bonding technology in aircraft structures can reduce the total wight greatly, but the bonded joints are very sensitive to the possible manufacturing defects and damages during service operations, which makes them difficult to meet the damage tolerance requirements of the current transport airplane structures. In this study, the damage tolerance of composite-metal hybrid joints reinforced by multiple and penetrative thin pins was studied. The damage tolerance performance of the composite-metal joint is supposed to be enhanced by multiple through-the-thickness penetrative thin reinforcements in the bonding region, and the thin reinforcements were bonded together with both the composite and metallic joint plates. Both experimental tests and finite element simulations were conducted to investigate the effects of the through-the-thickness reinforcements on the damage tolerance performance of the joints with and without pre-fabricated disbond defects. Through the comparative analyses, it was found that the penetrative thin pins in the bonding region significantly improved the static load carrying capacity, the failure strain, the fracture energy, and the fatigue lives of the composite-metal bonded joints. Moreover, the reinforcements decreased the sensitivity of the bonded joints to the disbond defects in the bonding region. The damage tolerance performance of the composite-metal adhesively bonded joints was significantly increased by the through-the-thickness penetrative reinforcements and the enhancement mechanism was revealed by the combined analysis of test results and simulation results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.01010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
2. 10.1533/978184569075510.1533/9781845690755 ↗
3. U.S. Department of Transportation – Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) · 2018
4. U.S. Department of Transportation – Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) · 2018
5. Boltless assembling Of Primary Composite Structures (BOPACS). Description of Work. BOPACS, 2012. EU FP7 Research Project: Boltless assembling Of Primary Composite Structures (BOPACS). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/314180 (Accessed 2022).
6. Kruse T, Körwien T, Heckner S, et al. Bonding of CFRP primary aerospace structures-crackstopping in composite bonded joints under fatigue. In: 20th International Conference on Composite Materials. Copenhagen, 19–24 July 2015.
7. Holzhüter D, Löbel T, Hühne C, et al. The Adhesive Zone Mix Disbond Arrest Feature Results (EU-FP7 Project BOPACS). Meeting on Use of Bonded Joints in Military Applications, Turin, Italy, 15-16 April, 2018.
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.05.023 ↗
9. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970919)65:12<2419::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970919)65:12<2419::AID-APP14>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
10. 10.2514/6.2003-144010.2514/6.2003-1440 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.001 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.00510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.08.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.02510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.09910.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.099 ↗
16. Khan MA, Kumar S. Migrating edge effects in adhesively bonded composite tubular lap joints under axial, pressure and torsional loading via stiffness-tailoring. In: 21st International Conference on Composite Materials, Xi’an, 20–25 August 2017.
17. Chi HEC, Gray P, Lin KY. Design and Optimization of an Axial Mode II Crack Arrest Specimen. In: Aiaa/asme/asce/ahs/asc Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, 23–26 April 2012.
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.001 ↗
19. 10.2514/6.2014-138010.2514/6.2014-1380 ↗
20. Kumar NJ · Appl Compos Mater · 2017 · 25 · 1
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.012 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.10.00310.1016/j.tafmec.2015.10.003 ↗
23. Tu W · Rare Metal Mat Eng · 2009 · 38 · 134
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.08510.1016/j.compositesb.2012.01.085 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.02010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.020 ↗
27. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.88310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.825-826.883 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.03610.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.036 ↗
29. 10.1177/089270571141281410.1177/0892705711412814 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2015.12.023 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.01910.1016/j.compstruct.2014.07.019 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2017.03.019 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.01510.1016/j.compositesa.2017.09.015 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.02010.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.020 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.02210.1016/j.compstruct.2013.11.022 ↗
36. 10.2514/6.2012-189310.2514/6.2012-1893 ↗
37. 10.1177/002199831770802110.1177/0021998317708021 ↗
38. 10.1007/s12567-019-00251-110.1007/s12567-019-00251-1 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.11110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.111 ↗
40. ASTM International · 2010
41. ASTM International · 2017
42. ASTM International · 2014
43. ASTM International · 2012
44. Hibbitt D · 2014