journal article·2025-05-01Open access

Promoting Electrochemical Reversibility: Concave versus Convex Electrodes

Haotian Chen, Huanxin Li, Bedřich Smetana, Vlastimil Novák, Richard G. Compton

Abstract

The importance of electrode shape, alongside electrode size, as key factors in controlling the reversibility or otherwise of electrochemical responses, is recognized at the microscopic level but is explored here via finite-element simulation on the macroscopic scale. Reduced overpotential is seen for concave surfaces relative to flat or convex surfaces, providing an unexplored avenue for the design and fabrication of electrodes, including composites for diverse applications where enhanced reversibility is desirable, such as in sensors and battery materials where the promotion of electrocatalytic responses is important.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Michigan Institute for Data and AI in Society, University of Michigan, 500 Church Street, Suite 600, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1042, United States

Electrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering

University College London

Department of Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QZ, Great Britain

Department of Chemistry and Physico-chemical processes, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, VSB - Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic

Funding

Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Telovýchovy · Schmidt Futures

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Braun A. · 201810.1515/9783110561838 ↗
2. 10.1515/978311058916010.1515/9783110589160 ↗
3. Zhang X. · 2011
4. 10.1142/q047110.1142/q0471 ↗
5. Compton R. G. · 2025
6. Compton R. G. · 202010.1142/q0246 ↗
7. 10.1515/pac-2014-502610.1515/pac-2014-5026 ↗
8. 10.1515/pac-2014-502510.1515/pac-2014-5025 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2018.08.01810.1016/j.jelechem.2018.08.018 ↗
10. 10.1002/anie.20241274510.1002/anie.202412745 ↗
11. 10.1021/acscatal.0c0360210.1021/acscatal.0c03602 ↗
12. 10.1002/anie.20191234810.1002/anie.201912348 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14369410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143694 ↗
14. 10.1021/acscatal.4c0163710.1021/acscatal.4c01637 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.11510.1016/j.jcis.2023.10.115 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c0193210.1021/acs.jpclett.4c01932 ↗
17. 10.1002/cctc.20090028310.1002/cctc.200900283 ↗
18. 10.1021/cr900055f10.1021/cr900055f ↗
19. 10.1002/cssc.20230185910.1002/cssc.202301859 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.409410.1103/PhysRevLett.70.4094 ↗
21. 10.1021/j100057a02010.1021/j100057a020 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)03069-210.1016/0022-0728(93)03069-2 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-0728(95)03971-I10.1016/0022-0728(95)03971-I ↗
24. 10.1021/jp963141p10.1021/jp963141p ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-0728(03)00039-110.1016/S0022-0728(03)00039-1 ↗
26. 10.1021/jp075525t10.1021/jp075525t ↗
27. Rama K. · J. Indian Inst. Sci. · 2016 · 96 · 365
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.04610.1016/j.electacta.2017.10.046 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0293510.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02935 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0869010.1021/acs.jpcc.2c08690 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c0033210.1021/acs.jpca.3c00332 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c0229710.1021/acs.jpcc.4c02297 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.11360210.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113602 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.11414910.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114149 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.elecom.2021.10707110.1016/j.elecom.2021.107071 ↗
36. 10.1016/0022-0728(91)80032-L10.1016/0022-0728(91)80032-L ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.11611410.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116114 ↗
38. 1998 · 32