An insight on optimization of FSP process parameters for the preparation of AA5083/(SiC-Gr) hybrid surface composites using the response surface methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
Aluminum alloys are known for their extensive use in aerospace, automobile, marine, etc., industries due to their excellent inherent properties. Recent studies have developed different methods to modify the surface properties of aluminum by producing surface composites, such as the friction stir processing (FSP) method. The current study made an effort to develop a new hybrid surface composite of AA5083/(SiC-Gr) using the FSP method. For FSP process optimization, the response surface methodology (RSM) has been used. For creating the mathematical model using RSM, various input process parameters of the FSP are selected to predict the output characteristics of the prepared hybrid composite. A Box–Behnken design was used for the process with four factors, each factor was used with three levels, and the RSM was utilized to form a regression model to predict the responses. The ANOVA analysis suggests that NoP (number of passes): 3 and RV (reinforcement volume): 75:25 (SiC: Gr) ratio are the significant parameters of the study with a p-value less than .05. The novelty of this study lies in the development of a new hybrid surface composite of AA5083/(SiC-Gr) using the friction stir processing (FSP) method, with optimization achieved through the response surface methodology (RSM) and multi-objective selection criteria, resulting in predicted outcomes within a range of ±10% of the experimental observations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Technology, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India
Department of Mechanical Engineering, CT University, Sidhwan Khurd, India
School of Engineering, D Y Patil International University, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Institute for Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Universität der Bundeswehr München Neubiberg, Munich, Germany
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11661-007-9459-010.1007/s11661-007-9459-0 ↗
2. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.357-359.50710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.357-359.507 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00329-210.1016/S1359-6462(99)00329-2 ↗
4. 10.1007/s00170-019-03855-310.1007/s00170-019-03855-3 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.30910.1016/j.matpr.2015.07.309 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-3-030-63986-0_110.1007/978-3-030-63986-0_1 ↗
7. 10.1515/9783110315448.17910.1515/9783110315448.179 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.acme.2017.06.00210.1016/j.acme.2017.06.002 ↗
9. 10.1080/01694243.2021.193883510.1080/01694243.2021.1938835 ↗
10. 10.1080/14484846.2021.202257710.1080/14484846.2021.2022577 ↗
11. 10.1080/01694243.2022.203705410.1080/01694243.2022.2037054 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.triboint.2019.10606210.1016/j.triboint.2019.106062 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.04110.1016/j.wear.2019.01.041 ↗
14. 10.21608/JPME.2018.4065210.21608/JPME.2018.40652 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.00110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.001 ↗
16. Arulmoni V · Int J Adv Res Innov · 2015 · 3 · 189
17. 10.1115/1.404959010.1115/1.4049590 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.01.00510.1016/j.wear.2010.01.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.wear.2012.01.00910.1016/j.wear.2012.01.009 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.02510.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.025 ↗
21. 10.1080/10426914.2020.181389710.1080/10426914.2020.1813897 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.02110.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.021 ↗
23. 10.2320/matertrans.M200909210.2320/matertrans.M2009092 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.05.01910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.05.019 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.03510.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.035 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mspro.2012.06.01510.1016/j.mspro.2012.06.015 ↗
27. Gupta K · 2021
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.12710.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.127 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.11710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.117 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-3-642-25859-6_110.1007/978-3-642-25859-6_1 ↗
31. Barman PTK · 2016 · 135
32. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.00710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.007 ↗
33. 10.1080/2374068X.2021.195392310.1080/2374068X.2021.1953923 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.25610.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.256 ↗
35. 10.24425/amm.2023.14244310.24425/amm.2023.142443 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.18210.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.182 ↗
37. 10.1134/S0031918X2110058610.1134/S0031918X21100586 ↗
38. 10.1088/1757-899X/1136/1/01207110.1088/1757-899X/1136/1/012071 ↗
39. 10.1177/0954405421104070510.1177/09544054211040705 ↗
40. 10.1002/mawe.20200020510.1002/mawe.202000205 ↗
41. 10.1016/J.JMAPRO.2023.01.08410.1016/J.JMAPRO.2023.01.084 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.31810.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.318 ↗
43. 10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.10341910.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.103419 ↗
44. 10.1016/J.MATCHAR.2022.11221510.1016/J.MATCHAR.2022.112215 ↗
45. 10.1080/00224065.1980.1198096810.1080/00224065.1980.11980968 ↗