Phase field study of grain boundary effects on spinodal decomposition
Source abstract
Abstract
We have developed a phase field model of a polycrystalline alloy by combining the Cahn–Hilliard model [J Chem Phys 28 (1958) 258] with a model of polycrystals due to Fan and Chen [Acta Mater 45 (1997) 3297]. We have used this model to study grain boundary (GB) effects on spinodal decomposition (SD) in two-dimensional (2D) systems. In binary A–B systems with constant atomic mobility, when the GB-energy $(\gamma\alpha)$ of the A-rich $\alpha$ phase is lower than that $(\gamma\beta)$ of the B-rich $\beta$ phase, decomposition starts by enriching the GB with species A, setting off a composition wave that produces alternating $\alpha$ and $\beta$ bands near the GB. Simultaneously, the grain interiors undergo normal SD. Thus, when decomposition ends, GB-bands coexist with grain interiors with spinodal microstructure. The number of GB bands is rationalized in terms of $(\gamma\beta - \gamma\alpha)$ and the rate of SD in the grain interior. Further, during decomposition, grain growth is effectively suppressed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Cahn · J. Chem. Phys. · 1958 · 28 · 25810.1063/1.1744102 ↗
2. Fan · Acta Mater. · 1997 · 45 · 329710.1016/S1359-6454(97)00022-0 ↗
3. Binder · 2001
4. Binder · 1991 · 5
5. Fratzl · J. Stat. Phys. · 1999 · 95 · 142910.1023/A:1004587425006 ↗
6. Bray · Adv. Phys. · 1994 · 43 · 35710.1080/00018739400101505 ↗
7. Ball · J. Phys.: Cond. Matter · 1990 · 2 · 1030310.1088/0953-8984/2/51/006 ↗
8. Marko · Phys. Rev. E · 1993 · 48 · 2681
9. Bastea · Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 63 · 04151310.1103/PhysRevE.63.041513 ↗
10. Frisch · Phys. Rev. E · 1995 · 52 · 84810.1103/PhysRevE.52.2848 ↗
11. Puri · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 179710.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1797 ↗
12. Puri · Phys. Rev. E · 1997 · 56 · 699110.1103/PhysRevE.56.6991 ↗
13. Puri · J. Stat. Phys. · 1994 · 77 · 14510.1007/BF02186836 ↗
14. Fischer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 89310.1103/PhysRevLett.79.893 ↗
15. Geng · Surf. Sci. · 1996 · 355 · 22910.1016/0039-6028(95)01045-9 ↗
16. Geoghegan · Phys. Rev. E · 2000 · 62 · 94010.1103/PhysRevE.62.940 ↗
17. Hu · Acta Mater. · 2001 · 49 · 46310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00331-1 ↗
18. Moore · Acta Mater. · 2002 · 50 · 94310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00394-9 ↗
19. Reedhill · 1991
20. Cahn · Acta Metall. · 1961 · 9 · 79510.1016/0001-6160(61)90182-1 ↗
21. Tikare · Acta Mater. · 1999 · 47 · 36310.1016/S1359-6454(98)00313-9 ↗
22. Phillips · 2001
23. Allen · Acta Metall. · 1979 · 27 · 108510.1016/0001-6160(79)90196-2 ↗
24. Zhu · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 60 · 356410.1103/PhysRevE.60.3564 ↗
25. Shewmon · 1989
26. Kobayashi · Physica D · 1993 · 63 · 41010.1016/0167-2789(93)90120-P ↗
27. Abinandanan · Phil. Mag. A · 2001 · 81 · 245710.1080/01418610110038420 ↗
28. Kazaryan · 2000 · 89
29. Kobayashi · Physica D · 2000 · 140 · 14110.1016/S0167-2789(00)00023-3 ↗
30. Ramanarayan H, Abinandanan TA. 2003 [Submitted to Acta Mater].10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00301-X ↗
31. Gust · Z Metall. · 1976 · 67 · 110
32. Zhao · Met. Trans. A · 1999 · 30A · 707
33. Gronsky · Acta Metall. · 1975 · 23 · 116310.1016/0001-6160(75)90034-6 ↗