journal article·2010-11

Physical and numerical characterization of the near-eutectic permeability of aluminum–copper alloys

Ehsan Khajeh, Daan M. Maijer

Acta Materialia· Volume 58· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The near-eutectic permeability of aluminum–copper alloys has been determined through physical and numerical modeling. The physical models are large-scale analogues of interdendritic structures produced by a rapid prototyping technique from three-dimensional (3-D) geometries obtained by X-ray microtomography. A glycerin-based solution was passed through the physical models and the permeability was calculated from measurements of the discharge flow rate and pressure drop. Mathematical models, considering the continuity and momentum equations, were developed for the corresponding unstructured meshes of the 3-D geometries used for the physical models. The numerically determined values of permeability are in good agreement with those measured. With the aid of this 3-D characterization, it is possible to distinguish between isolated liquid regions that are prevalent at high solid fractions and those liquid channels that contribute to interdendritic flow. The work presented in this study highlights the attention that must be paid to numerical calculations of fluid flow in the mushy zone and presents an alternative technique to determine permeability compared to conventional permeameters.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Flemings · 1974
2. Kubo · Metall Mater Trans · 1985 · 16B · 35910.1007/BF02679728 ↗
3. Heinrich JC, Poirier DR, Mecanique CR. 2004;332:429–45.10.1016/j.crme.2004.02.001 ↗
4. Carman · 1956
5. Sabu · Metall Mater Trans · 2002 · 33B · 24310.1007/s11663-002-0009-2 ↗
6. Pequet · Metall Mater Trans · 2002 · 33A · 209510.1007/s11661-002-0041-5 ↗
7. Zhu · Metall Mater Trans · 2006 · 37A · 107510.1007/s11661-006-0080-4 ↗
8. Lee · J Light Metal · 2001 · 1 · 1510.1016/S1471-5317(00)00003-1 ↗
9. Piwonka · Trans Metall Soc AIME · 1966 · 236 · 1157
10. Apelian · Metall Trans B · 1974 · 253310.1007/BF02643874 ↗
11. Streat · Metall Trans · 1976 · 7B · 41710.1007/BF02652713 ↗
12. Murakami · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 141710.1016/0001-6160(83)90011-1 ↗
13. Murakami · Acta Metall · 1984 · 32 · 142310.1016/0001-6160(84)90088-9 ↗
14. Poirier · Mater Sci Eng A · 1992 · 157 · 11310.1016/0921-5093(92)90105-A ↗
15. Poirier · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 171 · 23110.1016/0921-5093(93)90410-G ↗
16. Duncan · Metall Mater Trans · 1999 · 30B · 74510.1007/s11663-999-0036-3 ↗
17. Han · Metall Mater Trans · 2003 · 34B · 2510.1007/s11663-003-0051-8 ↗
18. Nielsen · Metall Mater Trans · 1999 · 30A · 245510.1007/s11661-999-0254-y ↗
19. Nielsen · Metall Mater Trans · 2000 · 31A · 314910.1007/s11661-000-0094-2 ↗
20. Despois · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 138110.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.031 ↗
21. James JD, Brown SGR, Spittle JA, Lavery NP. Modeling of casting. Welding and solidification processes – XI. Opio, France: TMS (The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society); 2006. p. 1189–96.
22. Khajeh · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 475 · 35510.1016/j.msea.2007.04.076 ↗
23. Ganesan · Mater Sci Eng A · 1992 · 151 · 9710.1016/0921-5093(92)90186-5 ↗
24. Bhat · Metall Mater Trans · 1995 · 26B · 104910.1007/BF02654107 ↗
25. Brown · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 155910.1016/S1359-6454(02)00014-9 ↗
26. Bernard · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 392 · 11210.1016/j.msea.2004.09.004 ↗
27. Spittle · Mater Sci Technol · 2005 · 21 · 107110.1179/174328405X51839 ↗
28. Khajeh E, Maijer DM. Mater Sci Technol 2009. doi:10.1179/174328409X411718.10.1179/174328409X411718 ↗
29. Salvo · Nucl Inst Method Phys Res · 2003 · 200B · 27310.1016/S0168-583X(02)01689-0 ↗
30. ANSYS ICEM CFD 11.0 documentation.