journal article·2011-10

Defects and transport processes in beryllium

S.C. Middleburgh, R.W. Grimes

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Intrinsic and substitutional defect formation and migration energies for beryllium metal have been predicted via atomic scale computer simulation and are discussed with respect to equilibrium and radiation damage processes. Schottky disorder was found to be the dominant intrinsic defect process, but its high energy implies only a small concentration of beryllium vacancies in the lattice. The anti-Schottky energy, being higher, implies that the intrinsic interstitial concentration will be still orders of magnitude lower. The energy barriers for migration of Be vacancies and interstitials are similar, at 0.72 and 0.64 eV respectively; both are essentially isotropic processes. Extrinsic defect properties have been calculated for hydrogen, helium, oxygen, iron, aluminium, carbon, magnesium and silicon. For example, helium has a large positive solution energy but preferentially occupies a beryllium vacancy site. Conversely, oxygen has a negative solution energy and is most stable as an interstitial species. Iron has a small negative solution energy, while aluminium and magnesium have high positive solution energies. The key intermetallics FeBe 5 and FeAlBe 4 have also been investigated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Nuclear Materials and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Kawamura · Fusion Eng Des · 2002 · 61 · 39110.1016/S0920-3796(02)00106-0 ↗
2. Walsh KA. Beryllium chemistry and processing. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 2009.
3. Allouche · J Phys Chem C · 2010 · 114 · 358810.1021/jp910806j ↗
4. Krimmel · J Nucl Mater · 1998 · 255 · 7210.1016/S0022-3115(98)00025-7 ↗
5. Krimmel · J Nucl Mater · 1996 · 231 · 15910.1016/0022-3115(96)00371-6 ↗
6. de Bas · J Phys Chem Solids · 2003 · 64 · 49510.1016/S0022-3697(02)00356-6 ↗
7. Rooksby · J Nucl Mater · 1962 · 7 · 20510.1016/0022-3115(62)90166-6 ↗
8. Dombrowski · Fusion Eng Des · 1997 · 37 · 22910.1016/S0920-3796(97)00048-3 ↗
9. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
10. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
11. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
12. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 113 · 990110.1063/1.1329672 ↗
13. Mackay · J Nucl Mater · 1963 · 8 · 26310.1016/0022-3115(63)90043-6 ↗
14. Carrabine · J Nucl Mater · 1962 · 8 · 27810.1016/0022-3115(63)90049-7 ↗
15. Levy · Physica B · 2005 · 365 · 14710.1016/j.physb.2005.05.008 ↗
16. Okamoto · J Phase Equilib · 1987 · 8 · 39210.1007/BF02893155 ↗
17. Carter · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 288510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00087-2 ↗
18. Cao · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 64710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.022 ↗
19. Reed · Anal Chim Acta · 1954 · 10 · 42910.1016/S0003-2670(00)89684-1 ↗
20. Aymar · Plasma Phys Control Fusion · 2002 · 44 · 51910.1088/0741-3335/44/5/304 ↗
21. Tzeng · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 683710.1103/PhysRevB.58.6837 ↗
22. Baker · Acta Crystallogr · 1962 · 15 · 17510.1107/S0365110X62000468 ↗
23. Fridlyander · Metalloved Term Obrab Met · 1970 · 7 · 50
24. Okamoto · J Phase Equilib Diffus · 2009 · 30 · 11510.1007/s11669-008-9433-6 ↗
25. Okamoto · J Phase Equilib Diffus · 2006 · 27 · 42410.1007/s11669-006-0025-z ↗
26. Tanner · J Phase Equilib · 1980 · 9 · 494
27. Okamoto H, Tanner LE. In: Alloy phase diagrams. ASM Handbook, vol. 3. Materials Park (OH): ASM International; 1992.
28. Huber · 1979
29. Harrison · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 045433-110.1103/PhysRevB.81.045433 ↗