Influence of mosaicity on the fracture behavior of sapphire
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The resistance to breakage of sapphire samples of different crystallographic orientations and produced by the Kyropoulos and Verneuil processes was investigated. The fracture strength was determined by using four-point bending tests, whereas the single-edge V-notch beam method was used to measure the fracture toughness. For both mechanical properties, it was found that (i) Verneuil sapphire has values up to two times higher than Kyropoulos sapphire and (ii) the data scatter is also generally higher for Verneuil sapphire. The main factor responsible for this behavior is believed to be the presence of mosaicity in Verneuil and its absence in Kyropoulos sapphire. By using the Read–Shockley model to estimate the energy of low-angle grain boundaries, together with the Griffith energy criterion for intergranular crack propagation, it is demonstrated that intergranular fracture along the mosaic block boundaries is energetically more favorable than transgranular fracture for crack-to-boundary orientations smaller than a critical deflection angle. Nevertheless, both the location of the crack in respect to the boundary, as well as the 3-D nature of these features, must be taken into consideration for a complete description of the intergranular deflection toughening mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Dobrovinskaya · 2009
2. Lawn · 1993
3. Rinaudo · Mater Chem Phys · 2000 · 66 · 14310.1016/S0254-0584(00)00340-0 ↗
4. Rinaudo · J Appl Crystallogr · 2000 · 33 · 94710.1107/S0021889800004118 ↗
5. Ivanov · Crystallogr Rep · 2005 · 50 · S2210.1134/1.2133967 ↗
6. DIN. DIN EN 843–1—Advanced technical ceramics—Mechanical properties of monolithic ceramics at room temperature—Part 1: Determination of flexural strength; German version EN 843–1:2006. Berlin: Beuth; 2008.
7. CEN. CEN/TS 14425–5—Advanced technical ceramics—Test methods for determination of fracture toughness of monolitic ceramics—Part 5: Single-edge vee-notch beam (SEVNB) method. London: BSI; 2004.
8. Weibull W. A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Paper presented at the Ingeniors Vetenskapes Akademien Handlingar, Stockholm; 1939. p. 55.
9. Weibull · J Appl Mech · 1951 · 18 · 29310.1115/1.4010337 ↗
10. 2000
11. ASTM. ASTM E 1876–99—Standard test method for dynamic Young’s Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson’s Ratio by Impulse Excitation of Vibration; 2009.
12. Therese · Anal Bioanal Chem · 2006 · 386 · 16310.1007/s00216-006-0503-5 ↗
13. Doolittle · Nucl Instrum Meth B · 1986 · 15 · 22710.1016/0168-583X(86)90291-0 ↗
14. Dwikusuma · J Electrochem Soc · 2002 · 149 · G60310.1149/1.1509072 ↗
15. Marasina · Cryst Res Technol · 1982 · 17 · 36510.1002/crat.2170170320 ↗
16. Hioki · J Mater Sci Lett · 1984 · 3 · 109910.1007/BF00719777 ↗
17. Mchargue · Mater Sci Eng, A · 1989 · 115 · 36110.1016/0921-5093(89)90704-1 ↗
18. Khattak · Proc SPIE · 2003 · 5078 · 4710.1117/12.487633 ↗
19. Porto · J Chem Phys · 1967 · 47 · 100910.1063/1.1711980 ↗
20. Munisso · Phys Status Solidi (b) · 2009 · 246 · 189310.1002/pssb.200945137 ↗
21. Watson · J Appl Phys · 1981 · 52 · 95610.1063/1.328785 ↗
22. Jia · J Raman Spectrosc · 1989 · 20 · 78510.1002/jrs.1250201206 ↗
23. Gallas · J Mater Res · 1995 · 10 · 281710.1557/JMR.1995.2817 ↗
24. Wermelinger · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 465710.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.036 ↗
25. Wiederhorn · J Am Ceram Soc · 1969 · 52 · 48510.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb09199.x ↗
26. Data obtained from the supplier; 2009.
27. Otte · Phys Status Solidi · 1966 · 16 · K2510.1002/pssb.19660160142 ↗
28. AddaBedia · Phys Rev E · 1996 · 54 · 577410.1103/PhysRevE.54.5774 ↗
29. Sharon · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 76 · 211710.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2117 ↗
30. Buehler · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 30710.1038/nature04408 ↗
31. Yoffe · Philos Mag · 1951 · 42 · 73910.1080/14786445108561302 ↗
32. Gao · J Mech Phys Solids · 1993 · 41 · 45710.1016/0022-5096(93)90044-G ↗
33. Abraham · J Mech Phys Solids · 2001 · 49 · 209510.1016/S0022-5096(01)00028-X ↗
34. Abraham · J Mech Phys Solids · 2005 · 53 · 107110.1016/j.jmps.2004.12.005 ↗
35. Vodenitcharova · J Mater Process Tech · 2007 · 194 · 5210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.125 ↗
36. Belaya · Phys Chem Mater Treat · 1984 · 8 · 128
37. Read · Phys Rev · 1950 · 78 · 27510.1103/PhysRev.78.275 ↗
38. Smallman · 1999
39. Heuer · Philos Mag A · 1998 · 78 · 74710.1080/01418619808241934 ↗
40. Swanson · J Am Ceram Soc · 1987 · 70 · 27910.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04982.x ↗
41. Wang · J Eng Mech · 1995 · 121 · 121810.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1995)121:11(1218) ↗
42. Schmid · J Am Ceram Soc · 1998 · 81 · 88510.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02423.x ↗
43. Gurjiyants · J Cryst Growth · 1999 · 198 · 22710.1016/S0022-0248(98)01131-2 ↗
44. How edge finish affects the strength of sapphire
45. Klein · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 96 · 317210.1063/1.1782272 ↗
46. Iwasa · Adv Ceram · 1984 · 10 · 767
47. Wunderlich · Mater Design · 2001 · 22 · 5310.1016/S0261-3069(00)00044-3 ↗