journal article·2011-04

Repulsive force vs. source number: Competing mechanisms in the yield of twinned gold nanowires of finite length

Xu Guo, Yuzhi Xia

Acta Materialia· Volume 59· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoscale twin boundaries play a significant role in the yield behavior of nanowires. They serve as both a source of dislocation nucleation and a generator of the repulsive force which acts against the nucleation of dislocations. In the present paper molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are performed to investigate the tensile deformation of twinned gold nanowires (NWs) of finite length. Emphasis is placed on competing mechanisms in the initial yield of nanowires: dislocation source number vs. repulsive force, both of which are controlled by the twin boundary spacing. The simulation results reveal that with decreasing twin boundary spacing there is a transition from softening to strengthening due to a change in the dominant mechanism of plastic deformation. An analytical model based on kinetic rate theory is also established to provide an insight into the competing mechanisms indicated by the simulation results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Surface and Thin Film Phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
2. Wu · Nature · 2004 · 430 · 6110.1038/nature02674 ↗
3. Wu · Nat Mater · 2005 · 4 · 52510.1038/nmat1403 ↗
4. Jang · Nat Mater · 2010 · 9 · 21510.1038/nmat2622 ↗
5. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
6. Diao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 64310.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.008 ↗
7. Cao · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 15190910.1063/1.2721367 ↗
8. Shan · Nat Mater · 2007 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
9. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 02550210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.025502 ↗
10. Tian · Nano Lett · 2003 · 3 · 91910.1021/nl034217d ↗
11. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
12. Zhu · Proc Natl Acad Sci · 2007 · 104 · 303110.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
13. Jin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 112610.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.020 ↗
14. Zheng · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 50810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.039 ↗
15. Kulkarni · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 483510.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.047 ↗
16. Lu · Science · 2009 · 323 · 60710.1126/science.1167641 ↗
17. Zhang · Nanoscale Res Lett · 2009 · 4 · 3410.1007/s11671-008-9198-1 ↗
18. Deng · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 151710.1021/nl803553b ↗
19. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
20. Cordill · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 451510.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.037 ↗
21. Li · MRS Bull · 2007 · 32 · 15110.1557/mrs2007.48 ↗
22. Deng · ACS Nano · 2009 · 3 · 300110.1021/nn900668p ↗
23. Hyde · JOM · 2005 · 57 · 6210.1007/s11837-005-0118-x ↗
24. Afanasyev · Nano Lett · 2007 · 7 · 205610.1021/nl070959l ↗
25. Deng · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 95 · 09191410.1063/1.3222936 ↗
26. Ngan · Proc Roy Soc A · 2006 · 462 · 166110.1098/rspa.2005.1645 ↗
27. Li · Nature · 2010 · 464 · 87710.1038/nature08929 ↗
28. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 04190610.1063/1.2965637 ↗
29. Grochola · J Chem Phys · 2005 · 123 · 20471910.1063/1.2124667 ↗
30. Plimpton · J Comp Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
31. Hoover · Phys Rev A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
32. Cheung · J Appl Phys · 1991 · 70 · 568810.1063/1.350186 ↗
33. Faken · Compos Mater Sci · 1994 · 2 · 27910.1016/0927-0256(94)90109-0 ↗
34. Li · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
35. Diao · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 193510.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.009 ↗
36. Deng · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 609010.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.035 ↗
37. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 75 · 21210410.1103/PhysRevB.75.212104 ↗
38. Zuo · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 94 · 09550110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.095501 ↗
39. Gall · Nano Lett · 2004 · 4 · 243110.1021/nl048456s ↗
40. Kocks · Prog Mater Sci · 1975 · 19 · 303
41. Hirel · Phys Rev B · 2008 · 78 · 06410910.1103/PhysRevB.78.064109 ↗
42. Hirel · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 05990110.1103/PhysRevB.81.059901 ↗
43. Hirth · 1982
44. Deng · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 5010.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.03.005 ↗
45. Gao · J Mech Phys Solids · 1989 · 37 · 15510.1016/0022-5096(89)90008-2 ↗
46. Asaro · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 336910.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗
47. Beltz · Phys Status Solidi (b) · 1993 · 180 · 30310.1002/pssb.2221800203 ↗
48. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
49. Gavazza · J Mech Phys Solids · 1976 · 24 · 17110.1016/0022-5096(76)90001-6 ↗