Composition-dependent ground state of martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract For Ni–Mn–Ga alloys, giant magnetic-field-induced strains may be achieved in a modulated martensitic state, offering attractive chances for academic and practical exploration. However, the metastability of modulated martensite imposes a severe constraint on the capacity of these alloys as promising materials for sensors and actuators. In the present work, we conduct both experimental examinations and ab initio calculations to seek potential remedies of this critical problem through composition tuning. Results show that, for Group II alloys having modulated martensite at reasonable temperatures, the increase in Ni addition results in an enhanced tendency to the formation of non-modulated (NM) martensite, whereas the proper Mn addition leads to the stabilization of seven-layered modulated (7M) martensite, which serves as the structural ground state of martensite. By correlating the microstructural evolutions with the two-stage phase transformation (i.e. austenite → 7M martensite → NM martensite), it is demonstrated that the 7M martensite possesses lower energy barriers in terms of the lattice distortion of parent austenite and the interfacial energy of martensitic variants, which plays a vital role in bridging the austenite to NM martensite transformation. This result is expected to provide useful information for the design of these new functional materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Dunand · Adv Mater · 2011 · 23 · 21610.1002/adma.201002753 ↗
2. Kainuma · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 95710.1038/nature04493 ↗
3. Karaca · Adv Funct Mater · 2009 · 19 · 98310.1002/adfm.200801322 ↗
4. Ma · Adv Funct Mater · 2012 · 22 · 252910.1002/adfm.201103021 ↗
5. Murray · Appl Phys Lett · 2000 · 77 · 88610.1063/1.1306635 ↗
6. Sozinov · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 80 · 174610.1063/1.1458075 ↗
7. Müllner · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 153110.1063/1.1639144 ↗
8. Chmielus · Nat Mater · 2009 · 8 · 86310.1038/nmat2527 ↗
9. O’Handley · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 83 · 326310.1063/1.367094 ↗
10. Pons · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 302710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00130-0 ↗
11. Richard · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 179710.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.033 ↗
12. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 277910.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.024 ↗
13. Chernenko · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 40 · 52310.1016/S1359-6462(98)00494-1 ↗
14. Sozinov · IEEE Trans Magn · 2002 · 38 · 281410.1109/TMAG.2002.803567 ↗
15. Chernenko · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 5310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00320-2 ↗
16. Lanska · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 807410.1063/1.1748860 ↗
17. Chernenko · Scripta Metall Mater · 1995 · 33 · 123910.1016/0956-716X(95)00370-B ↗
18. Jiang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 342 · 23110.1016/S0921-5093(02)00288-5 ↗
19. Seguí · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 11110.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.008 ↗
20. Chernenko · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 57 · 265910.1103/PhysRevB.57.2659 ↗
21. Chernenko · J Magn Magn Mater · 2005 · 290–291 · 87110.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.399 ↗
22. Straka · IEEE Trans Magn · 2002 · 38 · 283510.1109/TMAG.2002.802469 ↗
23. Martynov · J Phys IV · 1995 · 5 · C8
24. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
25. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
26. Vanderbilt · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 789210.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
27. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
28. Righi · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 452910.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.010 ↗
29. Li · J Appl Cryst · 2010 · 43 · 61710.1107/S002188981000868X ↗
30. Xu · Appl Phys Lett · 2012 · 100 · 08410610.1063/1.3690054 ↗
31. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
32. Enkovaara · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 378 · 5210.1016/j.msea.2003.10.330 ↗
33. Chernenko · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 507110.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.018 ↗
34. Raulot · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 71 · 03520310.1103/PhysRevB.71.035203 ↗
35. Entel · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 2006 · 39 · 86510.1088/0022-3727/39/5/S13 ↗
36. Siewert · Adv Eng Mater · 2012 · 14 · 53010.1002/adem.201200063 ↗
37. Uijttewaal · Phys Rev Lett · 2009 · 102 · 03570210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.035702 ↗
38. Li · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 698210.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.001 ↗
39. Pons · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 08351610.1063/1.1861137 ↗
40. Pons · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 438–440 · 93110.1016/j.msea.2006.02.179 ↗
41. Seguí · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 164910.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.025 ↗
42. Li · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 339010.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.014 ↗
43. Zhang · J Appl Cryst · 2007 · 40 · 43610.1107/S0021889807014331 ↗
44. Zhang · J Appl Cryst · 2010 · 43 · 142610.1107/S0021889810037180 ↗
45. Khachaturyan · Phys Rev B · 1991 · 43 · 1083210.1103/PhysRevB.43.10832 ↗