Are Langmuir Trough Studies Useful? Unexpected Emulsification Behavior Using Colloidal Rods
Source abstract
Abstract
While studies carried out in a Langmuir trough have rigorously demonstrated that, at high surface pressure, ellipsoidal particles do flip and spherocylinders (rods) can flip, much less is known about the practical situation on the surface of a droplet or bubble. We present emulsification studies using colloidal rods and find that the droplets are bridged by the rods independent of shear rate and particle concentration and are only weakly dependent on the pH of the continuous phase. In a trough, it is the low aspect ratio rods which flip and the high aspect ratio rods which form bilayers; on the surface of a droplet we found that the high aspect ratio rods always bridge whereas the shorter rods show random bridging behavior. Hence, the behavior of anisotropic particles "in action" is essentially opposite to expectations from trough studies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Proteins in Food Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Peter Guthrie Tait Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, U.K.
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.170518111410.1073/pnas.1705181114 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms1430510.1038/ncomms14305 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0202610.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02026 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.01800110.1103/PhysRevLett.119.018001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.04410.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.044 ↗
6. 10.1021/la060465o10.1021/la060465o ↗
7. 10.3866/PKU.WHXB20191000510.3866/PKU.WHXB201910005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.00310.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.003 ↗
9. 10.1039/b816680c10.1039/b816680c ↗
10. 10.1021/cm301772p10.1021/cm301772p ↗
11. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.10534410.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105344 ↗
12. 10.1039/C3SM53186D10.1039/C3SM53186D ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0353410.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03534 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20050313110.1002/anie.200503131 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.03210.1016/j.jcis.2014.11.032 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.05610.1016/j.jcis.2011.07.056 ↗
17. 10.1021/la053017+10.1021/la053017+ ↗
18. 10.1039/c2sm25758k10.1039/c2sm25758k ↗
19. 10.1021/la203384f10.1021/la203384f ↗
20. 10.1039/C6SM02858F10.1039/C6SM02858F ↗
21. 10.1021/la035609310.1021/la0356093 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep3140110.1038/srep31401 ↗
23. 10.1021/la204376310.1021/la2043763 ↗
24. 10.1039/C4SM00179F10.1039/C4SM00179F ↗
25. 10.1007/s00397-006-0130-210.1007/s00397-006-0130-2 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00397-013-0752-010.1007/s00397-013-0752-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.01010.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.010 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6SM02432G10.1039/C6SM02432G ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0386310.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03863 ↗
30. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/49/49422310.1088/0953-8984/20/49/494223 ↗
31. 10.1021/la046915z10.1021/la046915z ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b0077510.1021/acs.langmuir.5b00775 ↗
33. 10.1021/la063593l10.1021/la063593l ↗