Influence of Interlayer Exchanges on Vorticity-Aligned Colloidal String Assembly in a Simple Shear Flow
Source abstract
Abstract
Hard spheres in Newtonian fluids serve as paradigms for non-Newtonian materials phenomena exhibited by colloidal suspensions. A recent experimental study (Cheng et al. Science 2011, 333, 1276) showed that upon application of shear to such a system the particles form string-like structures aligned in the vorticity direction. We explore the mechanism underlying this out-of-equilibrium organization with steered transition path sampling, which allows us to bias the Brownian contribution to rotations of close pairs of particles and alter the dynamics of the suspension in a controlled fashion. Our results show a strong correlation between the string structures and the rotation dynamics. Specifically, the simulations show that accelerating the rotations of close pairs of particles, not increasing their frequency, favors the formation of the strings. This insight delineates the roles of hydrodynamics, Brownian motion, and particle packing, and, in turn, informs design strategies for controlling the assembly of large-scale particle structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Micro and Nano Robotics · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
Pillar of Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, 20 Dover Drive, 138682 Singapore
James Franck Institute and Department of Chemistry, University of Chicago, 929 East 57th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen D. T. N. · Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. · 2010 · 1 · 30110.1146/annurev-conmatphys-070909-104120 ↗
2. Mewis J. · 2012
3. Lin T. · Soft Matter · 2013 · 9 · 517310.1039/c3sm50619c ↗
4. Masliyah J. H. · 200610.1002/0471799742 ↗
5. Comiskey B. · Nature · 1998 · 394 · 25310.1038/28349 ↗
6. Hiemenz P. C. · 1997
7. Brown E. · Science · 2011 · 333 · 123010.1126/science.1211155 ↗
8. Kulkarni S. D. · J. Rheol. · 2009 · 53 · 41710.1122/1.3073754 ↗
9. Cohen I. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 04600110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.046001 ↗
10. Chen H. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 133310.1038/ncomms2326 ↗
11. Xu X. L. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2013 · 110 · 377110.1073/pnas.1301055110 ↗
12. Wu Y. L. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2009 · 106 · 1056410.1073/pnas.0812519106 ↗
13. Besseling T. H. · Soft Matter · 2012 · 8 · 693110.1039/c2sm07156h ↗
14. Chen Q. · Nature · 2011 · 469 · 38110.1038/nature09713 ↗
15. Glotzer S. C. · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 55710.1038/nmat1949 ↗
16. Vermant J. · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · R187
17. Cheng X. · Science · 2011 · 333 · 127610.1126/science.1207032 ↗
18. Cheng X. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2012 · 109 · 6310.1073/pnas.1118197108 ↗
19. Guttenberg N. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 136 · 23410310.1063/1.4724301 ↗
20. Ermak D. L. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1978 · 69 · 135210.1063/1.436761 ↗
21. Bossis G. · J. Chem. Phys. · 1989 · 91 · 186610.1063/1.457091 ↗
22. Phung T. N. · J. Fluid Mech. · 1996 · 313 · 18110.1017/S0022112096002170 ↗
23. Semwogerere D. · Phys. Fluids · 2008 · 20 · 04330610.1063/1.2907378 ↗
24. Brady J. F. · J. Fluid Mech. · 1997 · 348 · 10310.1017/S0022112097006320 ↗
25. Foss D. R. · J. Fluid Mech. · 2000 · 407 · 16710.1017/S0022112099007557 ↗