journal article·2023-08-03Open access

An Efficient Reactive Force Field without Explicit Coordination Dependence for Studying Caustic Aluminum Chemistry

Maxime Pouvreau, Qing Guo, Hsiu-Wen Wang, Gregory K. Schenter, Carolyn I. Pearce, Aurora E. Clark, Kevin M. Rosso

Abstract

Reactive force fields (RFFs) are an expedient approach to sample chemical reaction paths in complex systems, relative to density functional theory. However, there is continued need to improve efficiencies, specifically in systems that have slow transverse degrees of freedom, as in highly viscous and superconcentrated solutions. Here, we present an RFF that is differentiated from current models (e.g., ReaxFF) by omitting explicit dependence on the atom coordination and employing a small parameter set based on Lennard-Jones, Gaussian, and Stillinger–Weber potentials. The model was parametrized from AIMD simulation data and is used to model aluminate reactivity in sodium hydroxide solutions with extensive validation against experimental radial distribution functions, computed free energy profiles for oligomerization, and formation energies. The model enables simulation of early stage Al(OH) 3 nucleation which has significant relevance to industrial processing of aluminum and has a computational cost that is reduced by 1 order of magnitude relative to ReaxFF.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Coagulation and Flocculation Studies · Crystallization and Solubility Studies · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States

Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jp004368u10.1021/jp004368u ↗
2. 10.1021/jp709896w10.1021/jp709896w ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.12532810.1103/PhysRevB.81.125328 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mser.2013.07.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.07.001 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.699110.1103/PhysRevB.37.6991 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.945810.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/31210.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja00275a01310.1021/ja00275a013 ↗
9. 10.1021/j100161a07010.1021/j100161a070 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b0148110.1021/acs.jpca.9b01481 ↗
11. 10.1039/C7CP06191A10.1039/C7CP06191A ↗
12. 10.1039/C8CP04957B10.1039/C8CP04957B ↗
13. 10.1021/jp072530o10.1021/jp072530o ↗
14. 10.1021/jp076936c10.1021/jp076936c ↗
15. 10.1002/jcc.1013010.1002/jcc.10130 ↗
16. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0254810.1021/acs.jpcb.7b02548 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.213687710.1063/1.2136877 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.355878710.1063/1.3558787 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.243116910.1063/1.2431169 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.31.526210.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0010-4655(97)00041-610.1016/S0010-4655(97)00041-6 ↗
23. Hockney R. W. · 198810.1887/0852743920 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0259207010.1007/BF02592070 ↗
26. Gablonsky J. M.
27. Johnson S. G. · 2021
28. 10.1039/C8CP06802J10.1039/C8CP06802J ↗
29. 10.1021/ct100371910.1021/ct1003719 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c0266010.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c02660 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.477358110.1063/1.4773581 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x ↗
33. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00894-007-0233-410.1007/s00894-007-0233-4 ↗