Modeling Gas Flow Dynamics in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Source abstract
Abstract
Modeling fluid flow dynamics in metal organic frameworks (MOFs) is a required step toward understanding mechanisms of their activity as novel catalysts, sensors, and filtration materials. We adapted a lattice Boltzmann model, previously used for studying flow dynamics in meso- and microporous media, to the nanoscale dimensions of the MOF pores. Using this model, rapid screening of permeability of a large number of MOF structures, in different crystallographic directions, is possible. The method was illustrated here on the example of an anisotropic MOF, for which we calculated permeability values in different flow directions. This method can be generalized to a large class of MOFs and used to design MOFs with the desired gas flow permeabilities.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794 United States
Division of Chemistry, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973 United States
Funding
U. S. Army Research Laboratory and the U. S. Army Research Office
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C7CS90049J10.1039/C7CS90049J ↗
2. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.03.03410.1016/j.micromeso.2004.03.034 ↗
3. 10.1021/cr200304e10.1021/cr200304e ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.00810.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.008 ↗
5. 10.1021/cr200314710.1021/cr2003147 ↗
6. 10.1021/cr200324t10.1021/cr200324t ↗
7. 10.1039/C7CS00122C10.1039/C7CS00122C ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.00410.1016/j.ccr.2016.11.004 ↗
9. 10.1126/science.125422710.1126/science.1254227 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms1131510.1038/ncomms11315 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.123044410.1126/science.1230444 ↗
12. 10.1021/cr200190s10.1021/cr200190s ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.00510.1016/j.ccr.2017.09.005 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.20150209410.1002/anie.201502094 ↗
15. 10.1038/nmat423810.1038/nmat4238 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20150215510.1002/anie.201502155 ↗
17. 10.1021/ie300766s10.1021/ie300766s ↗
18. 10.1021/ja039215+10.1021/ja039215+ ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms1263410.1038/ncomms12634 ↗
20. 10.1021/ja405082810.1021/ja4050828 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja408959g10.1021/ja408959g ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0897110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08971 ↗
23. 10.1154/1.213531510.1154/1.2135315 ↗
24. Thorne D. T. · 2006
25. 10.1007/BF0061692310.1007/BF00616923 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.74310.1103/PhysRevE.53.743 ↗
27. 10.1038/srep3239310.1038/srep32393 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRev.94.51110.1103/PhysRev.94.511 ↗
29. 10.1021/j100785a00110.1021/j100785a001 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0103652310.1007/BF01036523 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.6b0744510.1021/jacs.6b07445 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0135110.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01351 ↗