journal article·2012-04-19

Nucleotide Dynamics at the A-Site Cleft in the Peptidyltransferase Center of H. marismortui 50S Ribosomal Subunits

Yuhang Wang, Jana K. Shen, Susan J. Schroeder

Publisher page

Abstract

Resistance mutations to antibiotics targeting rRNA can be far from the drug-binding site. Crystallography studies revealed that the antibiotic resistance mutation G2482A (G2447A in E. coli ) in Haloarcula marismortui 50S ribosomes does not directly contact the drug or introduce changes to the ribosomal structure except for losing a potassium ion coordinated to a base triple at the drug-binding site. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we tested hypotheses regarding the effects of the G2482A mutation and ion coordination on the conformational dynamics of the 50S ribosome. Simulations show that the mutation enhances conformational fluctuation at the antibiotic binding site, weakens the hydrogen-bonding network, and increases flexibility at the 50S peptidyl transferase center (PTC). Our data supports the view that distant mutations can perturb the dynamic network in the ribosomal PTC, thereby raising the entropic cost of antibiotic binding. These results underscore the importance of considering conformational dynamics in rational drug design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms · RNA modifications and cancer · Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, ‡School of Chemical, Biological, and Materials Engineering, and ξDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, United States

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Guttell, R. R.Comparative RNA Website and Project.http://www.rna.icmb.utexas.edu (2011) .
2. Davidovich C. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2008 · 105 · 2066510.1073/pnas.0810826105 ↗
3. Schlunzen F. · Nature · 2001 · 413 · 81410.1038/35101544 ↗
4. Gurel G. · J. Mol. Biol. · 2009 · 389 · 14610.1016/j.jmb.2009.04.005 ↗
5. Blaha G. · J. Mol. Biol. · 2008 · 379 · 50510.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.075 ↗
6. Hansen J. L. · J. Mol. Biol. · 2003 · 330 · 106110.1016/S0022-2836(03)00668-5 ↗
7. Bulkley D. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2010 · 107 · 1715810.1073/pnas.1008685107 ↗
8. Dunkle J. A. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2010 · 107 · 1715210.1073/pnas.1007988107 ↗
9. Wilson D. N. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2008 · 105 · 1333910.1073/pnas.0804276105 ↗
10. Ippolito J. A. · J. Med. Chem. · 2008 · 51 · 335310.1021/jm800379d ↗
11. Thompson J. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2001 · 98 · 900210.1073/pnas.151257098 ↗
12. Ban N. · Science · 2000 · 289 · 90510.1126/science.289.5481.905 ↗
13. Nissen P. · Science · 2000 · 289 · 92010.1126/science.289.5481.920 ↗
14. Klinge S. · Science · 2011 · 334 · 94110.1126/science.1211204 ↗
15. Eisenmesser E. Z. · Nature · 2005 · 438 · 11710.1038/nature04105 ↗
16. Benkovic S. J. · Biochemistry · 2008 · 47 · 331710.1021/bi800049z ↗
17. Manson A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2009 · 131 · 678510.1021/ja809133u ↗
18. Lukman S. · PLoS Comput. Biol. · 2010 · 6
19. Schmeing T. M. · Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. · 2011 · 18 · 43210.1038/nsmb.2003 ↗
20. Rakauskaite R. · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2008 · 36 · 149710.1093/nar/gkm1179 ↗
21. Meskauskas A. · Nucleic Acids Res. · 2010 · 38 · 780010.1093/nar/gkq641 ↗
22. Hess B. · J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2008 · 4 · 43510.1021/ct700301q ↗
23. Wang J. · J. Comput. Chem. · 2000 · 21 · 104910.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12<1049::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
24. Dang L. X. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 695410.1021/ja00131a018 ↗
25. Whitford P. C. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 1317010.1021/ja1061399 ↗
26. Grant R. · Bioinformatics · 2006 · 22 · 269510.1093/bioinformatics/btl461 ↗