Solid–solid transformations via nanoscale intermediate interfacial phase: Multiple structures, scale and mechanics effects
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Solid–solid ( SS ) phase transformations via nanometer-size intermediate melts ( IMs ) within the SS interface, hundreds of degrees below melting temperature, were predicted thermodynamically and are consistent with experiments for various materials. A necessary condition for the appearance of IMs, using a sharp interface approach, was that the ratio of the energies of SS and solid–melt ( SM ) interfaces, k E , were >2. Here, an advanced phase-field approach coupled with mechanics is developed that reveals various new scale and interaction effects and phenomena. Various types of IM are found: (i) continuous and reversible premelting and melting; (ii) jump-like barrierless transformation to IMs, which can be kept at much lower temperature even for k E 2 ; (iii) unstable IMs, i.e. a critical nucleus between the SS interface and the IM. A surprising scale effect related to the ratio of widths of SS and SM interfaces is found: it suppresses barrierless IMs but allows IMs to be kept at much lower temperatures even for k E 2 . Relaxation of elastic stresses strongly promotes IMs, which can appear even at k E 2 and be retained at k E = 1 . The theory developed here can be tailored for diffusive phase transformations, formation of intergranular and interfacial phases, and surface-induced phase transformations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Levitas · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 92 · 23570210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.235702 ↗
2. Levitas · J Phys Chem B · 2006 · 110 · 1010510.1021/jp057438b ↗
3. Levitas · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 07570110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.075701 ↗
4. Levitas · Phys Rev B · 2012 · 85 · 22010410.1103/PhysRevB.85.220104 ↗
5. Randzio · J Phys Chem B · 2008 · 112 · 143510.1021/jp077161a ↗
6. Grinfeld · 1991
7. Lobkovsky · Physica D · 2002 · 164 · 20210.1016/S0167-2789(02)00377-9 ↗
8. Tang · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 02410210.1103/PhysRevB.73.024102 ↗
9. Bishop · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 475510.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.008 ↗
10. Levitas · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 14010310.1103/PhysRevB.84.140103 ↗
11. Levitas · Nat Commun · 2011 · 2 · 28410.1038/ncomms1275 ↗
12. Levitas · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 105 · 16570110.1103/PhysRevLett.105.165701 ↗
13. Levitas · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 107 · 17570110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.175701 ↗
14. Lipowsky · Phys Rev Lett · 1982 · 49 · 157510.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1575 ↗
15. Tiaden · Physica D · 1998 · 115 · 7310.1016/S0167-2789(97)00226-1 ↗
16. Levitas · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 13420110.1103/PhysRevB.68.134201 ↗
17. Wang · J Am Ceram Soc · 1998 · 81 · 8910.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02299.x ↗
18. Luo · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87 · 23190210.1063/1.2138796 ↗
19. Avishai · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 155910.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.009 ↗
20. Luo · Crit Rev Solid State · 2007 · 32 · 6710.1080/10408430701364388 ↗
21. Luo · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 22710.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.132431 ↗
22. Luo · J Am Ceram Soc · 2012 · 95 · 235810.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.05059.x ↗
23. Cahn · J Chem Phys · 1977 · 66 · 366710.1063/1.434402 ↗
24. Baram · Science · 2011 · 332 · 20610.1126/science.1201596 ↗
25. Luo · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 450110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00237-8 ↗
26. Avishai · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 157110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.008 ↗
27. Cantwell · Acta Mater · 2013
28. Qian · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 86210.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.049 ↗
29. Chung · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 234510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00042-9 ↗
30. Levitas · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 430510.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.034 ↗
31. Levitas · Phys Rev B · 2013 · 88 · 05411310.1103/PhysRevB.88.054113 ↗