journal article·2026-03-19Open access

Fine-Tuning Unifies Foundational Machine-Learned Interatomic Potential Architectures at ab initio Accuracy

Jonas Hänseroth, Aaron Flötotto, Muhammad Nawaz Qaisrani, Christian Dreßler

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide This work demonstrates that fine-tuning transforms foundational machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) to achieve consistent, near- ab initio accuracy across diverse architectures. Benchmarking five leading MLIP frameworks (MACE, GRACE, SevenNet, MatterSim, and ORB) across seven chemically diverse compounds reveals that fine-tuning universally enhances force predictions by factors of 5-15 and improves energy accuracy by 2-4 orders of magnitude. The investigated models span both equivariant and invariant, as well as conservative and non-conservative, architectures. While general-purpose foundation models are robust, they exhibit architecture-dependent deviations from ab initio reference data; specialized system-specific training (fine-tuning) eliminates these discrepancies, enabling quantitatively accurate predictions of atomistic and structural properties. Using datasets constructed from 2000 equidistantly sampled frames of short ab initio molecular dynamics trajectories, fine-tuning reduces force errors by an order of magnitude and harmonizes performance across all architectures. These findings establish fine-tuning as a universal route to achieving system-specific predictive accuracy while preserving the computational efficiency of MLIPs. To promote widespread adoption, we introduce the aMACEing Toolkit, which provides a unified and reproducible interface for fine-tuning workflows across multiple MLIP frameworks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Machine Learning in Materials Science

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Theoretical Solid State Physics, Institute of Physics

Technische Universität Ilmenau

Funding

Thüringer Aufbaubank · Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung · European Social Fund Plus

References (87)

Show source-provided references
1. Marx, D.; Hutter, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics: Theory and implementation, Modern methods and algorithms of quantum chemistry ; John von Neumann Institute for Computing, 2000; Vol. 1, p 141.
2. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/50/20210.1088/0953-8984/14/50/202 ↗
3. 10.1073/pnas.050019310210.1073/pnas.0500193102 ↗
4. 10.1016/0927-0256(95)00037-110.1016/0927-0256(95)00037-1 ↗
5. Sutmann G. · 2002 · 10 · 211
6. 10.1063/5.004545510.1063/5.0045455 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.5c0955810.1021/jacs.5c09558 ↗
8. 10.1039/D4SC06530A10.1039/D4SC06530A ↗
9. 10.1007/s10462-024-10731-410.1007/s10462-024-10731-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.01610.1016/j.sbi.2019.12.016 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.13640310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41563-020-0777-610.1038/s41563-020-0777-6 ↗
14. Thomas, N.; Smidt, T.; Kearnes, S.; Yang, L.; Li, L.; Kohlhoff, K.; Riley, P. Tensor field networks: Rotation-and translation-equivariant neural networks for 3d point clouds; arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.08219 , 2018. 10.48550/arXiv.1802.08219.10.48550/arXiv.1802.08219 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-022-29939-510.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
16. Batatia I. · Advances in neural information processing systems · 2022 · 35 · 1142310.52202/068431-0830 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0111110.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 ↗
18. 10.1038/s43246-022-00315-610.1038/s43246-022-00315-6 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.02103610.1103/PhysRevX.14.021036 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.01410410.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cossms.2025.10121410.1016/j.cossms.2025.101214 ↗
22. Batatia, I., A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00096 , 2023. 10.48550/arXiv.2401.00096.10.48550/arXiv.2401.00096 ↗
23. Rhodes, B., Orb-v3: atomistic simulation at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.06231 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2504.06231.10.48550/arXiv.2504.06231 ↗
24. Lysogorskiy, Y., Graph atomic cluster expansion for foundational machine learning interatomic potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.17936 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2508.1793610.48550/arXiv.2508.17936 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20221078810.1002/adma.202210788 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.03710.1016/j.commatsci.2014.10.037 ↗
28. Barroso-Luque, L., Open materials 2024 (omat24) inorganic materials dataset and models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.12771 , 2024. 10.48550/arXiv.2410.12771.10.48550/arXiv.2410.12771 ↗
29. Levine, D. S., The open molecules 2025 (omol25) dataset, evaluations, and models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08762 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08762.10.48550/arXiv.2505.08762 ↗
30. Yang, H., Mattersim: A deep learning atomistic model across elements, temperatures and pressures. arXiv , 2024. 10.48550/arXiv.2405.0496710.48550/arXiv.2405.04967 ↗
31. 10.1021/jacs.4c1445510.1021/jacs.4c14455 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c0206410.1021/acs.jpcc.5c02064 ↗
33. 10.1063/5.028406310.1063/5.0284063 ↗
34. Flötotto, A., Large-scale cooperative sulfur vacancy dynamics in two-dimensional mos2 from machine learning interatomic potentials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.13790 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2508.13790.10.48550/arXiv.2508.13790 ↗
35. Weiske, H., Statistics makes a difference: Machine learning adsorption dynamics of functionalized cyclooctine on si (001) at dft accuracy. arXiv preprint , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2509.14828.10.48550/arXiv.2509.14828 ↗
36. 10.1063/5.026814910.1063/5.0268149 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41524-025-01727-x10.1038/s41524-025-01727-x ↗
38. Liu, X., Fine-tuning universal machine-learned interatomic potentials: A tutorial on methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21935 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2506.21935.10.48550/arXiv.2506.21935 ↗
39. 10.1039/D4FD00107A10.1039/D4FD00107A ↗
40. Hanseroth, J.; Gromann, M.; Grunert, M.; Runge, E.; Dreler, C. High-throughput screening and mechanistic insights into solid acid proton conductors, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15268, 2026 10.48550/arXiv.2602.15268.10.48550/arXiv.2602.15268 ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c0019010.1021/acs.jctc.4c00190 ↗
42. 10.48550/arXiv.2410.2257010.48550/arXiv.2410.22570 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c0149910.1021/acs.jpclett.5c01499 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41467-023-42874-310.1038/s41467-023-42874-3 ↗
45. 10.1073/pnas.202038911810.1073/pnas.2020389118 ↗
46. 10.1038/s42256-024-00956-x10.1038/s42256-024-00956-x ↗
47. 10.1038/s43588-022-00349-310.1038/s43588-022-00349-3 ↗
48. Eissler, M., How simple can you go? an off-the-shelf transformer approach to molecular dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.01431 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2503.01431.10.48550/arXiv.2503.01431 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
50. 10.1038/s42256-023-00716-310.1038/s42256-023-00716-3 ↗
51. Riebesell, J., Matbench discovery–a framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14920 , 2023. 10.1038/s42256-025-01055-1.10.1038/s42256-025-01055-1 ↗
52. Chiang, Y., MLIP arena: Advancing fairness and transparency in machine learning interatomic potentials through an open and accessible benchmark platform. In AI for Accelerated Materials Design - ICLR 2025 , 2025.
53. 10.1016/j.ssi.2004.03.04210.1016/j.ssi.2004.03.042 ↗
54. 10.1021/cm020138b10.1021/cm020138b ↗
55. 10.1039/C9CP06473G10.1039/C9CP06473G ↗
56. 10.1021/jacs.0c0887010.1021/jacs.0c08870 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c0152110.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01521 ↗
58. 10.1002/smll.20250093110.1002/smll.202500931 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0155510.1021/acs.jpcc.2c01555 ↗
60. 10.1088/2515-7655/ada63910.1088/2515-7655/ada639 ↗
61. 10.1107/S160053681302975910.1107/S1600536813029759 ↗
62. Qaisrani, M. N., Bridging atomistic and mesoscale lithium transport via machine-learned force fields and markov state models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.20863 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2511.20863.10.48550/arXiv.2511.20863 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0397710.1021/acsnano.8b03977 ↗
64. 10.1002/aelm.20230063510.1002/aelm.202300635 ↗
65. 10.1080/0026897970948211910.1080/00268979709482119 ↗
66. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.parco.2014.03.01210.1016/j.parco.2014.03.012 ↗
68. 10.1063/5.000704510.1063/5.0007045 ↗
69. Iannuzzi, M., The cp2k program package made simple. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.15559 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2508.15559.10.48550/arXiv.2508.15559 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.01410.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 ↗
71. 10.1063/1.277070810.1063/1.2770708 ↗
72. 10.1063/1.154315410.1063/1.1543154 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.364110.1103/PhysRevB.58.3641 ↗
74. 10.1007/s00214-005-0655-y10.1007/s00214-005-0655-y ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.170310.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevA.38.309810.1103/PhysRevA.38.3098 ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.78510.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 ↗
78. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
79. 10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
80. 10.1080/0026897840010120110.1080/00268978400101201 ↗
81. 10.1063/1.46394010.1063/1.463940 ↗
82. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
83. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
84. Kasoar, E.; Austin, H.; Devereux, H.; Harris, K.; Mason, D.; Wilkins, J.; Zanca, F.; Elena, A. janus-core (v0.8.7) , 2026, 10.5281/zenodo.18713710, visited on 2026-01-21.10.5281/zenodo.18713710 ↗
85. Bidoggia, D., Automated training of neural-network interatomic potentials. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.11703 , 2025. 10.48550/arXiv.2509.1170310.48550/arXiv.2509.11703 ↗
86. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0406110.1021/acs.chemmater.1c04061 ↗
87. Geiger, M.; Smidt, T. e3nn: Euclidean neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.09453 , 2022. 10.48550/arXiv.2207.09453.10.48550/arXiv.2207.09453 ↗