Probing Electrocatalytic Gas Evolution Reaction at Pt by Force Noise Measurements. Part 1. Hydrogen
Source abstract
Abstract
Electrocatalytic processes occurring at a heterogeneous interface are complex, and their understanding at the molecular level remains challenging. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) can detect force interactions down to the atomic level, but so far it has been mainly used to obtain in situ images of electrocatalysts. Here, for the first time, we employ AFM to investigate gas evolution at a platinum ultramicroelectrode (Pt UME) under electrochemical conditions using force noise measurements. We detect excess force noise when individual H 2 gas bubble nucleation, growth, and detachment events occur at the Pt UME. Based on our in situ AFM, electrochemical, and optical microscopy analyses, we conclude that larger size H 2 gas bubbles remain pinned to the UME surface while smaller H 2 gas bubbles are released until an overpotential of −0.8 V vs RHE. This study demonstrates the viability of in situ AFM in studying gas evolution under electrocatalytic conditions and contributes to a mechanistic understanding of the H 2 gas bubble detachments during the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 rue University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2T8
Department of Chemistry, Queen’s University, 90 Bader Lane, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6
Funding
National Research Council Canada · Fonds de recherche du Qu?bec ? Nature et technologies · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.00510.1016/j.joule.2020.01.005 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0015710.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00157 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c0021110.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00211 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41557-023-01294-y10.1038/s41557-023-01294-y ↗
5. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0273610.1021/acsenergylett.4c02736 ↗
6. 10.1021/jacs.7b1345710.1021/jacs.7b13457 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0011910.1021/acs.langmuir.9b00119 ↗
8. 10.1021/jacs.4c0201810.1021/jacs.4c02018 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0767410.1021/acsnano.0c07674 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0101510.1021/acsnano.9b01015 ↗
11. 10.1021/la402496z10.1021/la402496z ↗
12. 10.1021/jz501898r10.1021/jz501898r ↗
13. 10.1021/la500234r10.1021/la500234r ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0105928810.1007/BF01059288 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0822910.1021/acsnano.6b08229 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.21450310.1103/PhysRevLett.123.214503 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.03510510.1103/PhysRevE.106.035105 ↗
18. 10.1039/C8CP01050A10.1039/C8CP01050A ↗
19. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.18710.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.187 ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.220582711910.1073/pnas.2205827119 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c0138810.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01388 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.347010710.1063/1.3470107 ↗
23. 10.1021/jacs.2c1261710.1021/jacs.2c12617 ↗
24. 10.1021/la060859f10.1021/la060859f ↗
25. 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.98110.1103/RevModPhys.87.981 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.04710.1016/j.jcis.2011.12.047 ↗
27. 10.1021/jacs.9b0447910.1021/jacs.9b04479 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.electacta.2003.11.00810.1016/j.electacta.2003.11.008 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12678-018-0454-610.1007/s12678-018-0454-6 ↗
30. 10.5194/acp-23-10901-202310.5194/acp-23-10901-2023 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.114555010.1063/1.1145550 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00249005011310.1007/s002490050113 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.186910.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1869 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.17450310.1103/PhysRevLett.126.174503 ↗
35. Klausner J. · Multiphase Science and Technology · 2001 · 13 · 35