journal article·2025-01-09

Toward Collective Chemistry under Strong Light-Matter Coupling

Bing Gu

Publisher page

Abstract

Collective strong light-matter coupling provides a versatile means to manipulate physicochemical properties of molecules and materials. Understanding collective polaritonic dynamics is hindered by the macroscopic number of molecules interacting collectively with photonic modes. We develop a many-body theory to investigate the spectroscopy and dynamics of a molecular ensemble embedded in an optical cavity in the collective strong coupling regime. This theory is constructed by a pseudoparticle representation of the molecular Hamiltonian, which maps the polaritonic Hamiltonian into a coupled fermion-boson model under particle number constraints. The mapped model is then analyzed using the nonequilibrium Green’s function theory with the self-energy diagrams identified through a large N expansion. We demonstrate that in the thermodynamic limit, the necessary condition to have any collective effects is to have a macroscopic cavity field. Numerical illustrations are shown for the driven Tavis–Cummings model, which shows an excellent agreement with exact results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Strong Light-Matter Interactions · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry and Department of Physics

Westlake University

Institute of Natural Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.aba354410.1126/science.aba3544 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.19640510.1103/PhysRevLett.106.196405 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.abd033610.1126/science.abd0336 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.aau774210.1126/science.aau7742 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20110703310.1002/anie.201107033 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0159910.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01599 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0228210.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02282 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0038110.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00381 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.25300110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.253001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2018.02.00810.1016/j.chemphys.2018.02.008 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.161550911410.1073/pnas.1615509114 ↗
12. 10.1515/nanoph-2018-006710.1515/nanoph-2018-0067 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.02105710.1103/PhysRevX.9.021057 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.04102210.1103/PhysRevX.5.041022 ↗
15. 10.1039/D1SC04341B10.1039/D1SC04341B ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0223610.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02236 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0085510.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00855 ↗
18. 10.1039/D1SC01774H10.1039/D1SC01774H ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c0028010.1021/acs.accounts.3c00280 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0382910.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03829 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.01212110.1103/PhysRevA.101.012121 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.511655010.1063/1.5116550 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c0078810.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00788 ↗
24. 10.1063/5.016724310.1063/5.0167243 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0086410.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00864 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b0029510.1021/acs.accounts.6b00295 ↗
27. 10.1063/5.005529610.1063/5.0055296 ↗
28. 10.1073/pnas.221922312010.1073/pnas.2219223120 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.007754910.1063/5.0077549 ↗
30. 10.1063/5.004630710.1063/5.0046307 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b0038810.1021/acs.jctc.7b00388 ↗
32. Stefanucci G. · 201310.1017/CBO9781139023979 ↗
33. Kamenev A. · 201110.1017/CBO9781139003667 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.501839910.1063/1.5018399 ↗
35. 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.04500310.1103/RevModPhys.94.045003 ↗
36. Cohen-Tannoudji C. · 1989
37. 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.46710.1103/PhysRevA.43.467 ↗
38. Frésard R. · 2012 · 65
39. 10.1063/1.493614310.1063/1.4936143 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A79610.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.04320110.1103/PhysRevLett.117.043201 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.06420510.1103/PhysRevB.105.064205 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.21360210.1103/PhysRevLett.130.213602 ↗