journal article·2010-08

Constraint-dependent twin variant distribution in Ni2MnGa single crystal, polycrystals and thin film: An EBSD study

N. Scheerbaum, Y.W. Lai, T. Leisegang, M. Thomas, J. Liu, K. Khlopkov, J. McCord, S. Fähler, R. Träger, D.C. Meyer, L. Schultz, O. Gutfleisch

Acta Materialia· Volume 58· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The capability of showing large magnetically induced strains (MFIS) up to ∼10% has attracted considerable research interest to magnetic shape memory (MSM) alloys. The prototype MSM alloy is the ternary Ni2MnGa. In this work, a comprehensive study of the local unit cell orientation distribution on single crystalline, polycrystalline and epitaxial thin film of martensitic Ni2MnGa is conducted by electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD). By EBSD, the constraint-dependent twin variant distribution, the corresponding stresses and the three-dimensional orientation of twin planes will be investigated. In polycrystals, the differentiation between twin and grain boundaries as well as proof of twin boundary motion is shown. From the knowledge of the local unit cell orientation at surfaces, it is possible to explain the magnetic domain configuration imaged by magnetic force microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Vasil’ev · Physics – Uspekhi · 2003 · 46 · 55910.1070/PU2003v046n06ABEH001339 ↗
2. Heczko · 2009
3. Ullakko · Appl Phys Lett · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
4. Sozinov · Appl Phys Lett · 2002 · 80 · 174610.1063/1.1458075 ↗
5. Doerr · Eur Phys J – Special Top · 2008 · 158 · 12510.1140/epjst/e2008-00664-4 ↗
6. Pons · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 302710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00130-0 ↗
7. Righi · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 523710.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.040 ↗
8. Gaitzsch · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 36510.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.017 ↗
9. Scheerbaum · New J Phys · 2008 · 10 · 07300210.1088/1367-2630/10/7/073002 ↗
10. Tian · Mater Lett · 2009 · 63 · 172910.1016/j.matlet.2009.05.004 ↗
11. Liu · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 16250910.1063/1.2913162 ↗
12. Scheerbaum · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 09C50110.1063/1.2670414 ↗
13. Feuchtwanger · J Phys – Condens Matter · 2008 · 20 · 10424710.1088/0953-8984/20/10/104247 ↗
14. Conti · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 481 · 35110.1016/j.msea.2007.04.126 ↗
15. Scheerbaum · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 270710.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.008 ↗
16. Thomas · Adv Mater · 2009 · 21 · 370810.1002/adma.200900469 ↗
17. Schwarzer · Micron · 1997 · 28 · 24910.1016/S0968-4328(97)00010-3 ↗
18. Dingley · J Mater Sci · 1992 · 27 · 454510.1007/BF01165988 ↗
19. Cong · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 473110.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.045 ↗
20. Lai · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 19250410.1063/1.2737934 ↗
21. Hubert · 1998
22. Dong · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 259310.1063/1.1643199 ↗
23. Jenkins · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 23410110.1063/1.3044473 ↗
24. Spasova · Phys Status Solidi A · 2008 · 205 · 230710.1002/pssa.200778805 ↗
25. Thomas · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 19251510.1063/1.2931082 ↗