Pattern formation during cubic to orthorhombic martensitic transformations in shape memory alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The superelasticity and shape memory effect of shape memory alloys originate from martensitic transformations (MT) that produce self-accommodated polydomain structures. In order to understand the formation mechanism of various domain patterns, a phase field model of cubic to orthorhombic MT in NiTiPt and NiTiCu is formulated, through which microstructure evolutions dominated by long-range elastic interactions are simulated. A rich variety of morphological patterns are predicted and analyzed. In particular, autocatalytic events leading to multi-variant “pyramidal triangular” and “nested triangular” configurations in NiTiCu are revealed. These morphological patterns are beyond the reach of the classical phenomenological theory of martensitic crystallography (PTMC). The simulation predictions agree well with experimental observations. By distinguishing deformation variant from orientation variant, the theoretical connection and distinction between PTMC and phase field microelasticity theory are discussed, and their predictions are compared with experimental observations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (67)
Show source-provided references
1. Kohl · 2004
2. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
3. 1998
4. Bhattacharya · Nature · 2004 · 428 · 5510.1038/nature02378 ↗
5. Gao Y, Dregia SA, Wang Y,unpublished work.
6. Otsuka · Scr Metall · 1977 · 11 · 75710.1016/0036-9748(77)90071-0 ↗
7. Bhattacharya · 2004
8. Saburi · Scr Metall · 1984 · 18 · 36310.1016/0036-9748(84)90453-8 ↗
9. Gao · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 151410.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.043 ↗
10. Wang · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 97 · 22570310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.225703 ↗
11. Yang · Scr Mater · 2012 · 67 · 14510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.04.003 ↗
12. Bigelow · Scr Mater · 2011 · 64 · 72510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.028 ↗
13. Kovarik · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 466010.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.039 ↗
14. Wang · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 105 · 20570210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.205702 ↗
15. Wang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 620610.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.040 ↗
16. Schroeder · Scr Metall · 1977 · 11 · 22510.1016/0036-9748(77)90058-8 ↗
17. Schroeder · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 137510.1016/0001-6160(77)90069-4 ↗
18. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 1972 · 21 · 10510.1063/1.1654289 ↗
19. Salje · 1990
20. Khachaturyan · 1983
21. Cahn · J Chem Phys · 1958 · 28 · 25810.1063/1.1744102 ↗
22. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1961 · 9 · 52510.1016/0001-6160(61)90155-9 ↗
23. Wang · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 75910.1016/S1359-6454(96)00180-2 ↗
24. Jin · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 230910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00108-2 ↗
25. Wechsler · Trans AIME · 1953 · 197 · 1503
26. Bowles · Acta Metall · 1954 · 2 · 12910.1016/0001-6160(54)90102-9 ↗
27. Wayman · 1964
28. Bain · Trans AIME · 1924 · 70 · 25
29. Gao Y, Shi R, Dregia SA, et al.,unpublished work.
30. Symmetry in solid-solid transformation morphologies
31. Saburi · ISIJ Int · 1989 · 29 · 40510.2355/isijinternational.29.405 ↗
32. Gao · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 481910.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.013 ↗
33. Huang · Nat Mater · 2003 · 2 · 30710.1038/nmat884 ↗
34. Noebe · 2005 · vol. 5761
35. Bozzolo · Intermetallics · 2008 · 16 · 66810.1016/j.intermet.2008.02.003 ↗
36. Moberly WJ, Proft JL, Duerig TW, et al. In: Muddle BC, editor. Martensitic transformations II. Materials science forum, Trans. Tech. Pub., vols. 56–58. p. 605–610.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.56-58.605 ↗
37. Wang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 121210.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.041 ↗
38. Boettinger · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 16310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.101901.155803 ↗
39. Zhou · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 668510.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.033 ↗
40. Zhou · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 348410.1016/j.actamat.2011.02.022 ↗
41. Artemev · Philos Mag A – Phys Condens Matter Struct Defect Mech Prop · 2002 · 82 · 1249
42. Artemev · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 250310.1016/S1359-6454(00)00071-9 ↗
43. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2006 · 438 · 5510.1016/j.msea.2006.04.123 ↗
44. Chen · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2002 · 32 · 11310.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112001.132041 ↗
45. Olson · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 1999 · 273 · 1110.1016/S0921-5093(99)00286-5 ↗
46. Chu · Metall Mater Trans A – Phys Metall Mater Sci · 2000 · 31 · 132110.1007/s11661-000-0251-7 ↗
47. Petschek · J Chem Phys · 1983 · 79 · 344310.1063/1.446194 ↗
48. Rogers · Phys Rev B · 1988 · 37 · 963810.1103/PhysRevB.37.9638 ↗
49. Langevin · CR Hebd Acad Sci · 1908 · 146 · 530
50. Hatcher · 2009 · 02010
51. Shen · Metall Mater Trans A – Phys Metall Mater Sci · 2008 · 39A · 97610.1007/s11661-007-9302-7 ↗
52. Wang · J Am Ceram Soc · 1995 · 78 · 65710.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08228.x ↗
53. Shen · 2010 · vol. 22A
54. Teng · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 637210.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.016 ↗
55. Nishida · Mater Sci Technol · 2008 · 24 · 88410.1179/174328408X302549 ↗
56. Meng · Scr Mater · 2008 · 59 · 45110.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.04.023 ↗
57. Wen · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 412510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00186-5 ↗
58. Shibata · Scr Mater · 2005 · 53 · 59710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.023 ↗
59. Miyamoto · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 112010.1016/j.actamat.2008.10.050 ↗
60. Miyamoto · Scr Mater · 2009 · 60 · 111310.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.053 ↗
61. Shen · Scr Mater · 2009 · 60 · 90110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.02.007 ↗
62. Wang · J Appl Phys · 2002 · 92 · 135110.1063/1.1492859 ↗
63. Zhou · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 615610.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.027 ↗
64. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 113 · 997810.1063/1.1323224 ↗
65. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2000 · 113 · 990110.1063/1.1329672 ↗
66. Zhang · J Sci Comput · 2008 · 37 · 8910.1007/s10915-008-9207-7 ↗
67. Backofen · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2010 · 22 · 364104