journal article·2004-11

The effect of simulated hypervelocity space debris on polymers

R. Verker, N. Eliaz, I. Gouzman, S. Eliezer, M. Fraenkel, S. Maman, F. Beckmann, K. Pranzas, E. Grossman

Acta Materialia· Volume 52· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Space debris population in low Earth orbit has been increasing constantly with the increase in spacecraft missions. Hypervelocity space debris impacts limit the functionality of polymeric outer surfaces and, in extreme cases, might cause a total loss of a spacecraft. In this work, the fracture of Kapton films by ultrahigh velocity impacts was studied. A laser-driven flyer ground simulation system was used to accelerate aluminum flyers to impact velocities as high as 2.9 km/s against polymer films with different thicknesses. Scanning electron microscopy was used to characterize the fracture morphology. Impact effects on the internal structure of the polymer were studied by means of X-ray microtomography. It was found that with an increase in debris velocity, a ductile-to-brittle transition occurred. However, fractures created by impacts at velocities above 1.7 km/s showed central impacts regions, which experienced the highest strain rate and were of ductile-type fracture, while the outer regions, which experienced a lower strain rate, failed through brittle cracking. A model explaining this phenomenon, based on the temperature gradient developed within the impacted region during collision, is presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Planetary Science and Exploration · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Grossman · J. Spacecraft Rockets · 2003 · 40 · 11010.2514/2.3922 ↗
2. Houdayer · Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B · 1997 · 131 · 33510.1016/S0168-583X(97)00362-5 ↗
3. Silverman EM, Space Environmental Effects on Spacecraft – LEO Material Selection Guide, NASA Contractor Report No. 4661. Langley Research Center, 1995. p. 4-1
4. Tennyson · 1997 · 485
5. Hastings · 1996
6. Miao · Planet. Space Sci. · 2001 · 49 · 92710.1016/S0032-0633(01)00042-3 ↗
7. Paul · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 1997 · 20 · 62710.1016/S0734-743X(97)87450-7 ↗
8. Stein · 2000
9. Medina · Adv. Space Res. · 2001 · 28 · 134710.1016/S0273-1177(01)00410-0 ↗
10. Tighe · 2000
11. Roybal · Int. J. Impact Eng. · 1999 · 23 · 81110.1016/S0734-743X(99)00126-8 ↗
12. Eliezer · 2002
13. Elmoutaouakkil · J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 36 · A3710.1088/0022-3727/36/10A/308 ↗
14. Tadic · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 333510.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.007 ↗
15. Gilath · J. Mater. Sci. Lett. · 1988 · 7 · 91510.1007/BF00720728 ↗
16. Du-Pont, Inc., Technical bulletin, http://www.dupont.com/kapton/general/H-38492-2.pdf
17. Dillon · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A · 2001 · 19 · 282610.1116/1.1407242 ↗
18. Callister · 2000 · 124
19. Spaepen · Acta Metall. · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
20. Akins JA. Dynamic Compression of Minerals in the MgO–FeO–SiO2 System, Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology, USA, 2003
21. Ramjaun D, Shinohara M, Kato I, Takayama K. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Symposium on Shock Waves, ISSW23, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 22–27 July, 2001
22. Smith · 1975
23. Cenna · Wear · 2003 · 254 · 58110.1016/S0043-1648(03)00067-X ↗