journal article·2008-08

Effect of ethnicity and treatments on in situ tensile response and morphological changes of human hair characterized by atomic force microscopy

Indira P. Seshadri, Bharat Bhushan

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Human hair fibers experience tensile forces during grooming and styling processes. The tensile response of hair is hence of considerable interest to the cosmetics industry. In this study, in situ tensile characterization studies have been carried out in an atomic force microscope (AFM) on different hair under different conditions. A custom-built AFM sample stage allows hair fibers to be loaded in tension. A technique to locate and image the same control area at different strains has been developed to study the changes in morphology that occur with deformation. Virgin Caucasian, Asian and African hair were studied to understand the differences between different ethnic hair types. Also, the tensile response and morphological changes of virgin, chemically damaged and conditioner-treated Caucasian hair after soaking were compared against the corresponding dry tensile response. Finally, virgin, damaged and treated Caucasian hair fibers were subjected to fatigue cycling to simulate combing/detangling, and their tensile response studied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Textile materials and evaluations · Silk-based biomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 1986
2. Robbins · 1994
3. Feughelman · 1997
4. 1997
5. Smith · J Microscopy · 2002 · 206 · 18210.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01028.x ↗
6. Bhushan · 2007
7. Kreplak · Biophys J · 2002 · 82 · 226510.1016/S0006-3495(02)75572-0 ↗
8. Akkermans · Phil Trans R Soc Lond A · 2004 · 362 · 178310.1098/rsta.2004.1395 ↗
9. Chen · J Microscopy · 2005 · 220 · 9610.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01517.x ↗
10. LaTorre · J Vac Sci Technol A · 2005 · 23 · 103410.1116/1.1863992 ↗
11. Bhushan · 2002
12. Tong · Scripta Metall Mater · 1997 · 36 · 133910.1016/S1359-6462(97)00024-9 ↗
13. Bobji · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 84410.1557/JMR.2001.0110 ↗
14. Bobji · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 3710.1016/S1359-6462(00)00557-1 ↗
15. Tambe · Ultramicroscopy · 2004 · 100 · 35910.1016/j.ultramic.2003.10.006 ↗
16. Henderson · J Soc Cosmet Chem · 1978 · 29 · 449
17. Swift · Int J Cosmet Sci · 1999 · 21 · 22710.1046/j.1467-2494.1999.186942.x ↗
18. Seshadri · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 77410.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.033 ↗
19. Wei · Ultramicroscopy · 2005 · 105 · 15510.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.033 ↗
20. Menkart · J Soc Cosmet Chem · 1984 · 35 · 21
21. Dekoi · J Dermatol · 1988 · 15 · 39310.1111/j.1346-8138.1988.tb04075.x ↗
22. Dekoi · J Dermatol · 1990 · 19 · 6210.1111/j.1346-8138.1990.tb01612.x ↗
23. Gray · Clinics in Dermatology · 2001 · 19 · 22710.1016/S0738-081X(00)00133-4 ↗
24. Thibaut · Brit J Dermatol · 2005 · 152 · 63210.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06521.x ↗
25. Thibaut · Int J Dermatol · 2005 · 44 · S210.1111/j.1365-4632.2005.02798.x ↗
26. Lindelof · Arch Dermatol · 1988 · 124 · 135910.1001/archderm.1988.01670090015003 ↗
27. Swift · J Cosmet Sci · 2000 · 51 · 193
28. LaTorre · J Cosmet Sci · 2006 · 57 · 37
29. Breakspear · J Microscopy · 2004 · 215 · 3410.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01355.x ↗
30. Kamath · J Soc Cosmet Chem · 1984 · 35 · 21
31. Ruetsch · J Soc Cosmet Chem · 1996 · 47 · 13
32. Robbins · J Soc Cosmet Chem · 1991 · 42 · 59
33. Spei · Melliand Textilberichte · 1979 · 60 · 523
34. Swift · Int J Cosmet Sci · 1991 · 13 · 14310.1111/j.1467-2494.1991.tb00558.x ↗
35. Kreplak · Biochim Biophys Acta · 2001 · 1547 · 26810.1016/S0167-4838(01)00195-9 ↗
36. O’Connor · J Invest Dermatol · 1995 · 105 · 9610.1111/1523-1747.ep12313377 ↗
37. Kelly · J Soc Comet Chem · 1982 · 33 · 203
38. Swift · 1997
39. Swift · J Soc Cosmet Chem · 1974 · 25 · 13
40. Bhushan · Wear · 2005 · 259 · 101210.1016/j.wear.2004.12.026 ↗