Hydride reorientation in Zr2.5Nb studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The crystallographic texture and stress state of hydride platelets of two different orientations precipitated in Zr2.5Nb pressure tubes were studied by synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments using an 80 keV photon beam and an area detector in transmission geometry. Circumferential and radial hydrides with platelet normals along the tube radial and circumferential directions, respectively, were precipitated in tube material loaded up to H contents of 130 wt.ppm. This macroscopic hydride orientation was controlled by application of a load along the tube hoop direction during hydride precipitation. The experiments show that both circumferential and radial platelets are composed of δ-hydrides precipitated in α-Zr grains from a wide range of orientations, but with a clear preference for Zr crystals with their c -axes at an angle of ∼15–20° from the hoop direction. Some moderate differences between the crystallographic texture of the two hydrides result from application of the load during precipitation. The results are explained in terms of an autocatalytic nucleation process and the Zr2.5Nb microstructure. A careful stress analysis revealed that both hydride types are compressed by the matrix on the plane of the platelet, with the largest stresses always found along the axial direction of the tube. Determination of the stress state of the hydride could be exploited as a diffraction signature of the hydride orientation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Simpson · J Nucl Mater · 1974 · 52 · 28910.1016/0022-3115(74)90174-3 ↗
2. Northwood · Int Met Rev · 1983 · 28 · 9210.1179/imr.1983.28.1.92 ↗
3. Louthan · J Nucl Mater · 1963 · 9 · 17010.1016/0022-3115(63)90132-6 ↗
4. Chu · J Nucl Mater · 2008 · 373 · 31910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.06.012 ↗
5. IAEA-TECDOC-1410; 2004.
6. Daum · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 392 · 45310.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.004 ↗
7. Santisteban · Powder Diff · 2009 · S7210.1154/1.3139056 ↗
8. Vicente Alvarez · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 221010.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.024 ↗
9. Steuwer · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 43110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.039 ↗
10. Kerr · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 93910.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.030 ↗
11. Kerr · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 34110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.10.031 ↗
12. Hardie · J Nucl Mater · 1974 · 50 · 4010.1016/0022-3115(74)90058-0 ↗
13. Singh · J Nucl Mater · 2006 · 359 · 20810.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.09.004 ↗
14. Colas · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 657510.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.018 ↗
15. Santisteban · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 660910.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.022 ↗
16. Banchik AD, Bianchi DR, Vizcaı´no P, Flores AV, Zsieber CW, Gaveta LJ, et al. Technical report CNEA DD-ATN40MF-001; 2009.
17. Kaufmann PD, Danielson P, Baroch EF. ASTM, ASTM STP 551; 1974. p. 52.10.1520/STP32103S ↗
18. Haeffner · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 399 · 12010.1016/j.msea.2005.02.023 ↗
19. Vizcaino P, Santisteban JR, Vicente Alvarez MA, Flores AV, Almer J. Acta Mater, in preparation.
20. Hielscher · J Appl Crystallogr · 2008 · 102410.1107/S0021889808030112 ↗
21. Holt · J Nucl Mater · 1985 · 135 · 24610.1016/0022-3115(85)90084-4 ↗
22. Holt · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 335 · 52010.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.07.043 ↗
23. Carpenter · J Nucl Mater · 1973 · 48 · 26410.1016/0022-3115(73)90022-6 ↗
24. Perovic · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 138110.1016/0001-6160(83)90008-1 ↗
25. Marshall · J Nucl Mater · 1967 · 24 · 4910.1016/0022-3115(67)90079-7 ↗