Dynamic recovery and its orientation dependence in face-centered cubic crystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The orientation dependence of dynamic recovery in face-centered cubic crystals is investigated in relation to the critical annihilation distance of screw dislocations. The critical conditions for the onset of stage III are discussed in terms of a cross-slip mechanism that is locally modified by the interaction with a neighboring attractive screw dislocation. Two orientation domains are defined. From [ 1 ¯ 1 1 ] to the central region of the standard stereographic triangle, the attractive interaction stress enforces obtuse cross-slip, which inhibits dynamic recovery. The critical parameters for dynamic recovery are then derived using simple scaling laws. For other orientations, the interaction stress enhances cross-slip, which is treated using Escaig’s model. Numerical results are obtained using a single adjustable parameter. They are fully consistent with experimental data in copper and silver at 300 K. The discussion emphasizes the need for more precise information from atomic-scale modeling of the dynamic recovery process.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Devincre · Science · 2008 · 320 · 174510.1126/science.1156101 ↗
2. Kubin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 604010.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.012 ↗
3. Kocks · Progr Mater Sci · 2003 · 48 · 17110.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗
4. Kubin · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 402310.1080/14786430500525241 ↗
5. Nabarro · 1986 · vol. 3 · 1667
6. Flow stress and work hardening
7. Argon · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 47 · 68310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00187-2 ↗
8. Mitchell · Prog Appl Mater Res · 1964 · 6 · 117
9. Diehl · Z Metallkde · 1956 · 47 · 331
10. Miura · Trans JIM Suppl · 1968 · 9 · 655
11. Devincre · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 90510.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.026 ↗
12. Gottstein · Acta Metall · 1975 · 23 · 64110.1016/0001-6160(75)90105-4 ↗
13. Vorbrugg · Phys Stat Sol (b) · 1971 · 46 · 25710.1002/pssb.2220460123 ↗
14. Essmann · Philos Mag A · 1979 · 40 · 73110.1080/01418617908234871 ↗
15. Jackson · Progr Mater Sci · 1985 · 29 · 13910.1016/0079-6425(85)90009-X ↗
16. Madec · Science · 2003 · 301 · 187910.1126/science.1085477 ↗
17. Kocks · J Eng Mat Eng Technol · 1976 · 98 · 7610.1115/1.3443340 ↗
18. Takeuchi · Trans JIM · 1975 · 16 · 62910.2320/matertrans1960.16.629 ↗
19. Escaig · 1968 · 655
20. Bonneville · Acta Metall · 1979 · 27 · 147710.1016/0001-6160(79)90170-6 ↗
21. Caillard · 2003
22. Ramaswami · Trans AIME · 1965 · 233 · 1632
23. Escaig · J Phys · 1968 · 29 · 22510.1051/jphys:01968002902-3022500 ↗
24. Takeuchi · J Phys Soc Jpn · 1976 · 41 · 49010.1143/JPSJ.41.490 ↗
25. Takeuchi · J Phys Soc Jpn · 1976 · 40 · 74110.1143/JPSJ.40.741 ↗
26. Brown · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 1691
27. Vegge · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2002 · 12 · 2929
28. Rao · Philos Mag · 1999 · 79 · 116710.1080/01418619908210354 ↗
29. Saada · Mater Sci Eng A · 1991 · 137 · 17710.1016/0921-5093(91)90333-I ↗
30. Püshl · Progr Mater Sci · 2002 · 47 · 41510.1016/S0079-6425(01)00003-2 ↗
31. Püschl · 1994 · 97