Comparison of local and global texture in HDDR processed Nd–Fe–B magnets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The local texture in polycrystalline Nd–Fe–B powder particles processed by hydrogenation disproportionation desorption and recombination (HDDR) has, for the first time, been observed directly by electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). The local texture quality was found to vary strongly with the hydrogen pressure applied during HDDR processing. At 0.3 bar, a strong biaxial local texture occurs in the individual powder particles. Increasing the hydrogen pressure during HDDR results initially in a lower texture quality and finally leads to near-isotropic particles. Clusters of similarly oriented grains within near-isotropic particles were observed rather than a completely random spatial distribution of orientations. The local texture within the powder particles was shown to be critical in determining the magnetic properties of compacts produced by aligning the powder in an external magnetic field. A compact produced from the powder with the strongest local texture (processed at 0.3 bar) showed highly anisotropic magnetic properties with remanence (related to the density of Nd 2 Fe 14 B) parallel and perpendicular to the applied field direction of 1.24 T and 0.55 T, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Walmer MH, Liu JF, Dent PC. In: Proceedings of the 20th international workshop on rare earth magnets and their applications, vol. 37; 2008.
2. Sugimoto S. In: Proceeding of the 21st international workshop on rare earth magnets and their applications, vol. 103; 2010.
3. Gutfleisch O, Liu JP, Willard M, Brück E, Chen C, Shankar SG. Magnetic materials and devices for the 21st century: stronger, lighter, and more energy efficient (invited review). Adv Mater; in press, doi:10.1002/adma.201002180.10.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
4. Gutfleisch · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 2000 · 33 · R15710.1088/0022-3727/33/17/201 ↗
5. Tao · J Alloy Compd · 2009 · 477 · 51010.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.119 ↗
6. Honkura Y. In: Proceedings of the 19th international workshop on rare earth magnets and their applications, vol. 231; 2006.
7. Hamada · IEEE Trans Magn · 2005 · 41 · 384710.1109/TMAG.2005.854870 ↗
8. Mishima · J Magn Soc Jpn · 2000 · 24 · 40710.3379/jmsjmag.24.407 ↗
9. Sugimoto · J Alloy Compd · 1997 · 260 · 28410.1016/S0925-8388(97)00175-8 ↗
10. Takeshita T, Nakayama R. In: Proceedings of the 10th international workshop on rare earth magnets and their applications, vol. 551; 1989.
11. McGuiness · J Less-Common Metals · 1990 · 158 · 37910.1016/0022-5088(90)90353-L ↗
12. Gutfleisch · J Phys D: Appl Phys · 1996 · 29 · 225510.1088/0022-3727/29/9/006 ↗
13. Gutfleisch · IEEE Trans Magn · 2003 · 39 · 292610.1109/TMAG.2003.815749 ↗
14. Honkura · J Magn Magn Mater · 2005 · 290–291 · 128210.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.423 ↗
15. Sugimoto · J Alloy Compd · 2002 · 330–332 · 89210.1016/S0925-8388(01)01503-1 ↗
16. Sugimoto S, Ohga S, Inomata K, Okada M, Suzuki K, Konno T, et al. Proceedings of the 17th international workshop on rare earth magnets and their applications, vol. 636; 2002.
17. Kubis · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 83 · 690510.1063/1.367589 ↗
18. Tomida · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 87510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00399-1 ↗
19. Sugimoto · IEEE Trans Magn · 2002 · 38 · 296110.1109/TMAG.2002.803079 ↗
20. Dingley · J Mater Sci · 1992 · 27 · 454510.1007/BF01165988 ↗
21. Dingley · J Microsc · 2003 · 213 · 214
22. Randle · 2000 · vol. 162
23. Lillywhite · J Microsc · 2002 · 205 · 27010.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.00990.x ↗
24. Khlopkov · J Alloy Compd · 2004 · 365 · 25910.1016/S0925-8388(03)00636-4 ↗
25. Woodcock · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 102610.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.033 ↗
26. Woodcock · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 82610.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.01.028 ↗