Fatigue of a laterally constrained closed cell aluminum foam
Source abstract
Abstract
An experimental investigation into the constant stress amplitude compression–compression fatigue behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam, both with and without lateral constraint, was conducted. Results show that while the early stages of strain accumulation due to fatigue loading are independent of constraint, the rapid strain accumulation stage behaviors are sensitive to the constraint. This was ascribed to the noticeable hardening with plastic deformation observed under constraint during quasi-static loading, which in turn reduces the effective maximum stress experienced by the foam specimen during fatigue loading. This was demonstrated through a simple empirical model that connects fatigue strain accumulation without constraint to that under constraint. Complementary X-ray tomography experiments suggest that the fatigue behavior of the foams is relatively less sensitive to morphological defects such as missing walls than the quasi-static mechanical properties such as plastic strength. Evaluation of the energy absorption behavior suggests that the damage that accumulates during fatigue does not affect the energy-absorbing ability of the foam adversely.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson · 1997
2. Ramachandra · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 74110.1016/S1359-6462(03)00431-7 ↗
3. Sudheer Kumar · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 347 · 33010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00608-1 ↗
4. Sugimura · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · A269 · 3810.1016/S0921-5093(99)00147-1 ↗
5. Harte · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 251110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00097-X ↗
6. Banhart · J Mater Sci Lett · 1999 · 18 · 61710.1023/A:1006646901741 ↗
7. Zhou · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · A369 · 2310.1016/j.msea.2003.08.009 ↗
8. Amsterdam · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 446510.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.033 ↗
9. Zhou · Trans ASME · 2005 · 127 · 4010.1115/1.1900148 ↗
10. Zettl · Int J Fatigue · 2001 · 23 · 56510.1016/S0142-1123(01)00025-1 ↗
11. Bastawros · J Mech Phys Solids · 2000 · 48 · 30110.1016/S0022-5096(99)00035-6 ↗
12. Olurin · Int J Fatigue · 2001 · 23 · 37510.1016/S0142-1123(01)00010-X ↗
13. Motz · Int J Fatigue · 2005 · 27 · 157110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.044 ↗
14. Kolluri · Met Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 200610.1007/s11661-007-9245-z ↗
15. Ramamurty · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 18110.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.004 ↗
16. Paul · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 40 · 80910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00037-8 ↗
17. Akiyama S, Ueno H, Imagawa K, Kitahara A, Nagata S, Morimoto K, Nishikawa T, Itoh M. Foamed metal and method of producing the same. US Patent 4,713,277; 1987.
18. Banhart · Prog Mater Sci · 2001 · 46 · 55910.1016/S0079-6425(00)00002-5 ↗
19. Andrews · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · A270 · 11310.1016/S0921-5093(99)00170-7 ↗
20. Simone · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 213910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00421-7 ↗
21. Ramamurty · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 86910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.021 ↗
22. Garcia-Moreno · Adv Eng Mater · 2004 · 6 · 41610.1002/adem.200405143 ↗
23. Ashby · 2000
24. Karthikeyan · Met Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 201410.1007/s11661-007-9213-7 ↗
25. Chen · J Mech Phys Solids · 1999 · 47 · 223510.1016/S0022-5096(99)00030-7 ↗
26. Sugimura · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 524510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00148-1 ↗
27. Simone · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 310910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00017-2 ↗
28. Evans · Prog Mater Sci · 1998 · 43 · 17110.1016/S0079-6425(98)00004-8 ↗
29. Paul · Mater Sci Eng A · 2000 · 281 · 110.1016/S0921-5093(99)00750-9 ↗