Molecular dynamics simulation of enhanced interfacial cohesive behavior of Ni-coated MWCNT/Mg composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Debonding processes of different Ni-coated MWCNT/Mg interface models were studied by molecular dynamics simulations, and the stress–displacement relationships of different interface models were obtained by fitting a modified exponential cohesive zone law for interface. In addition, the debonding behaviors of Ni-coated and uncoated MWCNT/Mg interface were compared. The results show that CNT wall numbers and inner diameters as well as interface orientations have significant effects on the Ni-coated and uncoated MWCNT/Mg interface cohesive-zone model parameters. Compared with the above two kinds of uncoated MWCNT/Mg interface models, the average values of the peak stress and the work of separation for the Ni-coated MWCNT/Mg interface models are both increased significantly, showing that the addition of a Ni-modified coating on the surface of MWCNTs can effectively enhance the adhesion capacity of the MWCNT/Mg interface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Department of Engineering Mechanics, Faculty of Vehicle Engineering and Mechanics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.05310.1016/j.jallcom.2012.11.053 ↗
2. 10.1080/09276440.2016.114491110.1080/09276440.2016.1144911 ↗
3. 10.1080/09276440.2018.146014210.1080/09276440.2018.1460142 ↗
4. Liang J, Li H, Hu X, et al. Fabrication of Ni-coated carbon nanotubes reinforced magnesium matrix composites, in: International Conference on Manipulation, Manufacturing and Measurement on the Nanoscale (3M-NANO), SuZhou, China, IEEE, 2014, 299–302.10.1109/3M-NANO.2013.6737436 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.06910.1016/j.carbon.2018.02.069 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.01510.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.015 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.027 ↗
8. 10.1177/002199831557271010.1177/0021998315572710 ↗
9. 10.1115/1.185794010.1115/1.1857940 ↗
10. 10.1115/1.402946210.1115/1.4029462 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10807610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108076 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.01410.1016/j.compscitech.2018.09.014 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.01710.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.017 ↗
14. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.09.01410.1016/j.cplett.2008.09.014 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.02411610.1103/PhysRevB.73.024116 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.00710.1016/j.commatsci.2006.10.007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10809310.1016/j.matdes.2019.108093 ↗
20. 10.1007/s00339-018-1918-510.1007/s00339-018-1918-5 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.481991110.1063/1.4819911 ↗
22. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/11/11570410.1088/0957-4484/21/11/115704 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.43757710.1063/1.437577 ↗