journal article·2013-04

Modeling dislocation nucleation strengths in pristine metallic nanowires under experimental conditions

Andrew T. Jennings, Christopher R. Weinberger, Seok-Woo Lee, Zachary H. Aitken, Lucas Meza, Julia R. Greer

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

The nature of dislocation sources in small-scale metals is critical to understanding and building models of size-dependent crystalline strength at the nanoscale. Pre-existing dislocations with one pinning point can be readily described as truncated Frank–Read sources, and modeling their operation strengths is straightforward. In contrast, simple and accurate models describing surface dislocation nucleation processes remain elusive. Here, we develop a computationally simple model of heterogeneous dislocation nucleation from free surfaces by combining a continuum description of the nucleation process with the atomistic inputs where accuracy is critical. This model is used to derive the upper strength limits of single-crystalline face-centered cubic nanopillars as a function of size, material and crystal orientation for uniaxial compression and tension. The output parameter space of this model is critically compared against direct atomistic simulations, as well as experiments on tension of pristine gold nanowires and compression of copper nanopillars to highlight its virtues and limitations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Brenner · J Appl Phys · 1956 · 27 · 148410.1063/1.1722294 ↗
2. Brenner · J Appl Phys · 1957 · 28 · 102310.1063/1.1722900 ↗
3. Richter · Nano Lett · 2009 · 9 · 304810.1021/nl9015107 ↗
4. Bei · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 39710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.05.010 ↗
5. Sedlmayr · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 398510.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.018 ↗
6. Maaß · Small · 2012 · 8 · 186910.1002/smll.201102603 ↗
7. Diao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 64310.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.008 ↗
8. Gall · Nano Lett · 2004 · 4 · 243110.1021/nl048456s ↗
9. Cao · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 481610.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.044 ↗
10. Park · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 05410610.1103/PhysRevB.72.054106 ↗
11. Tiwary · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 10030110.1103/PhysRevB.84.100301 ↗
12. Jennings · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 562710.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.038 ↗
13. Weinberger · J Mech Phys Solids · 2012 · 60 · 8410.1016/j.jmps.2011.09.010 ↗
14. Zhu · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 4
15. Aubry · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 104310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.023 ↗
16. Weinberger CR. The Fundamentals of Plastic Deformation: Several Case Studies of Plasticity in Confined Volumes. Sandia National Laboratories Report 2012; SAND 2012-7736.10.2172/1055640 ↗
17. Rabkin · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 208510.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.058 ↗
18. Hirth · 1982
19. Liu · J Mech Phys Solids · 2009 · 57 · 107810.1016/j.jmps.2009.03.005 ↗
20. Li · Philos Mag · 2007 · 86 · 295710.1080/14786430500531751 ↗
21. Brochard · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 418210.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.009 ↗
22. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
23. Kang K. Atomistic modeling of fracture mechanisms in semiconductor nanowires under tension. Stanford University; 2010.
24. Medlin · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 368910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00284-1 ↗
25. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
26. Foiles · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 335110.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.037 ↗
27. Williams · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2006 · 14 · 81710.1088/0965-0393/14/5/002 ↗
28. Kang · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 216910.1080/14786430701222739 ↗
29. Scattergood · Philos Mag · 1975 · 31 · 17910.1080/14786437508229295 ↗
30. Ryu · J Mater Res · 2011 · 26 · 233510.1557/jmr.2011.275 ↗
31. Park · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 186210.1016/j.jmps.2006.03.006 ↗
32. Weinberger · J Mater Chem · 2011 · 22 · 327710.1039/c2jm13682a ↗
33. Tadmor · J Mech Phys Solids · 2004 · 52 · 250710.1016/j.jmps.2004.05.002 ↗
34. Tadmor · J Mech Phys Solids · 2003 · 51 · 75610.1016/S0022-5096(03)00005-X ↗
35. Ogata · Science · 2002 · 298 · 80710.1126/science.1076652 ↗
36. Tschopp · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2007 · 15 · 69310.1088/0965-0393/15/7/001 ↗
37. Diao · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 07541310.1103/PhysRevB.70.075413 ↗
38. Li · MRS Bull · 2007 · 32 · 15110.1557/mrs2007.48 ↗
39. Seo · Nano Lett · 2011 · 11 · 349910.1021/nl2022306 ↗
40. Beltz · Phys Status Solidi B – Basic Res · 1993 · 180 · 30310.1002/pssb.2221800203 ↗
41. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
42. Uchic · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2009 · 39 · 36110.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145422 ↗
43. Kraft · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 29310.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145409 ↗
44. Dehm · Prog Mater Sci · 2009 · 54 · 66410.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.005 ↗
45. Tyson · Surf Sci · 1977 · 62 · 26710.1016/0039-6028(77)90442-3 ↗
46. Boer · 1988
47. Jennings · J Mater Res · 2011 · 26 · 280310.1557/jmr.2011.338 ↗
48. Oh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 555810.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.015 ↗
49. Jennings · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 344410.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.013 ↗
50. Burek · Nano Lett · 2010 · 10 · 6910.1021/nl902872w ↗
51. Jennings · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 4