journal article·2008-05

Unambiguous classification of complex microstructures by their three-dimensional parameters applied to graphite in cast iron

A. Velichko, C. Holzapfel, A. Siefers, K. Schladitz, F. Mücklich

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Three-dimensional (3D) quantitative analysis is indispensable for the unambiguous characterization and objective classification of complex microstructures. Focused ion beam (FIB) nanotomography provides complete information of the spatial arrangement, chemistry and orientation of different phases of real microstructures on scales especially important in materials science (10 nm–100 μm). Complex graphite particles were analyzed in three-dimensions. Whereas nodular, vermicular and temper graphite particles can be characterized individually, the whole network of flake graphite has to be considered due to the high spatial interconnection of particles. The characterization method was verified in comparison to established two-dimensional stereological methods. The influence of anisotropy and image resolution was discussed. Basic stereological characteristics (volume, surface area, integrals of mean and total curvature) as well as 3D connectivity (Euler number) and shape parameters objectively differentiate these graphite morphologies and contribute to the understanding of their growth mechanisms and the properties of the cast iron.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Double · Acta Metal Mater · 1995 · 43 · 243510.1016/0956-7151(94)00416-1 ↗
2. Miao · J Mater Sci · 1994 · 29 · 25510.1007/BF00356601 ↗
3. Llorca-Isern · Micron · 2002 · 33 · 35710.1016/S0968-4328(01)00022-1 ↗
4. Growth structure of various forms of graphite
5. Tartera · Int J Cast Metal Res · 2003 · 16 · 13110.1080/13640461.2003.11819571 ↗
6. Ghaderi · Wear · 2003 · 255 · 41010.1016/S0043-1648(03)00156-X ↗
7. Holmgren · Int J Cast Metal Res · 2005 · 18 · 33110.1179/136404605225023153 ↗
8. Velichko · Adv Eng Mater · 2007 · 9 · 3910.1002/adem.200600175 ↗
9. Ohser · 2000
10. Stets · Giesserei · 2004 · 91 · 20
11. Roberts · Pract Metallogr · 2005 · 42 · 39610.3139/147.100272 ↗
12. Arns · Geophysics · 2002 · 67 · 139610.1190/1.1512785 ↗
13. Holzer · J Microsc · 2004 · 216 · 8410.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01397.x ↗
14. Konrad · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 136910.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.015 ↗
15. Lasagni · Adv Eng Mater · 2006 · 8 · 71910.1002/adem.200500276 ↗
16. VDE-Fachbericht
17. Velichko · Pract Metallogr · 2006 · 43 · 19210.3139/147.100297 ↗
18. Magenreute · Pract Metallogr · 2008 · 45 · 5310.3139/147.100371 ↗
19. Ohser · Image Anal Stereol · 2003 · 22 · 1110.5566/ias.v22.p11-19 ↗
20. Lee · CVGIP: Graph Model Image Process · 1991 · 53 · 522
21. Lang · J Microsc · 2001 · 202 · 110.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00906.x ↗
22. Nagel · J Microsc · 2000 · 198 · 5410.1046/j.1365-2818.2000.00668.x ↗
23. Russ · 2000
24. Schumann · 2005
25. Ohser · Pract Metallogr · 2003 · 40 · 45410.1515/pm-2003-400906 ↗
26. The Euler number of discretized sets – on the choice of adjacency in homogeneous lattices
27. Measurement of intrinsic volumes of sets observed on lattices