journal article·2013-06

Effect of the continuous stiffness measurement on the mechanical properties extracted using spherical nanoindentation

S.J. Vachhani, R.D. Doherty, S.R. Kalidindi

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The effects of the superimposed oscillating load while using the continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) technique on the extracted indentation stress–strain (ISS) curves were systematically investigated using spherical nanoindentation tests performed on a variety of samples, using probes of 1 and 100 μm radii. Particular care was afforded to the corrections that were needed on the load, displacement and stiffness signals to account for the effect of the superimposed oscillations. A decrease in the oscillation frequency from the commonly used 45 Hz caused the measured stiffness values to decrease. This resulted in questionable high strain hardening values in the ISS curves. The noise levels in the recorded stiffness signal were significantly higher while using an oscillation amplitude of 1 nm. It was concluded that these observations are artifacts of the machine dynamic control systems and do not represent the material’s true behavior. The CMS signal with a 45 Hz oscillation frequency and 2 nm amplitude appears to produce most reasonable values of stiffness values and is therefore the best choice for reliably extracting ISS curves for the materials studied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Li · Mater Charact · 2002 · 48 · 1110.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
2. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
3. Asif · Rev Sci Instrum · 1999 · 70 · 240810.1063/1.1149769 ↗
4. Asif · J Appl Phys · 2001 · 90 · 119210.1063/1.1380218 ↗
5. Oliver · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
6. Fischer-Cripps · 2002
7. Kalidindi · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 352310.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
8. Pathak · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 302010.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.008 ↗
9. Pharr · J Mater Res · 2009 · 24 · 65310.1557/jmr.2009.0096 ↗
10. Cordill · J Mater Res · 2008 · 23 · 160410.1557/JMR.2008.0205 ↗
11. Cordill · Int J Plast · 2009 · 25 · 204510.1016/j.ijplas.2008.12.015 ↗
12. Cordill · Int J Plast · 2009 · 25 · 28110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.02.003 ↗
13. Abusafieh · J Appl Polym Sci · 1997 · 63 · 7510.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19970103)63:1<75::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
14. VanLandingham · J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys · 2005 · 43 · 179410.1002/polb.20454 ↗
15. Mencik · J Mater Res · 2005 · 20 · 266010.1557/JMR.2005.0338 ↗
16. Pharr · J Mater Res · 2002 · 17 · 266010.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
17. Basu · J Mater Res · 2006 · 21 · 262810.1557/jmr.2006.0324 ↗
18. Herbert · Thin Solid Films · 2001 · 398–399 · 33110.1016/S0040-6090(01)01439-0 ↗
19. Pathak · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 196910.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.042 ↗
20. Hertz · 1896
21. Johnson · 1985
22. Gerberich · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 156910.1016/0956-7151(94)00351-H ↗
23. Bahr DF, Watkins CM, Kramer DE, Gerberich WW. Yield point phenomena during indentation. Fundamentals of nanoindentation and nanotribology. Symposium, 13–17 April 1998. Warrendale, PA: Mater Res Soc; 1998. p. 83.10.1557/PROC-522-83 ↗
24. Gouldstone · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 227710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00009-4 ↗
25. Pathak · J Mater Res · 2009 · 24 · 114210.1557/jmr.2009.0137 ↗
26. Schuh · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 215210.1557/JMR.2004.0276 ↗
27. 2004 · vol. 9