Electromechanical response of piezoelectric composites: Effects of geometric connectivity and grain size
Source abstract
Abstract
A three-dimensional finite element model has been developed to fully capture the complete electromechanical response of five types of piezoelectric composites (i.e. particulate, short-fiber, long-fiber, laminate and networked composites), the constituent phases of which can, in general, be elastically anisotropic and piezoelectrically active. It is demonstrated that the geometric connectivity of the constituent phases in a composite has a significant influence on the fundamental electromechanical properties and the performance characteristics of a piezoelectric composite. By constructing piezoelectric composite materials design maps, the long-fiber composites (with their highest piezoelectric coupling constants) and interpenetrating networked composites (with their highest piezoelectric charge coefficients) are, respectively, identified as being most suitable for ultrasonic imaging and hydrophone applications. Furthermore, grain size modifications of the constituent phases can significantly enhance the effective piezoelectric properties of a composite such as coupling constants and charge coefficients while maintaining suitable acoustic impedance, especially in the case of the networked composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Newnham · Mater Res Bull · 1978 · 13 · 52510.1016/0025-5408(78)90161-7 ↗
2. Kar-Gupta · J Appl Phys · 2008
3. Poizat · Computat Mater Sci · 1999 · 16 · 8910.1016/S0927-0256(99)00050-6 ↗
4. Pettermann · Int J Solids Struct · 2000 · 37 · 544710.1016/S0020-7683(99)00224-3 ↗
5. Kar-Gupta · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 98 · 054102-110.1063/1.2014933 ↗
6. Kar-Gupta · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 109310.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.023 ↗
7. Kar-Gupta · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 127510.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.042 ↗
8. Berger · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct · 2005 · 412 · 5310.1016/j.msea.2005.08.035 ↗
9. Berger · Smart Mater Struct · 2006 · 15 · 45110.1088/0964-1726/15/2/026 ↗
10. Zhang · Int J Eng Sci · 2005 · 43 · 113810.1016/j.ijengsci.2005.03.003 ↗
11. Lenglet · J Acoust Soc Am · 2003 · 113 · 82610.1121/1.1537710 ↗
12. Castillero · Int J Solids Struct · 1998 · 35 · 52710.1016/S0020-7683(97)00028-0 ↗
13. Tan · J Compos Mater · 2002 · 36 · 12710.1177/0021998302036002304 ↗
14. Tan · Compos Sci Technol · 2001 · 61 · 75910.1016/S0266-3538(01)00014-8 ↗
15. Levassort · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control · 1998 · 45 · 149710.1109/58.738289 ↗
16. Levassort · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control · 1997 · 44 · 44510.1109/58.585129 ↗
17. Levassort · IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control · 1999 · 46 · 102810.1109/58.775670 ↗
18. Dunn · Int J Solids Struct · 1993 · 30 · 16110.1016/0020-7683(93)90058-F ↗
19. Saito · Nature · 2004 · 432 · 8410.1038/nature03028 ↗
20. Takahashi · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2006 · 45 · 740510.1143/JJAP.45.7405 ↗
21. Takahashi · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2006 · 45 · L3010.1143/JJAP.45.L30 ↗
22. Karaki · Jpn J Appl Phys · 2007 · 46 · L9710.1143/JJAP.46.L97 ↗
23. Topolov · J Phys D · 2002 · 35 · 200810.1088/0022-3727/35/16/315 ↗
24. Ikeda · 1990
25. Nye · 1985
26. Guinovart-Diaz · Mater Lett · 2001 · 48 · 9310.1016/S0167-577X(00)00285-8 ↗
27. Kar-Gupta R. PhD Thesis, Tulane University, 2007.
28. Kar-Gupta · Acta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 406310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.037 ↗