journal article·2012-02

Application of the maximal entropy production principle to rapid solidification: A sharp interface model

Haifeng Wang, Feng Liu, Haimin Zhai, Kang Wang

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A maximal entropy production principle (MEPP) for chemical reactions was proposed to develop a sharp interface model for rapid solidification. In the modeling, the transport theorem was applied to distinguish the Gibbs energy dissipated by the interface and by the bulk phases from the total Gibbs energy. The bulk and the interface kinetics were described simultaneously and the effect of diffusion in the growing phase on the interface kinetics was incorporated. To obtain a general model, both the interface and the bulk phases were allowed to be under local non-equilibrium conditions. It was found that the model with solute drag is consistent with MEPP, in contrast with the model without solute drag. The model was applied to describe steady-state planar solidification of Si–9at.% As alloy, and a relatively good agreement between the model predictions and the experimental results was obtained. To show the solute drag effect, a partial solute drag model was proposed. Since an unreasonably large interface diffusion velocity results from negligible solute drag effect, the solute drag effect should be significant in solidification.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Onsager · Phys Rev · 1931 · 15 · 40510.1103/PhysRev.37.405 ↗
2. Ziegler · 1983
3. Martyushev · Phys Rep · 2006 · 426 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2005.12.001 ↗
4. Svoboda · Philos Mag · 1991 · 64 · 74910.1080/13642819108207635 ↗
5. Svoboda · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 369910.1080/14786430500267760 ↗
6. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 136910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00443-8 ↗
7. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 304310.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.041 ↗
8. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 95910.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.030 ↗
9. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 395310.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.027 ↗
10. Gamsjäger · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 259910.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.002 ↗
11. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 477510.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.020 ↗
12. Svoboda · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 385 · 166
13. Kozeschnik · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 385 · 157
14. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 4895
15. Fischer · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 107510.1080/0141861031000068966 ↗
16. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 446710.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.012 ↗
17. Svoboda · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 539510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.021 ↗
18. Christian · 2002
19. Herlach · Mater Sci Eng R · 1994 · 12 · 17710.1016/0927-796X(94)90011-6 ↗
20. Baker JC. PhD thesis, MIT, 1970. .
21. Aziz · J Appl Phys · 1982 · 53 · 115810.1063/1.329867 ↗
22. Aziz · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 233510.1016/0001-6160(88)90333-1 ↗
23. Kittl · Appl Phys Lett · 1994 · 64 · 136110.1063/1.111614 ↗
24. Kittl · J Cryst Growth · 1995 · 148 · 17210.1016/0022-0248(94)00836-1 ↗
25. Kittl · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 479710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00276-7 ↗
26. Ǻgren · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 18110.1016/0001-6160(89)90277-0 ↗
27. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1976 · 24 · 73110.1016/0001-6160(76)90108-5 ↗
28. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1977 · 25 · 1110.1016/0001-6160(77)90240-1 ↗
29. Hillert · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 448110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00336-5 ↗
30. Buchmann · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 16910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.039 ↗
31. Hillert · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 280310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00085-5 ↗
32. Hillert · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 54710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.10.027 ↗
33. Buchmann · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 10610.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.09.022 ↗
34. Jou · 2010
35. Sobolev · Phys Lett A · 1995 · 199 · 38310.1016/0375-9601(95)00084-G ↗
36. Sobolev · Phys Rev E · 1997 · 55 · 684510.1103/PhysRevE.55.6845 ↗
37. Galenko · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 14410310.1103/PhysRevB.65.144103 ↗
38. Galenko · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 375–377 · 49310.1016/j.msea.2003.10.013 ↗
39. Galenko · Phys Rev E · 2007 · 76 · 03160610.1103/PhysRevE.76.031606 ↗
40. Li · J Cryst Growth · 2010 · 312 · 98210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.12.070 ↗
41. Fischer · Acta Mech · 2004 · 171 · 21310.1007/s00707-004-0138-6 ↗
42. Hillert · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 9910.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.023 ↗
43. Galenko · Phys Lett A · 1997 · 235 · 27110.1016/S0375-9601(97)00562-8 ↗
44. Galenko · J Cryst Growth · 1999 · 197 · 99210.1016/S0022-0248(98)00977-4 ↗
45. Galenko · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 683410.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.038 ↗
46. Galenko · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 616610.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.043 ↗
47. Hartmann · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 103 · 07350910.1063/1.2903920 ↗
48. Olesinski · Bull Alloy Phase Diagrams · 1985 · 6 · 25410.1007/BF02880410 ↗
49. Kittl · J Appl Phys · 1993 · 73 · 372510.1063/1.352903 ↗
50. Eckler · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 97510.1016/0956-7151(94)90291-7 ↗